Katy Glenn Bass
@katygb.bsky.social
2.5K followers 630 following 130 posts
Research Director, Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
katygb.bsky.social
"The greatest weapon that the forces of regime change possess is the fear of inevitability. If everyone believes that Mr. Trump will succeed in reshaping America, he will." @himself.bsky.social on how civil society can win by sticking together (gift link)
www.nytimes.com/2025/10/08/o...
Opinion | You Beat Trumpism by Banding Together. It’s as Hard and as Simple as That.
www.nytimes.com
katygb.bsky.social
From the complaint: “No legitimate purpose exists for this brutality or for these arrests. The officers are not physically threatened. No government property is threatened. Defendants are acting to intimidate and silence the press and civilians engaged in protected First Amendment activities.”
unraveledpress.com
Please note: protesters, clergy and a neighbor are also on this suit/also making claims here (it's a lot of reporters, but not only reporters!)
kyledcheney.bsky.social
JUST IN: Chicago journalistsa re suing DHS and ICE over force used against reporters:

storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
katygb.bsky.social
I am always proud to work with such brilliant, principled colleagues at @knightcolumbia.org. Today more than ever. Our litigators gave this case everything they had, and they won.
jameeljaffer.bsky.social
Judge Young: "The First Amendment does not draw President Trump’s invidious distinction and it is not to be found in our history or jurisprudence." An extraordinary, historic victory for democratic freedom. knightcolumbia.org/content/in-l...
In Landmark Ruling, Federal Court Says Trump Administration Violated First Amendment By Deporting Foreign Citizens for Pro-Palestinian Advocacy
knightcolumbia.org
katygb.bsky.social
The project will include a scholarly essay series looking at historical and current examples of how lawyers can either serve as crucial players in resistance to authoritarianism, or can be co-opted into it, and several major public events. Call for proposals and other info coming soon!
katygb.bsky.social
Well, it’s a fitting day to announce a new @knightcolumbia.org project: We’ll be working with Prof. Madhav Khosla, a comparative constitutional law scholar, for the next two years on the role of the legal profession in an era of rising authoritarianism: knightcolumbia.org/content/madh...
Madhav Khosla to Join Knight Institute as Senior Fellow
knightcolumbia.org
Reposted by Katy Glenn Bass
opinionhaver.bsky.social
that's why you bring the US flag to protests, folks
bebopott.bsky.social
HARDEST PHOTO OF 2025 JUST DROPPED
Curtis Evans, of Evanston, a military veteran USMC intelligence during President Reagan’s era, carries a U.S. Flag through gas deployed by federal officers as they clear protesters from the entrance of the Immigration and Customs Enforcement facility in Broadview on Sept. 19, 2025. (Stacey Wescott/Chicago Tribune)
Reposted by Katy Glenn Bass
genevievelakier.bsky.social
In this post I explain why the suspension of Kimmel’s show looks like a blatant 1A violation, as all NINE members of SCOTUS last year made clear.... but also why courts may not be able to do much about it (and yet Kimmel should still sue!) blog.dividedargument.com/p/did-brenda...
Did Brendan Carr Violate the First Amendment? And Can Anything Be Done?
the constitutional law of jawboning
blog.dividedargument.com
katygb.bsky.social
The Court just ruled a year ago (in NRA v Vullo) that "government officials cannot attempt to coerce private parties in order to punish or suppress views that the government disfavors."
politico.com
Opinion: Jimmy Kimmel has Supreme Court precedent on his side. He should sue the Trump administration, writes law professor Aziz Huq.

