James McGuire
@gozermac.bsky.social
110 followers 180 following 680 posts
Retired Marine Colonel - Vote every Republican politician out of office. Every single one.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
gozermac.bsky.social
Get engaged. Contact your representative and tell them you want the President impeached for

Bribery - uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?p...

Emoluments - constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay...

High Crimes and misdemeanors - Impoundment uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?r...

www.house.gov
Homepage | house.gov
www.house.gov
Reposted by James McGuire
martindev4.bsky.social
THIS THIS THIS
propublica.org
Now that Tom Homan is border czar, his former business associate Charles Sowell is continuing to work with companies actively seeking to land a chunk of the $45 billion Congress approved to spend on immigration detention.

➡️ Read the full story: https://propub.li/3IusbGP
Article excerpt: After Trump won and formally announced Homan would be returning with him to the White House, Sowell kept Homan on his payroll until the end of the year. Once named as the border czar, Homan said he would recuse himself from contracting, saying he would have no “involvement, discussion, input, or decision of any future government contracts.”

But several industry executives who spoke with ProPublica said at least half a dozen companies vying for a slice of the $45 billion Congress has allocated for immigration detention work had hired Sowell because he had led them to believe his connections to Homan would help their chances of winning government work.

Homan's business relationships are under greater scrutiny after MSNBC reported an FBI sting that allegedly caught him on tape accepting $50,000 in cash from undercover agents posing as would-be government contractors before he took the border czar post.

His relationship with Sowell raises fresh questions about the integrity of the billion-dollar contracting process for immigration enforcement, ethics experts say.
Reposted by James McGuire
brucemirken.mas.to.ap.brid.gy
"Once citizens begin to view their own government’s security forces as an occupying army, violence becomes inevitable. Trump’s team knows this. In fact, that’s the point. They are not trying to restore order; they’re trying to trigger the very unrest that would justify further crackdowns." […]
Original post on mas.to
mas.to
Reposted by James McGuire
Reposted by James McGuire
muellershewrote.com
Pam Bondi admits she spoke to Apple to "get the ICEBlock app taken down." Sounds an awful lot like coercion to suppress disfavored speech to me. A clear violation of the 1st Amendment.
atrupar.com
Bondi claims that the ICEBlock app was "criminal in that people were posting where ICE officers lived"
gozermac.bsky.social
Do you have a data file of the charges? Looking for the specific federal codes charged.
Reposted by James McGuire
gozermac.bsky.social
His cabinet secretaries and aides recognize this and have stepped in to fill the vacuum. Fortunately they are mostly incompetent.
gozermac.bsky.social
The people deserve a better adjudication than leaving the interpretation of circumstances and the definition of insurrection and rebellion to the judgement of this President and his advisors. Especially given the evidence of doctored images and disseminated propaganda on social media sites.
Reposted by James McGuire
jenmercieca.bsky.social
The way to win elections on the left is to tell people a narrative that they want to engage with, that gives them a heroic role to play, that creates a community, and gives everyone in that community a special status. Voting is an act of ratification for the community they want to see triumph. 🏆
Reposted by James McGuire
radleybalko.bsky.social
Absolute failure of our system that a federal judge can be “very concerned” about Trump’s unlawful attempt to send troops into a city, but also powerless to stop it.

The default should be to protect us from government abuse, not to protect government from temporary inconvenience.
National Guard deployment moves ahead in Illinois after judge declines state's suit to block Trump call-up — Chicago Tribune
Attorneys for the Trump administration said in court that Texas National Guard units could begin operations by Tuesday, the same day Illinois Guard members have been ordered to report.
apple.news
Reposted by James McGuire
asharangappa.bsky.social
Under the 1991 Intelligence Authorization Act to authorize covert action POTUS needs to sign a written finding that the covert action is necessary “to support an identifiable foreign policy objective” otherwise appropriated funds cannot be used
Reposted by James McGuire
gbrockell.bsky.social
Claim: 10 cars rammed ICE
Truth: No cars rammed ICE

Claim: She boxed ICE in
Truth: ICE boxed her in

Claim: She shot a rifle at ICE
Truth: She did not have a rifle

Claim: ICE returned fire
Truth: Only ICE fired

Claim: She drove herself to the hospital
Truth: Paramedics found her
Reposted by James McGuire
kenwhite.bsky.social
It’s important to flood social media and news channels with news about how ICE lies, so that potential jurors see it.
Reposted by James McGuire
jonseidel.bsky.social
Switching now to a TRO hearing in the lawsuit below, alleging suppression of 1st Amendment rights at Broadview's ICE facility.

