Dr. John W Cavanaugh, PhD ⭐🇺🇲 🇮🇪
@drjohncav.bsky.social
1.5K followers 1.8K following 560 posts
Cancer #survivor - Consultant. Author. Award winning Educator. Former NGO Program Officer and US Senate staffer. Passionate about civic engagement & global public affairs. linkedin.com/in/johnwcavanaugh/
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
drjohncav.bsky.social
In memory of my Beloved Therapy dog Jet (10/31/13 - 07/24/24) who is now flying free with the Blue Angels. No better wingman to Fight CRC.
Picture of my therapy dog Jet, a handsome black lab, sitting at the top of the National Veterans Memorial and Museum after a 5 mile walk.
Reposted by Dr. John W Cavanaugh, PhD ⭐🇺🇲 🇮🇪
katmabu.bsky.social
I can’t believe I have to say this, but historically, masked men who kidnap families in the middle of the night are usually not the good guys.
Reposted by Dr. John W Cavanaugh, PhD ⭐🇺🇲 🇮🇪
Reposted by Dr. John W Cavanaugh, PhD ⭐🇺🇲 🇮🇪
Reposted by Dr. John W Cavanaugh, PhD ⭐🇺🇲 🇮🇪
muellershewrote.com
Portland has elevated protesting to an art form.
Reposted by Dr. John W Cavanaugh, PhD ⭐🇺🇲 🇮🇪
thetnholler.bsky.social
🏆 How does a comedy show have the best news research team? @thedailyshow.com
Reposted by Dr. John W Cavanaugh, PhD ⭐🇺🇲 🇮🇪
Reposted by Dr. John W Cavanaugh, PhD ⭐🇺🇲 🇮🇪
kyledcheney.bsky.social
NEWS: James Comey pleaded not guilty to criminal charges that followed President Trump’s demand to prosecute.

The judge set a Jan. 5 trial date — but Comey is expected to try to kill the case before it starts, including by disqualifying Lindsey Halligan

www.politico.com/news/2025/10...
Reposted by Dr. John W Cavanaugh, PhD ⭐🇺🇲 🇮🇪
5-2blue.bsky.social
Federal prosecutors investigating former FBI Director James Comey for allegedly making false statements to Congress determined that a central witness in their probe would prove "problematic" and likely prevent them from establishing their case to a jury. abcnews.go.com/US/central-w...
Central witness undermines case against James Comey, prosecutors concluded: Sources
Ex-FBI Director James Comey faces federal charges, but prosecutors investigating him determined that a central witness in the case would prove "problematic," sources say.
abcnews.go.com
Reposted by Dr. John W Cavanaugh, PhD ⭐🇺🇲 🇮🇪
libertyovergov.bsky.social
🚨BREAKING: Former FBI Director James Comey pleads NOT GUILTY to charges of lying to Congress and obstructing a proceeding. Many believe Trump is targeting him out of revenge for investigating his 2016 campaign. Abuse of power to settle scores is dangerous and unconstitutional.
#BlueCrew #Resist
Graphic styled as a “BREAKING NEWS” alert featuring side-by-side photos of James Comey and Donald Trump. Bold text claims Comey pleaded not guilty to criminal charges and accuses Trump of abusing presidential power for revenge. A call to action urges viewers to “SMASH THE 👏🏽” if they agree Trump is acting unconstitutionally. Branding at bottom reads “CALL TO ACTIVISM.”
Reposted by Dr. John W Cavanaugh, PhD ⭐🇺🇲 🇮🇪
mjfree.bsky.social
James Comey is not a GNAT to be gotten rid of.

Trump’s turned the DOJ into a revenge machine — staging show trials through Pam Bondi and a beauty-pageant lawyer. This isn’t law & order. It’s a dictator auditioning for absolute power. ⬇️
Trump’s Political Persecution of Comey is Flagrant Criminal Abuse of Power
CALLING DEMS "GNATS" TO BE "GOTTEN RID OF" IS A DANGEROUS NATIONAL DISGRACE
open.substack.com
Reposted by Dr. John W Cavanaugh, PhD ⭐🇺🇲 🇮🇪
Reposted by Dr. John W Cavanaugh, PhD ⭐🇺🇲 🇮🇪
atrupar.com
Johnson: "He has defunded our education system. He has defunded our transportation system. He's firing black women across this country. He's defunding our healthcare system. This president is absolutely out of control... Chicago is going to stand firm in protecting humanity."
Reposted by Dr. John W Cavanaugh, PhD ⭐🇺🇲 🇮🇪
doggett.house.gov
As usual, Greg Abbott is an eager accomplice to Trump's wrongdoing. The illegal deployment of US troops against US citizens has never been about crime or immigration; Trump only wants to normalize the misuse of our military against his opponents.

