Fiber farmer, dendrophile.
That’s the Trump admin’s stance on everything. When the law doesn’t allow it, lie about the facts until it’s something that would be legal, then insist others live inside the lie.
"literally all nonviolent protest” could be considered evidence of rebellion. Is that your argument?
Hamilton: The president has determined there is a danger of a rebellion, and you must defer to that finding
Tonight, at Law Dork:
Tonight, at Law Dork:
-nonthreatening target in an area the US military operates freely
-no legal authority, nor attempt to cite statute
-no evidence presented
-no individuals identified
-no articulated strategic goal, nor explanation how to achieve it
Watch out Republicans - we are winning all over the country up and down the ballot.
I've been a court reporter for many years, and I've never covered anything like this: A student deeply committed to her studies, imprisoned solely over writing an op-ed, being made to testify under oath for her own freedom.
Dark, dark stuff.
I've been a court reporter for many years, and I've never covered anything like this: A student deeply committed to her studies, imprisoned solely over writing an op-ed, being made to testify under oath for her own freedom.
Dark, dark stuff.
And then... I lost it.
And then... I lost it.