DISCLOSURE: I am a member of the Chicago Newspaper Guild, a plaintiff. I'm not an officer and was not involved in the filing: www.loevy.com/wp-content/u...
www.loevy.com
Reposted by James McGuire
annabower.bsky.social
NEW: Comey arraignment moved up to Wednesday at 10 am.
This matter comes before the Court on its own initiative.
The arraignment of Defendant James B. Comey, Jr. is currently scheduled to occur on
Thursday, October 9, 2025, at 10:00 a.m.
Because there are multiple previously-scheduled matters that are expected to draw large
numbers of people to the courthouse at the same time as the arraignment, and because it is
necessary to ensure the security of the Court, the parties, and the public, it is hereby
ORDERED that Defendant is summoned to appear for arraignment before this Court on
Wednesday, October 8, 2025, at 10:00 a.m.
The Clerk is directed to forward a copy of this Order to counsel of record.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Is/
Michael S. Nachmanoff
—W一
United States District Judge
Michael S. Nachmanoff
United States District Judge
Reposted by James McGuire
Reposted by James McGuire
annabower.bsky.social
UPDATE: The state agency tasked with appointing a new prosecutor to take over Fani Willis' case against Trump and others in GA has asked the judge for an extension.

Citing the complexity of the case, the Prosecuting Attorneys' Council wants at least 90 days to find a replacement prosecutor.
Due to the complexity of this case and the vast personnel and resources required to handle a case
of this nature, it will require time to seek a District Attorney Pro Tempore willing to take on this
prosecution. Moreover, based on the holding in State v. Roman, 373 Ga. App. 863 (2024),
additional inquiries must be made that could potentially disqualify likely candidates from the list
of attorneys found in O.C.G.A. § 15-18-5 (a)(1)-(3).
Until disqualification, only members of the District Attorney's Office for the Atlanta Judicial
Circuit had access to the case file. The undersigned has requested the physical file to be provided
to him to facilitate a seamless period of transition from the disqualified office to the new
prosecutor's office. Based on information provided by the Atlanta Judicial Circuit, due to the
voluminous size of the case file, the Prosecuting Attorneys' Council does not expect to receive the
full case file in the instant case for approximately four weeks from the date of this filing. Without
having the file, the undersigned cannot intelligently answer questions of anyone requested to take
the appointment or to do his own diligence in finding a prosecutor who is not encumbered by a
significant appearance of impropriety.
Based on the foregoing, the State respectfully requests the Court reconsider its order or provide
the undersigned no less than 90 days from receipt of the case file to appoint a conflict prosecutor
gozermac.bsky.social
For instance…say they are housed in a barracks at the Great Lakes Naval Station but have to perform duty at Broadview. Does the ISP allow them to transit? Shop at the exchange which requires leaving Federal property to access?
Reposted by James McGuire
unraveledpress.com
Well, yeah, we're suing ICE.

This wasn't really a hard decision. As little faith as we have in institutions, we recognize the value of drawing visible lines in the sand. We drew ours personally a while ago, but better late than never.

May every protester be freed and may this occupation end.
gozermac.bsky.social
I can see RadioFreeTom’s eye twitching from space.
gozermac.bsky.social
Much better than milk poast.
Reposted by James McGuire
justinglawe.bsky.social
Part of Leavitt’s justification for the Guard in Portland: people are “disrespecting” ICE and engaged in “civil disobedience.”

Section 12406 allows deployment only in the event of foreign invasion, a rebellion, or inability to enforce federal laws.

Not disrespect and disobedience.
atrupar.com
COLLINS: Which local officials in Portland have said that the National Guard is needed there?

LEAVITT: The judge's opinion is untethered in reality and the law