Luca Rigotti
@lucarigotti.bsky.social
660 followers 480 following 180 posts
Theoretical Economist at the University of Pittsburgh https://sites.pitt.edu/~luca/
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by Luca Rigotti
tderyugina.bsky.social
The letter is ready, thanks to all those who helped out! Starting to gather signature now, please consider signing (link at top of letter) & spread the word.

docs.google.com/document/d/1...
Reposted by Luca Rigotti
phastidio.net
Dirò una cosa assai poco originale: se i mercati, in particolare in questo momento quello obbligazionario, non gli si rivoltano contro di fronte all'assalto alla Fed, Trump andrà fino in fondo. Gli unici checks and balances per lui verranno (ove mai) dal mercato.
Seasonally, I would imagine
Reposted by Luca Rigotti
johncawley.bsky.social
If you'll be on the #EconJobMarket this coming year, you may want to join this webinar by @aereorg.bsky.social, titled, "Navigating Uncertain Waters: Advice for the Current Job Market," with Min Gong & @adrienneohler.bsky.social. 29 Sept 2025 @ 11am ET.
What's my room number?
Need to add acid bath concrete pilon to the list of weapons
Reposted by Luca Rigotti
yaleeconomics.bsky.social
Join us in congratulating Steven Berry (@steveberry.bsky.social), who was recently appointed the Sterling Professor of Economics—the highest academic honor a Yale professor can receive.

Berry joined Yale in 1988 and is the inaugural director of the
Yale Tobin Center: news.yale.edu/2025/07/22/b...
Archdukes died for much smaller offenses
Reminded me of my own ceremony, a few years back
Reposted by Luca Rigotti
filipecampante.bsky.social
Even the most hardened haters will have to admit that yesterday was awesome at the CWC (Messi + PSG loss). Again establishing the ancestral truth: Fifa sucks, but football is awesome, and always triumphs.
But then you point out to them that you live in Turin...
With more than one airline (a small airline called Neos is the other)
Reposted by Luca Rigotti
andrewkosenko.bsky.social
Werner Von Braun would like a word.

Also, do the Manhattan Project.

Von Neumann, Fermi, Szilard, Wigner - and Einstein, whose letter got the ball rolling. To name just a few.

Or American mathematics: Courant, Kac, Lax, Wald...
The description below, from this week's @adamprz.bsky.social Diary, strikes me as very plausible.
In somewhat stylized terms, what may be happening with the Trump regime goes as follows. There is a Leader (Duce, Führer, Vozdh) who demands absolute loyalty from his subordinates. The subordinates know that they will be rewarded for implementing the will of the Leader. They compete for his attention. Lines demarcating their authority do not matter: the head of HHS Department tries to catch Leader's attention by doing something that formally can be done only by DoE Department and if the Leader notices and likes this action, the head of the HHS jumps in his approval above the head of DoE. Sometimes the subordinates go farther than the Leader would want; sometimes they do something the Leader does not approve. Such mistakes, however, are not due to a lack of expertise, but only the uncertainty inherent in the impossibility of the Leader to fully articulate his will. Sometimes the Leader has to step in to adjudicate conflicts. Some of his underlings may be pushing tariffs while others may want free trade; some may be concerned about deficits while others believe that they will pay for themselves. Moreover, envy and jealousy cannot be avoided when the underlings compete for the Leader's favor. Mussolini claimed that resolving such conflicts took most of his time. Yet, whenever loyalty is the only criterion of performance, chaos must ensue. The only purpose of the subordinates is to please the Leader. Formal authority, consideration of material consequences, or compassion have no place in their competition.
Italy: the country with the most colorful elections
Reposted by Luca Rigotti
Be a theorist. At worst, your theorem is wrong and everyone thinks you're a moron... Still better than everyone discovering you're a fraudster and a cheat.
Be a theorist. At worst, your theorem is wrong and everyone thinks you're a moron... Still better than everyone discovering you're a fraudster and a cheat.