Robert Chang
@korematsuctr.bsky.social
690 followers 350 following 87 posts
Professor of Law and Sylvia Mendez Presidential Chair for Civil Rights; founder and Executive Director, Fred T. Korematsu Center for Law and Equality at UC Irvine School of Law. Teacher, civil rights attorney, writer.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
korematsuctr.bsky.social
Tomorrow, SCOTUS hears argument in Chiles v. Salazar, a challenge to CO's ban on conversion therapy for minors. The Korematsu Center, joined by other race centers, filed an amicus brief supporting CO.

We remind Court that First Amendment was asserted to challenge civil rights for racial minorities.
Reposted by Robert Chang
veenadubal.bsky.social
WE WON: "This case -– perhaps the most important ever to fall w/in..this district court squarely presents the issue whether non-citizens lawfully present here in US..have the same free speech rights as the rest of us. The Court answers this Constitutional question unequivocally “yes, they do.”"
korematsuctr.bsky.social
ucirvinelaw.bsky.social
The Fred T. Korematsu Center for Law and Equality (@korematsuctr.bsky.social) at UCI Law, together with @newenglandinnocence.org & Friedman Kaplan Seiler Adelman & Robbins LLP, filed an amicus brief in Commonwealth v. Robinson before the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court.

bit.ly/47Qc7tc
White text box on a blue gradient background with the UCI Law wordmark in a yellow-and-blue circle. Text reads: “UC Irvine School of Law @ucilaw. The Fred T. Korematsu Center for Law & Equality filed an amicus brief in jury selection discrimination case before Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court.” Below, the UC Irvine Law wordmark and “Fred T. Korematsu Center for Law and Equality” appear in white.
korematsuctr.bsky.social
Free speech for thee ...
Reposted by Robert Chang
the14thcenter.bsky.social
Last night the 14th Amend Ctr had a terrific opening session on birthright citizenship w/historians Martha Jones & @kate.masur.TONIGHT is Part Two w/a great line-up of scholars & advocates. It’s not too late to register. howard.zoom.us/webinar/regi...
@aaldef.bsky.social @korematsuctr.bsky.social
Reposted by Robert Chang
ucirvinelaw.bsky.social
The Fred T. Korematsu Center for Law and Equality (@korematsuctr.bsky.social) at UCI Law, together with @newenglandinnocence.org & Friedman Kaplan Seiler Adelman & Robbins LLP, filed an amicus brief in Commonwealth v. Robinson before the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court.

bit.ly/47Qc7tc
White text box on a blue gradient background with the UCI Law wordmark in a yellow-and-blue circle. Text reads: “UC Irvine School of Law @ucilaw. The Fred T. Korematsu Center for Law & Equality filed an amicus brief in jury selection discrimination case before Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court.” Below, the UC Irvine Law wordmark and “Fred T. Korematsu Center for Law and Equality” appear in white.
Reposted by Robert Chang
jamellebouie.net
no surprised that brett ”almost certainly flunked his remedial classes” kavanaugh thinks the constitution authorizes a race-based federal “papers please” regime. quick, someone ask him what he thinks of the fugitive slave act.
chrisgeidner.bsky.social
This is a paragraph Brett Kavanaugh wrote on his little computer and then sent out into the world:

Moreover, as for stops of those individuals who are legally in the country, the questioning in those circumstances is typically brief, and those individuals may promptly go free after making clear to the immigration officers that they are U.S. citizens or otherwise legally in the United States.
Reposted by Robert Chang
kenwhite.bsky.social
Supreme Court Rules 6-3 That Fundamental Interests Of United States Of America Would Be Irreparably Harmed If It Race-Based Harassment And Detention By Masked Thugs Were Even Temporarily Halted
Reposted by Robert Chang
sifill.bsky.social
You can now register for the 14th Amendment Center’s webinars on birthright citizenship.
The sessions will be held on September 16th and 17th with a line-up of experts. REGISTER NOW:
howard.zoom.us/webinar/regi...
Reposted by Robert Chang
reichlinmelnick.bsky.social
On the absurd DOJ argument that Mr. Abrego Garcia should be held in criminal custody because otherwise ICE might deport him, the judge notes that “At bottom, the Government asks the Court to save it from itself because it may suffer irreparable harm completely of its own making.”
Government emphasizes that absent a stay, it will incur the irreparable injury of
Abrego possibly facing deportation from the United States pursuant to the immigration detainer lodged against him by DHS. If deported, the Government argues, the Department of Justice will
be deprived of the opportunity to pursue its criminal charges against Abrego. (Doc. No. 46 at 4).
At bottom, the Government asks the Court to save it from itself because it may suffer irreparable harm completely of its own making. This contravenes basic legal understanding of what constitutes "irreparable" harm for this analysis. See Sampson v. Murray, 415 U.S. 61, 90 (1974) The Government concedes that Abrego's impending deportation "would not be instantaneous." (Doc. No. 54 at 7). But this underscores who the Department of Justice should be
making these arguments to: DHS. If the Government finds this case to be as high priority as it
argues here, it is incumbent upon it to ensure that Abrego is held accountable for the charges in the Indictment. If the Department of Justice and DHS cannot do so, that speaks for itself.
Accordingly, this factor counsels against a stay, and all but dooms the Government's motion. See D.T. v. Sumner Cnty. Schs., 942 F.3d 324, 326-27 (6th Cir. 2019) ("even the strongest showing
on the other three factors cannot eliminate the irreparable harm requirement") (citation and
quotations omitted).
Reposted by Robert Chang
stevevladeck.bsky.social
Today’s unsigned, unexplained #SCOTUS ruling clearing the way for removals of migrants to third countries without any additional process is a disaster—not just on the merits, but because of the government misbehavior that it not only refuses to punish, but effectively rewards.