Our Texas Guard should be serving Texans, not Trump.
Texas National Guard troops arrive in Illinois over leaders’ objections
The arrival of Texas National Guard troops came ahead of a Thursday hearing in Illinois’s lawsuit seeking to stop the Trump administration from deploying into the state.
www.washingtonpost.com
Reposted by Dr. John W Cavanaugh, PhD ⭐🇺🇲 🇮🇪
muellershewrote.com
NEW: Comey is going to file selective and vindictive prosecution motion to dismiss AND he will challenge the legality of Halligan’s appointment! There’s more, too… so glad @annabower.bsky.social is there to bring us the whole story! Thread below with details:
annabower.bsky.social
The judge also set an initial schedule for pre-trial motions.

The first set is expected by Oct. 12. Per Comey’s defense counsel, that batch will include motions to dismiss for selective and vindictive prosecution, as well as a motion challenging the legality of Halligan’s appointment as US attorney
Reposted by Dr. John W Cavanaugh, PhD ⭐🇺🇲 🇮🇪
congressmin.bsky.social
It's been two weeks since Adelita Grijalva was elected and Mike Johnson has still refused to seat her, unlike in past cases where he swore in new members within 24 hours.

There cannot be one set of rules for Rs and another for Ds.

Also, release the damn Epstein files already.
Reposted by Dr. John W Cavanaugh, PhD ⭐🇺🇲 🇮🇪
deanobeidallah.bsky.social
Why didn't Democratic Senators ask Pam Bondi why she didn't prosecute Jeffrey Epstein when she was Florida's Attorney General from 2011 to 2019 at the very time he was running his child sex ring in Florida?!!
Reposted by Dr. John W Cavanaugh, PhD ⭐🇺🇲 🇮🇪
furbabies.bsky.social
After yelling and obfuscating to senators for hours, Dick Durbin hit her with this one: "Eventually you are going to have to answer for your conduct in this. You won't do it today, but eventually you will." Suddenly, she went SILENT.🔥 She knows.

You're phucked, Pam....just sayin'
Reposted by Dr. John W Cavanaugh, PhD ⭐🇺🇲 🇮🇪
Reposted by Dr. John W Cavanaugh, PhD ⭐🇺🇲 🇮🇪
atrupar.com
Whitehouse: "The supposed contribution made to me by some Epstein person is actually not true. It's false. So, weird when an AG of the US comes to the Judiciary Committee & makes false allegations about a senator - demonstrably false - rather than answer a simple Q: Is there a picture, or no?"
Reposted by Dr. John W Cavanaugh, PhD ⭐🇺🇲 🇮🇪
thetnholler.bsky.social
BEHN: “Feed kids. Fix roads. And fund hospitals. Instead of handing out corporate tax breaks.”

TN-07 Democratic nominee @aftynbehn.bsky.social puts her people-first priorities front and center in a high-energy victory speech
Reposted by Dr. John W Cavanaugh, PhD ⭐🇺🇲 🇮🇪
anthonyclark.bsky.social
I wonder how, if at all, Nelson v City of Davis (2012)—about the use of pepperballs against people who posed no threat to officers—will affect this case, in terms of qualified immunity, unreasonable force, and the Fourth Amendment.
Excerpts from an article by a California public-entity law firm https://jones-mayer.com/vol-27-no-15-qualified-immunity-denied-when-force-is-used-against-non-threatening-persons/

On July 11, 2012, the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals upheld the denial of qualified immunity for police officers who fired pepperballs into a crowd of partygoers who posed no threat to them. In the case of Nelson v. City of Davis, 2012 DAR 9528, the court ruled that the use of force was unreasonable and violated "clearly established" constitutional rights. The court concluded that qualified immunity from civil liability was not appropriate in this case since, as a result of many court decisions, "any reasonable officer ... would have been on notice prior to April 2004 that the application of pepper spray to individuals such as Nelson and his associates, whose only transgression was the failure to disperse as quickly as the officers desired, would violate the Fourth Amendment." "Thus, just as our prior cases provided notice to all reasonable officers that targeting Nelson and his group with a projectile weapon with concussive force that could cause serious physical injury or targeting them with pepper spray was unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment, our precedents make it equally clear that utilizing a weapon against Nelson's group that combined both of these forms of force amounted to a constitutional violation." The court concluded that "a reasonable officer would have known that firing projectiles, including pepperballs, in the direction of individuals suspected of, at most, minor crimes, who posed no threat to the officers or others, and who engaged in only passive resistance, was unreasonable."
Reposted by Dr. John W Cavanaugh, PhD ⭐🇺🇲 🇮🇪