Leandros Boukas
@leandrosboukas.bsky.social
140 followers 250 following 28 posts
Epigenetics/Gene regulation, Human Genetics, Population Genetics. Medical Genetics & Genomics Fellow at Harvard Medical School and Boston Children's Hospital. MD, PhD
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
leandrosboukas.bsky.social
yeah it's a very vanilla setting
leandrosboukas.bsky.social
That's amusing for sure. But still, the approach is imo quite interesting and there's interesting results, e.g. the lower MAE for dispersion.
Reposted by Leandros Boukas
greally.bsky.social
My book Epigenetics: History, Molecules and Diseases will be published in exactly one month (September 2).

Finalizing cover (looks great), probably going to printer this week.

Nervous anticipation is the mood right now.
Reposted by Leandros Boukas
oligogirl.bsky.social
#apaperaday is back from holiday. Yuzu is still with the birbsitter so a holiday picture it is. Today's pick is from @nejm.org by Musunuru et al on an N=1 case (patient with severe metabolic disease) treated by base editing (CRISPR therapy). DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2504747 Very good way to restart!
Reposted by Leandros Boukas
erictopol.bsky.social
This week's genome editing triumph is a big deal.
Here's why
erictopol.substack.com/p/the-first-...
Multiple headlines about the first CRISPR 2.0 personalized genome editing and photo of the baby treated
Reposted by Leandros Boukas
richardsever.bsky.social
Reminded of Ed Yong’s response to this question:

“If I cover a preprint, I talk to 2-3 experts to get their views before writing the story.

That’s exactly what I do if I cover a journal article…”
bioturbonick.net
Absolutely.

Preprints are for communicating among scientists.

If a journalist wants to cover one, they should commission a peer review.
chemjobber.bsky.social
Resolved: preprints should not be covered in the news, no matter how tantalizing the results are
leandrosboukas.bsky.social
Looking forward to this next week
fnucleosome.bsky.social
Join us on Wednesday next week for two exciting talks on transcription regulation from @kasitc.bsky.social and @davidsuter.bsky.social!

You can register at: us06web.zoom.us/webinar/regi...
leandrosboukas.bsky.social
Beautiful combination of population-scale genetic analyses and mouse work. Damaging variants in a highly constrained chromatin remodeler (CHD1) are better tolerated in males, with mouse experiments indicating a protective effect of androgens.
medrxivpreprint.bsky.social
Androgens mediate sexual dimorphism in Pilarowski-Bjornsson Syndrome https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.05.06.25326635v1
Reposted by Leandros Boukas
larsplus.bsky.social
Out in Cell @cp-cell.bsky.social: Design principles of cell-state-specific enhancers in hematopoiesis
🧬🩸 screen of fully synthetic enhancers in blood progenitors
🤖 AI that creates new cell state specific enhancers
🔍 negative synergies between TFs lead to specificity!
www.cell.com/cell/fulltex...
🧵
Design principles of cell-state-specific enhancers in hematopoiesis
Screen of minimalistic enhancers in blood progenitor cells demonstrates widespread dual activator-repressor function of transcription factors (TFs) and enables the model-guided design of cell-state-sp...
www.cell.com
Reposted by Leandros Boukas
Reposted by Leandros Boukas
mikelove.bsky.social
+1 Anshul

Part of this means reviewers not ripping on manuscripts that explicitly mention limitations *for those limitations*
Reposted by Leandros Boukas
anshulkundaje.bsky.social
Just a gentle reminder that deceptive hyping in scientific publications (which includes preprints) is actually antithetical to the core mission of the scientific process. We can stay grounded, truthful, humble while being ambitious. Revealing caveats, pitfalls & limitations speeds up progress.
Reposted by Leandros Boukas
gangfang.bsky.social
Great new review @natrevgenet.bsky.social by @sedlazeck.bsky.social @timp0.bsky.social and @yileifu.bsky.social! 👇highlighting both the promise of long read DNA methylation analysis and remaining challenges such as the difficulty to benchmark 5hmC and non-CG 5mC given their low abundance👏
yileifu.bsky.social
We summarized state-of-the-art computational methods for DNA methylation analysis using long-read sequencing, covering everything from base calling to sample-level, cell-type-level, and even population-scale analysis. Huge thanks to @sedlazeck.bsky.social and @timp0.bsky.social for this great work!
natrevgenet.nature.com
New online! Computational analysis of DNA methylation from long-read sequencing
Reposted by Leandros Boukas
Reposted by Leandros Boukas
tuuliel.bsky.social
I just the word epigenetics; it has so many meanings that it's next to useless. I prefer less ambigous terms: Epigenomic data for chromatin-related data (including methylation); gene regulatory mechanisms for the general phenomenon of how genes are regulated, etc.
Reposted by Leandros Boukas
wkhuber.bsky.social
The analogy of omics data normalization and cooking:
some processing is usually necessary, overcooking makes it bland, highly over-processed foods are unhealthy, and the quality of the ingredients matters.
leandrosboukas.bsky.social
Important to mention that duoNovo was developed and tested using sequencing data from the NIH-funded @gregor-research.bsky.social consortium

Feedback and comments are especially welcome - as I mentioned earlier, we really hope that duoNovo can be broadly useful (n/n)
leandrosboukas.bsky.social
In the preprint we show that this simple approach performs very well in practice. Among rare variants - which are of course the most likely to be disease-causing - duoNovo has perfect accuracy in our evaluations (7/n)
leandrosboukas.bsky.social
Then, using just one parent, we can tell whether the haplotype containing a given variant of interest was inherited from the available parent. If that's the case, then the variant must be de novo - we don't need to look at the other parent. (6/n)
leandrosboukas.bsky.social
Our method solves this problem using a simple idea. We first reconstruct haplotypes using read-backed phasing enabled by long read sequencing. This allows us to phase variants that we want to test for de novo status (which isn't possible with non-read-backed phasing approaches). (5/n)
leandrosboukas.bsky.social
Which is why de novo status is used as a strong criterion of variant pathogenicity.

However, to identify a variant as de novo, both biological parents have to be sequenced. For millions of families, this is impossible for a variety of reasons. (4/n)