MY: Well they’ll probably win enough Senate races next November to hold the Senate at least another three years, letting them secure majorities on SCOTUS and other federal courts to reduce their need to win free and fair elections.
Replies:
MY: Well they’ll probably win enough Senate races next November to hold the Senate at least another three years, letting them secure majorities on SCOTUS and other federal courts to reduce their need to win free and fair elections.
Replies:
Liberalism used to be obsessed with tradeoffs (the basis of all Slate pitches!) and would mock tradeoff denialism on the right. Not any more.
Until his party sees a real electoral backlash, they likely see little incentive to resist.
Until his party sees a real electoral backlash, they likely see little incentive to resist.
"[Other attacks on LGBTQ rights] merit far more attention and scorn than a long-shot bid to take down marriage equality."
Hard agree. And I say that as a gay married person with personal stake at the issue.
🧵 Brief thread
now, may they have reasons for that - they want to negotiate some stuff for an endorsement (part of the usual give & take of these things) or just want to delay it for maximum impact