Read the full opinion piece: ow.ly/Curx50WYXq4
katygb.bsky.social
Read @daphnek.bsky.social on jawboning below - and more posts in the @knightcolumbia.org jawboning series she wrote for are available here: knightcolumbia.org/research/jaw...
katygb.bsky.social
Denying passports to citizens, stripping visas, denying visitors' entry on ideological grounds - we've seen this before, in the McCarthy era. Here's Sam Lebovic, an excellent historian of this period, on efforts to restrict Americans' access to ideas from abroad:
knightcolumbia.org/content/do-a...
Do Americans Have a Right to Know About the World?
Lessons from a forgotten front in the history of the right to access information
knightcolumbia.org
Reposted by Katy Glenn Bass
katygb.bsky.social
New @knightcolumbia.org essay on how the IHRA definition of antisemitism now being adopted by many universities harms academic freedom and chills speech, by Kenneth S. Stern of @bardcollege.bsky.social, the original drafter of that definition. knightcolumbia.org/content/a-ba...
A Bad Deal: By Adopting the IHRA Definition of Antisemitism, Universities are Sacrificing Academic Freedom
knightcolumbia.org
katygb.bsky.social
I'm deeply grateful to Ken for writing this for us, and I hope decision makers at universities will read it.
katygb.bsky.social
He closes with some reflections from his long career as a scholar of hate:
The old saw is that antisemitism is the miner’s canary for the health of a society, and that’s true. But so is the inverse: the vilification of anyone in society can increase antisemitism. When I speak at synagogues and people ask me what my greatest worry about antisemitism is today, I point to two things. The first is the targeting of anyone among us for exclusion or attack—whether it be Muslims, immigrants, transgender people, or anyone else. That singling out, that dehumanization, is a gateway which taps into our human capacity to find comfort from classifying others as a “them” (there’s a chapter about the brain science behind this in the Bard Center for the Study of Hate’s soon-to-be released book Simply Human: A Guide to Understanding and Combating Hate, published by the University of Toronto Press).
katygb.bsky.social
He goes on to document the ways the definition has been used against free speech, both on campuses and, increasingly, even more broadly. He also notes that adopting this definition directly conflicts with increasingly popular “institutional neutrality” policies at universities:
The adoption of the IHRA definition also directly conflicts with the trend in many universities to adopt some version of “institutional neutrality,” largely modeled on the University of Chicago’s Kalven Report. In the aftermath of October 7, and the criticism of university presidents for whatever they said or didn’t say (too tepid calling out Hamas’ atrocities, insufficient recognition of Palestinian suffering), many universities have moved to establish institutional neutrality policies, committing not to take a stand on issues of current concern except when they directly impact the academic freedom interests of a campus. However, a university cannot adopt the IHRA definition without endorsing a specific position in a political debate. Adopting the IHRA definition not only violates the Kalven principles, it does so to the detriment of academic freedom.
katygb.bsky.social
Stern, the director of Bard's Center for the Study of Hate, explains the origins of the definition and its initial purpose – to serve as a guide for organizations that were trying to track the prevalence of antisemitic incidents over time. As he states:
The IHRA working definition of antisemitism that is being adopted as a de facto hate speech code at universities around the country was never intended to be used to determine whether speech should be disciplined. It was never intended to be used by campus administrators at all.
katygb.bsky.social
New @knightcolumbia.org essay on how the IHRA definition of antisemitism now being adopted by many universities harms academic freedom and chills speech, by Kenneth S. Stern of @bardcollege.bsky.social, the original drafter of that definition. knightcolumbia.org/content/a-ba...
A Bad Deal: By Adopting the IHRA Definition of Antisemitism, Universities are Sacrificing Academic Freedom
knightcolumbia.org
katygb.bsky.social
And a bit on democratic values and corporate capture:
Democratic values are also jeopardized by the degree to which private companies will exercise governing power over users in the LMA economy. LMAs are likely to become the principal means by which we interact with digital technologies [79, 82]. This could be profoundly empowering. But on our present trajectory we are likely to interact primarily with platform agents owned by the major digital platforms, which monitor and govern our behavior in much the same way existing algorithmic intermediaries do—except instead of only governing us when we interact with their platform, they will become universal intermediaries, that mediate all of our digital activities [80]. This is likely to mean that they have even more pervasive control over what will be an even greater proportion of our lives. This will further increase our collective heteronomy. Of course, this risk could be substantially diminished if an effective marketplace of LMAs exists, in which users can easily switch between different agents and at least some agents exercise power reasonably [80]. The precedent of the consolidation of digital platforms, however, suggests that this kind of genuinely competitive agent marketplace is unlikely to persist for long without robust, intentional support
katygb.bsky.social
On this paper as an exercise in anticipatory ethics:
This paper is an exercise in “anticipatory ethics”[62]: the project of identifying ex ante the likely ethical questions raised by new technologies, and using that knowledge to shape those technologies for the better [75]. 15. For a complementary discussion of “sociotechnical speculative ethics,” see [44]. For a general articulation and defense of anticipatory AI ethics, see [74].This paper does not aim to forecast the net impact of LMAs on society, taking into account all of the possible positive and negative effects, weighting them for their probability, and summing them all together. Instead, it aims to identify the features of capable AI agents that, given the environment into which such systems will be deployed, are likely to be either societally beneficial or else harmful. The goal is not to make an all-things-considered prediction, but to highlight discrete hazards and opportunities that can be mitigated or exploited when designing and deploying these systems.
katygb.bsky.social
Here’s their roadmap for the paper:
In this paper, we explore how AI agents might benefit, advance, and complicate the realization of democratic values. We aim to consider both faces of the computational Janus, avoiding both Panglossian optimism and ahistorical catastrophizing.

