Isn’t that why the rest of you are here, too?
Can we see this as more backpedaling or is that wishful thinking?
"Any peace plan between Ukraine and Russia must:
▪️End the killing while preserving Ukraine's sovereignty.
▪️Be acceptable to both Russia and Ukraine.
▪️Maximize the chances that the war does not start again."
Can we see this as more backpedaling or is that wishful thinking?
All makes sense. I’d add this: Zelensky’s decision to treat this farcical turn of events with grave seriousness may have less to do with diplomatic prudence than with seeing an opportunity to dampen the fuss about corruption & the clamouring for him to sack Yermak
All makes sense. I’d add this: Zelensky’s decision to treat this farcical turn of events with grave seriousness may have less to do with diplomatic prudence than with seeing an opportunity to dampen the fuss about corruption & the clamouring for him to sack Yermak
One standout is the line “It is expected that Russia will not invade neighboring countries,” a clunky English phrasing mirroring the Russian “ожидается.”
Correspondance de @gullivercragg.bsky.social, sur place, dans #ÀLaUneF24 ⤵️
Correspondance de @gullivercragg.bsky.social, sur place, dans #ÀLaUneF24 ⤵️
#TheBBC #BBCNews #BritishBroadcastingCorporation #originstory
#TheBBC #BBCNews #BritishBroadcastingCorporation #originstory
The deal is likely to be signed during Putin's trip to India next month.
I would delete the used condom comparison and add that the survival of media like the BBC is crucial to our defence against Russia and if Keir Starmer understands that threat he should be appalled by what’s happened.
Apart from that I fully second this piece
I would delete the used condom comparison and add that the survival of media like the BBC is crucial to our defence against Russia and if Keir Starmer understands that threat he should be appalled by what’s happened.
Apart from that I fully second this piece
nyti.ms/3WtMo2Q
Brilliant how he cuts short the presenter’s attempt to defuse the row by saying there are lots of different interpretations of Maidan - “not really, and you were there too, reporting - you think you were fooled cos it was actually a CIA plot?”
I believe this is exactly how public accountability should work - when a liar is called a liar.
Brilliant how he cuts short the presenter’s attempt to defuse the row by saying there are lots of different interpretations of Maidan - “not really, and you were there too, reporting - you think you were fooled cos it was actually a CIA plot?”
Literally demolishing the White House though?
Literally demolishing the White House though?
www.bloomberg.com/news/feature...