Lexsar
@lexsar.bsky.social
White cis gendered boomer man (Gen Jones), supporting democracy, freedom and equality. Do not obey in advance
Yes. There should be a detailed and complete review of his service
Cotton claims to have been in the military.
Should we look back at any potentially sinister events during his service?
Should we look back at any potentially sinister events during his service?
December 5, 2025 at 4:26 PM
Yes. There should be a detailed and complete review of his service
Reposted by Lexsar
Reposted by Lexsar
YEP. The laws regarding insurrection and rebellion only apply if you fail. the victors do not prosecute themselves.
November 29, 2025 at 3:48 PM
YEP. The laws regarding insurrection and rebellion only apply if you fail. the victors do not prosecute themselves.
Reposted by Lexsar
I was told by this guy there would be no more wars. He’d be the no more wars president. He’d also end the Russia Ukraine war on day one with one phone call.
November 29, 2025 at 4:33 PM
I was told by this guy there would be no more wars. He’d be the no more wars president. He’d also end the Russia Ukraine war on day one with one phone call.
Reposted by Lexsar
If no lessons have been learned from the two previous impeachments: December 18, 2019, and the second time on January 13, 2021; then any subsequent impeachments will not end in convictions. It is truly sad to lose our democracy.
Impeachment is nothing without conviction in the senate.
November 21, 2025 at 6:04 PM
If no lessons have been learned from the two previous impeachments: December 18, 2019, and the second time on January 13, 2021; then any subsequent impeachments will not end in convictions. It is truly sad to lose our democracy.
Whose idea was this? Who approved this change?
Dear Government Employees,
Leaks help...sometimes.
Respectfully yours,
A desperate American public: www.washingtonpost.com/national-sec...
Leaks help...sometimes.
Respectfully yours,
A desperate American public: www.washingtonpost.com/national-sec...
In reversal, Coast Guard again classifies swastikas, nooses as hate symbols
The new order came hours after The Post reported the service would instead classify such symbols “potentially divisive” under guidelines set for release next month.
www.washingtonpost.com
November 21, 2025 at 5:30 PM
Whose idea was this? Who approved this change?
Reposted by Lexsar
Just to review, in the last week the President of the United States:
- Refused to condemn the rise of Neo-Nazis in his party
- Tried to block the release of further evidence he sexually abused children
- Encouraged the execution of Congressional Democrats
Those are just factual statements.
- Refused to condemn the rise of Neo-Nazis in his party
- Tried to block the release of further evidence he sexually abused children
- Encouraged the execution of Congressional Democrats
Those are just factual statements.
November 20, 2025 at 5:51 PM
Just to review, in the last week the President of the United States:
- Refused to condemn the rise of Neo-Nazis in his party
- Tried to block the release of further evidence he sexually abused children
- Encouraged the execution of Congressional Democrats
Those are just factual statements.
- Refused to condemn the rise of Neo-Nazis in his party
- Tried to block the release of further evidence he sexually abused children
- Encouraged the execution of Congressional Democrats
Those are just factual statements.
Reposted by Lexsar
Reposted by Lexsar
The top three things Jesus was on about were feeding the hungry, healing the sick, and welcoming the stranger. Rich men have convinced so-called Christians to starve the hungry, gut health care, and deport the stranger to enrich themselves. It’s astoundingly anti-Christ.
October 31, 2025 at 5:02 AM
The top three things Jesus was on about were feeding the hungry, healing the sick, and welcoming the stranger. Rich men have convinced so-called Christians to starve the hungry, gut health care, and deport the stranger to enrich themselves. It’s astoundingly anti-Christ.
Oh, but they are that shallow and weak
This why I don’t sleep at night. Because he nailed it right on the head. And I don’t understand the Republicans in Congress who turn a blind eye to the destruction of something that I know they value. They can’t possibly be that shallow and weak.