We begin (Section II) by defining key terms and introducing our approach. We then explore AI agents’ democratic implications through three lenses. Section III examines how agents may interact with structural pressures already straining democratic institutions. Section IV identifies novel threats they could introduce. Section V outlines how to design ‘agents for democracy’ that reinforce, rather than undermine, those institutions.

Democracies are weaker than they have been for decades. A great wave is coming, and they are ill-prepared. AI agents may be cure as well as cause, but we cannot depend on them, nor can we simply trust that they will advance democratic values by default. Our urgent task is to rebuild and revitalize the institutions and practices that advance democratic values, restoring their resilience against the technological and social upheaval ahead
katygb.bsky.social
New paper by @sethlazar.org and Tino Cuéllar of @carnegieendowment.org for @knightcolumbia.org's project on AI & Democratic Freedoms - AI Agents and Democratic Resilience. Short 🧵 below with a few screenshots from the essay to pique your interest: knightcolumbia.org/content/ai-a...
AI Agents and Democratic Resilience
knightcolumbia.org
Reposted by Katy Glenn Bass
normative.bsky.social
The Trumpist majority on SCOTUS, like Trump himself, is spending down a trust fund they did not create, apparently believing it refills automatically. But it doesn’t. The whole system depends on other key institutions treating their rulings as legitimate.
esqueer.net
It seems like federal district courts are in full revolt against SCOTUS. I've never seen such direct scathing criticism of SCOTUS like this from the bench over their shadow docket rulings quietly overturning precedent without explanation.

From the Harvard decision today.
A screenshot of page 28 of a legal document discussing the difficulty lower courts face when interpreting unclear or rapidly evolving guidance from the Supreme Court.

The following phrases and sentences are highlighted in yellow:

* "That said, the Supreme Court’s recent emergency docket rulings regarding grant terminations have not been models of clarity, and have left many issues unresolved."
* "California was a four-paragraph per curiam decision issued in the context of a stay application."
* "The outcome, which no party had requested, was, thus, inconsistent with the views of eight justices"
* "the issues are complex and evolving."
* "this Court, not the district courts or courts of appeals, will often still be the ultimate decisionmaker as to the interim legal status of major new federal statutes and executive actions."
* "...it is unhelpful and unnecessary to criticize district courts for “defy[ing]” the Supreme Court when they are working to find the right answer in a rapidly evolving doctrinal landscape, where they must grapple with both existing precedent and interim guidance from the Supreme Court that appears to set that precedent aside without much explanation or consensus."
katygb.bsky.social
Great op-ed on how Trump's EOs targeting DEI and trans people will limit scientific inquiry and the development of knowledge - ties in nicely with @kendraserra.bsky.social's essay for @knightcolumbia.org's series on federal funding & the 1st Amendment: knightcolumbia.org/blog/facts-a...
katygb.bsky.social
And @himself.bsky.social and @hahrie.bsky.social on what much research on AI and democracy overlooks - the roles of politics and democratic publics: knightcolumbia.org/content/ai-a...
AI and Democratic Publics
knightcolumbia.org