lmsymans.bsky.social
@lmsymans.bsky.social
Reposted
“You were born a boy. If you want to say you’re a woman, fine, but why should I have to go along with your delusion?”

Like how we all have to go along living and working with people who will literally die for the idea an invisible man lives in the sky and has preordained our lives?
September 30, 2025 at 11:24 PM
Reposted
September 30, 2025 at 1:01 AM
Reposted
People over here saying “don’t be divisive” like I want to be united with Charlie Kirk’s white supremacist following 😂

Bitch, the division is the point.
September 14, 2025 at 2:12 PM
Reposted
Girl we’ve wanted to split up ever since yall decided school shootings were a fair trade for the 2A. Let the divorce proceedings proceed procedurally 😂
September 10, 2025 at 8:44 PM
Reposted
Question for the white liberals who have written columns praising Charlie Kirk in the name of "free speech."

Where are you columns actually DEFENDING THE FREE SPEECH of people who are being fired for [checks notes] quoting Charlie Kirk? (Which most of you white praisers didn't have the guts to do)
September 15, 2025 at 6:54 PM
Reposted
Pointing out Charlie Kirk's hate speech is not hate speech. It's objective reporting. Apologize to Matthew Dowd and rehire him.

A full-throated embrace of genocide is hate speech – beyond all measure. Fire Brian Kilmeade. Immediately.
September 14, 2025 at 2:13 AM
Reposted
You do not in fact have to praise the guy who said homeless people should be murdered with lethal injections and then apologized four days later to save his job. Let's get a grip here.
Brian Kilmeade deserves praise for his apology.
Brian Kilmeade apologized for his comments about homeless people getting lethal injections this morning on Fox & Friends, saying "so many homeless people deserve our empathy and compassion."

Here's the clip of his apology 👇
September 14, 2025 at 2:15 PM
Reposted
it does seem weird to declare war on people and then demand they mourn your dead
September 14, 2025 at 2:36 PM
Reposted
September 13, 2025 at 3:57 AM
Reposted
Matthew Dowd was fired for accurately saying Kirk was divisive. Yet Kilmeade will face zero repercussions for saying we should euthanize the homeless. Liberals and any sane human has every right to be upset about the current climate.
Brian Kilmeade calls for mass murder and it's ok because the bar is so low for right wing whites.
September 13, 2025 at 5:48 PM
Reposted
"Healthy debate" = when I criticize you

"Cancel culture" = when you criticize me
September 13, 2025 at 1:41 PM
Reposted
reposting with alt text because this feels incredibly significant. the right-wing disinfo machine means a lot of the people grieving Charlie Kirk never heard any of the things he said that would have tarnished his brand as Guy Who Just Wants to Have Dialogue Across the Aisle
September 13, 2025 at 9:24 PM
Reposted
This post that a friend of my partner's shared on FB potentially explains the Kristin Chenoweth thing, and is frightening.
September 13, 2025 at 8:59 AM
Reposted
This you? Just two hours later?
September 13, 2025 at 6:38 PM
Reposted
The fact that Matthew Dowd lost his job for pointing out Charlie Kirk’s hate speech, while Brian Kilmeade openly suggests we should euthanize the homeless and there is zero outrage, shows exactly what is terribly wrong with today’s political mainstream media.
September 13, 2025 at 8:35 PM
Reposted
What's your secret to being online all the time without contracting computer madness? For me it's being pure of heart
September 13, 2025 at 4:11 AM
Reposted
In a shocking on-air moment, a “Fox and Friends” co-host said homeless people suffering from mental health issues who refuse help should be killed
'Just Kill 'Em': Fox Host Makes Shocking Comment On Homeless People
"Fox and Friends" co-host Brian Kilmeade made a jaw-dropping remark while discussing homelessness and mental health.
www.huffpost.com
September 13, 2025 at 6:00 PM
Reposted
The Wall Street Journal. The Guardian. All the other outlets who failed to confirm their reporting.

I want to see fewer cowardly, shrugging "editor's notes" on these stories and more statements of "wow, we really failed in our reporting on a grave matter, and here's how we're going to do better."
September 13, 2025 at 2:48 PM
Reposted
When you write a piece noting that a guy promoted racism and violence, his followers immediately prove you right
September 13, 2025 at 1:28 PM
Reposted
After the Minnesota shooting Senior DOJ officials started weighing proposals to limit transgender people's right to possess firearms.

After the Kirk shooting, I look forward to the DOJ's proposal to limit white men's ability to possess firearms.

Wait, what do you mean that's not how it works???🤔
September 13, 2025 at 1:38 AM
Reposted
I’m curious. If an outspoken atheist was to set up tables outside churches on Sunday and on campuses of Christian colleges with a sign that said “God doesn’t exist, prove me wrong,” would that person be hailed as a figure who was trying to engage in good faith debate and heal our divisions?
September 13, 2025 at 2:37 PM
Reposted
fuck your "focusing on the positive" if it means ignoring, suppressing or distorting reality and folding for fascism
September 13, 2025 at 11:15 AM
Reposted
I cited actual Kirk quotes where he calls Black women less intelligent, demonizes me for being Muslim, & dehumanizes LGBTQ people—& his supporters are upset at me for “speaking evil of the dead.”

If quoting him is “speaking evil” maybe ask yourself why you followed someone who believed evil things.
September 12, 2025 at 3:24 PM