Me, via “One First”:
161. The Court's Disastrous Ruling in the Third-Country Removal Case
The majority did not just greenlight an especially odious immigration policy without any explanation; it did so in a case in which the government defied the district court—twice—with no consequence.
www.stevevladeck.com
korematsuctr.bsky.social
If nobody knows his plans, does that include himself?

Asking for the planet.
Reposted by Robert Chang
adambonin.bsky.social
It is impossible not to read this in conjunction with the Supreme Court's heartrbreaking, awful decision in Skrmetti allowing states to deny transgender teens the health care they need.
maggieastor.bsky.social
Breaking: The Trevor Project received a stop-work order last night on its contract with the national 988 suicide prevention hotline. The Trump administration is eliminating the option for LGBTQ callers to the hotline to press 3 and connect with someone who specializes in LGBTQ mental health.
Reposted by Robert Chang
profsteed.bsky.social
“We’re not banning them from these swimming pools on account of race, we’re banning them on account of the melanin levels in their skin.”
floralashes.bsky.social
The sheer level of logical contortion required to say that banning trans care “doesn’t exclude any individual from medical treatments on the basis of transgender status” is truly mind-blowing.
thetransfemininereview.com
Skirmetti just came back. 6-3 against healthcare for trans minors.

This is nauseating.
Reposted by Robert Chang
skyeperryman.bsky.social
Justice Sotomayor speaks for so many:

“The Court abandons transgender children and their families to political whims.

In sadness, I dissent.”
democracyforward.org
The SCOTUS decision in U.S. v Skrmetti is a devastating loss for transgender youth and their loved ones.

To the transgender community — you are not alone in this fight. We remain committed to ensuring all families can get the health care they need.
Reposted by Robert Chang
sifill.bsky.social
He said it. Yes.
ianbassin.bsky.social
"I have never seen a record where racial discrimination by the government is so palpable... Have we fallen so low? Have we no shame?" Judge Young (Reagan appointee) ruling in our favor against Trump research cuts.

Read more of the Judge's fiery language: www.ifyoucankeepit.org/p/breaking-n...
NIH grant funding restored
Judge rules grant terminations on the basis of DEI and gender identity are discriminatory and illegal
www.ifyoucankeepit.org
Reposted by Robert Chang
sifill.bsky.social
Horrifying. We are here.
esqueer.net
Sitting US Senator Alex Padilla forcibly wrestled to the ground and arrested by the FBI for attempting to ask a question of DHS secretary Kristin Noem.
Reposted by Robert Chang
scottjshapiro.bsky.social
What stage of capitalism is "Taking money from cancer research to pay for military vanity parade"?
Reposted by Robert Chang
manorajupd.bsky.social
Please read this @dailyjournalcorp.bsky.social op-ed about our office’s unacceptably high atty caseloads & why we're limiting the # of new cases we take on. Thanks to @seattleulaw.bsky.social's Prof. Robert Boruchowitz & @korematsuctr.bsky.social's Prof. Robert S. Chang. tinyurl.com/PubDefDJ
korematsuctr.bsky.social
Well - I had to cancel my ticket to see an early screening of the new John Wick spinoff this evening because of a last-minute amicus filing.

No regrets. I'll get to the theater in the next week or so to see the film. Working to fight executive overreach isn't something that can wait.
Reposted by Robert Chang
korematsuctr.bsky.social
It was a privilege to work with co-counsel to represent @jacl-national.bsky.social and the 63 other organizations that signed onto this brief with an urgent reminder to the court and to educate the public about the terrible things that can result when courts fail to check Executive overreach.
asianlawcaucus.org
On behalf of @jacl-national.bsky.social and 60+ organizations, @asianlawcaucus.org, @aaaj-aajc.bsky.social and the Fred T. Korematsu Center for Law and Equality filed an amicus brief asking the court to preserve the essential right to due process and ensure judicial review of executive orders.