Jordan Theriault
@jtheriault.bsky.social
2.4K followers 2K following 89 posts
Assistant Prof @Northeastern. Psychology + Biology. Neuroimaging, brain metabolism + mental health. Director of IASLab with ‪Lisa Feldman Barrett & Karen Quigley https://www.affective-science.org/ http://www.jordan-theriault.com/
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
jtheriault.bsky.social
Really interesting! It seems the form is at capacity. Any chance of new slots opening up?
Reposted by Jordan Theriault
adrian-currie.bsky.social
If you’re interested in practicing the philosophy of science in practice why not come along to an online workshop “the philosophy of science in practice - in practice”? #philsci
Reposted by Jordan Theriault
pessoabrain.bsky.social
𝗔𝗻 𝗘𝘃𝗼𝗹𝘂𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝗮𝗿𝘆 𝗦𝘁𝗼𝗿𝘆 𝗼𝗳 𝗔𝗴𝗲𝗻𝗰𝘆
This short book by Moreno and Pereto' looks very interesting. One more on the understanding of biological agency.
And it's open access!
link.springer.com/book/10.1007...
Reposted by Jordan Theriault
Reposted by Jordan Theriault
bootsmcgoot.bsky.social
"i just use it to generate ideas"
jtheriault.bsky.social
Grim Fandango for sure. Also Hypnospace Outlaw!
Also, embarrassing to admit, but Nier Automata was genuinely excellent, and gets bonus points for working within the genre of escapist slop, but then ultimately putting that frame into question and rising above it. Was brought to tears by the ending.
Reposted by Jordan Theriault
thomasserre.bsky.social
Brown’s Department of Cognitive & Psychological Sciences is hiring a tenure-track Assistant Professor, working in the area of AI and the Mind (start July 1, 2026). Apply by Nov 8, 2025 👉 apply.interfolio.com/173939

#AI #CognitiveScience #AcademicJobs #BrownUniversity
Apply - Interfolio {{$ctrl.$state.data.pageTitle}} - Apply - Interfolio
apply.interfolio.com
jtheriault.bsky.social
Very cool!
toninfrc.bsky.social
📢Our peer-reviewed article about the AffectTracker is finally out! 😲🕹️📈
Traditional methods for rating emotion often miss the dynamic, moment-to-moment nature of feelings. We designed a tool to capture this continuous affective experience in real-time during dynamic emotional stimulation.
Frontiers | AffectTracker: real-time continuous rating of affective experience in immersive virtual reality
Subjective experience is key to understanding affective states, characterized by valence and arousal. Traditional experiments using post-stimulus summary rat...
doi.org
Reposted by Jordan Theriault
tiffanyito.bsky.social
University of Colorado Boulder Psychology & Neuroscience is searching for TWO tenure track assistant professors!!

jobs.colorado.edu/jobs/JobDeta...

#socialpsychology #cogpsyc #PsychSciSky #PsychJob
#psycjobs #psychology

1/n
Assistant Professor
jobs.colorado.edu
Reposted by Jordan Theriault
neuroyogacara.bsky.social
I'm bumping this job announcement up again, for folks who might have missed it last time!
jtheriault.bsky.social
@nancykanwisher.bsky.social, @bwz-brain.bsky.social, genuinely curious for your take here, as it would help clarify a lot.

When you say "FFA does face processing", do you mean that face processing implies FFA activity? Or do you mean that FFA activity implies face processing?
jtheriault.bsky.social
The reverse claim, FFA->FP means
~FP
∴ ~FFA.
i.e., if the task doesn't involve face processing, you should not see FFA activity.

The question was which claim is meant when saying "The FFA does face processing".

FP->FFA seems totally reasonable, but means FFA is not be unique to face processing.
jtheriault.bsky.social
Just to press on this a bit more, because I'm bummed this never got a response: It's useful because it shows what negative evidence implies for different claims.

FP->heart
no (~) heart
therefore (∴) ~FP. (obviously)

For FFA, it would mean:
FP->FFA
~FFA
∴ ~FP, which I think most would accept.

1/2
bwz-brain.bsky.social
I’m not sure how useful this form is for characterizing part of the brain that does specific computation though. The heart is an important part of keep me alive to do face processing, but it does’t seem useful to say face processing -> heart is active. though it’s logically correct.
Reposted by Jordan Theriault
ufeest.bsky.social
Great to see that people are reading Danziger!
I increasingly started to get interested in questions about cultural specificty of psychological kinds toward the end of my book as well.
press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/bo...
Reposted by Jordan Theriault
nicolecrust.bsky.social
Wherever a researcher comes down on natural kinds, constructs & Operationalization, I agree it would be great for more to realize it’s a thing to think through it all wrt “What are we doing here?” This book (especially the Intro start) is good to get the gist.

api.pageplace.de/preview/DT04...
Screenshot of linked book chapter
Reposted by Jordan Theriault
christakou.bsky.social
A Journal Club by Rodrigues and Sobrinho on our recent paper "Evidence for control of cerebral neurovascular function by circulating platelets in healthy older adults" in @jphysiol.bsky.social
physoc.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10....
Schematic summary of key findings and proposed mechanisms from Rossetti et al. (2025) regarding the interaction between circulating platelets and cerebral neurovascular function in healthy ageing.
Reposted by Jordan Theriault
tedmccormick.bsky.social
It was amazing to me that the report I heard on this *only* mentioned effects on tech. Especially given the war(s) on universities, and on immigrants, being so visible on other fronts.
Reposted by Jordan Theriault
Reposted by Jordan Theriault
nicolecrust.bsky.social
This paper presents an interesting account of the 1700s parsing of the mind by Kant and others into knowing(=cognition)/feeling(=affection)/willing(=contation).

It also laments that "knowing" somehow took over everything else, which I'm sympathetic to 😉.

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11608381/
For two hundred years many psychologists took for granted that the study of mind could be divided into three parts: cognition, affection, and conation. They disagreed on whether these should be considered faculties of the mind or merely a classification of aspects of mental activity, but the threefold division was repeatedly revived. In the last twenty-five years, if we judge from the titles of books and journal articles, scientific psychology-whether its focus is on perception, learning and memory, development, or personality and social psychology-has become engaged withone of these aspects, now called cognitive psychology. An examination of the tripartite classification in historical perspective may show the extent to which affection and conation are now suffering neglect by contrast with cognition as their coequal. This historical review may give a better understanding of what is happening in the present.
jtheriault.bsky.social
Cool! Was "will" the closest English translation for the German concept at the time?
Also, to clarify, not saying no one in English ever thought about "why people do what they do" before 1900! The point was that psychologists coined a term to flag a new explanatory target for scientific pursuit.
jtheriault.bsky.social
Danziger's definitely worth a read. Constructing the Subject is also useful for seeing how stats and group-based experiments became the gold standard in psych. This worked well for interventions and population studies, but not so good for understanding individual experience (e.g., emotion).
jtheriault.bsky.social
Super interesting! Reminds me of a point from Danziger's "Naming the Mind": That "motivation", as a term, was coined in the 20th century, largely to cover the ambition of early psychologists to explain ALL human behavior, which was thought impossible earlier.
www.amazon.com/Naming-Mind-...
Google n gram showing usage of the word "motivation". Usage increased after 1900, flattened from 1938-1945, then rose again to hold steady since ~1975.
Reposted by Jordan Theriault