October 29, 2025 at 11:02 AM
Oh, but they are that shallow and weak
We should keep it and use it for the Nuremburg 2 trials, at least
You know, I've seen a lot of "so we need to figure out how to tear the ballroom down after he's gone" but I think that's not the way to go. The building will be there, and tearing it back down would be needlessly performative and wasteful.
October 27, 2025 at 8:50 PM
We should keep it and use it for the Nuremburg 2 trials, at least
Reposted by Lexsar
Prime example of white privilege in plain sight.
Black kids get called adults to justify blame, while white adults get called “kids” to excuse their hate. They’re not boys and girls, they’re grown-ass men and women, and the receipts are in writing.
Black kids get called adults to justify blame, while white adults get called “kids” to excuse their hate. They’re not boys and girls, they’re grown-ass men and women, and the receipts are in writing.
October 20, 2025 at 2:03 AM
Prime example of white privilege in plain sight.
Black kids get called adults to justify blame, while white adults get called “kids” to excuse their hate. They’re not boys and girls, they’re grown-ass men and women, and the receipts are in writing.
Black kids get called adults to justify blame, while white adults get called “kids” to excuse their hate. They’re not boys and girls, they’re grown-ass men and women, and the receipts are in writing.
Reposted by Lexsar
I still can’t forget Vought saying when telling everyone about their fascist manifesto: it will remain bloodless if the left allows it to be.
October 10, 2025 at 8:18 PM
I still can’t forget Vought saying when telling everyone about their fascist manifesto: it will remain bloodless if the left allows it to be.
This is an important encapsulation of the scale of what our situation is now
We need to stop referencing everything back to Watergate. We’ve had an insurrection and some 2000+ felons convicted of same since then.We’ve had nothing in our past that even minusculy compares to what we have now.A complicit congressional body, a complicit SC and a mentally defective man in charge
September 21, 2025 at 4:15 PM
This is an important encapsulation of the scale of what our situation is now
Reposted by Lexsar
“There is no Constitutional Crisis" is exactly what someone would say if they created a Constitutional crisis.
September 5, 2025 at 10:49 AM
“There is no Constitutional Crisis" is exactly what someone would say if they created a Constitutional crisis.
Reposted by Lexsar
We had a congressional confirmation hearing for the Secretary of Defense position. Not war. They should be forced to do it again.
September 6, 2025 at 9:30 PM
We had a congressional confirmation hearing for the Secretary of Defense position. Not war. They should be forced to do it again.
Reposted by Lexsar
Oh, so guns *do* kill people? Gotcha.
September 4, 2025 at 10:34 PM
Oh, so guns *do* kill people? Gotcha.
Reposted by Lexsar
"The lunatics are running the asylum."
August 31, 2025 at 5:23 PM
"The lunatics are running the asylum."
Reposted by Lexsar
Reposted by Lexsar
Neil deGrass Tyson: "How sad it must be believing that scientists, historians, scholars, economists, journalists devoted their entire lives to deceiving you, but a reality-TV star proven in court to be a lying felon is your beacon of truth & honesty"
August 23, 2025 at 4:26 PM
Neil deGrass Tyson: "How sad it must be believing that scientists, historians, scholars, economists, journalists devoted their entire lives to deceiving you, but a reality-TV star proven in court to be a lying felon is your beacon of truth & honesty"
Reposted by Lexsar
PSA: Don’t forget to “ask yourselves this question daily”
August 19, 2025 at 2:47 PM
PSA: Don’t forget to “ask yourselves this question daily”
Reposted by Lexsar
Thank you, Boston Globe. This is how it's done.
August 19, 2025 at 10:47 AM
Thank you, Boston Globe. This is how it's done.
Reposted by Lexsar
Americans v. Americans
Using U.S. Border Patrol, police and ICE against U.S. citizens is wild.
Using U.S. Border Patrol, police and ICE against U.S. citizens is wild.
August 9, 2025 at 1:54 AM
Americans v. Americans
Using U.S. Border Patrol, police and ICE against U.S. citizens is wild.
Using U.S. Border Patrol, police and ICE against U.S. citizens is wild.