Michael W. Cole
@mwcole.bsky.social
1.8K followers 410 following 56 posts
Professor, director of neuroscience lab at Rutgers University – neuroimaging, cognitive control, network neuroscience Writing book “Brain Flows: How Network Dynamics Generate The Human Mind” for Princeton University Press https://www.colelab.org
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
mwcole.bsky.social
Lab’s latest is out in Imaging Neuroscience, led by Kirsten Peterson: “Regularized partial correlation provides reliable functional connectivity estimates while correcting for widespread confounding”, where we demonstrate a major improvement to standard fMRI functional connectivity (correlation) 1/n
Reposted by Michael W. Cole
mwcole.bsky.social
mwcole.bsky.social
The graphical lasso functional connectivity approach that performed best in the paper can be implemented using the Activity Flow Toolbox: colelab.github.io/ActflowToolb...
And also using the paper's code release: github.com/ColeLab/Reli... [12/n]
ActflowToolbox
colelab.github.io
mwcole.bsky.social
I think both of those explanations are plausible. I co-authored a paper on functional/effective connectivity in 2019 that may be helpful: Reid et al. (2019). "Advancing functional connectivity research from association to causation". Nature Neuroscience. www.colelab.org/pubs/Reid201...
www.colelab.org
mwcole.bsky.social
Ideally, regularized partial correlation would have become the default back then. Instead, 90%+ of studies have continued to use pairwise correlations, especially with fMRI. I think one reason is that the advantages of the new approach hadn't been shown clearly, which is what we try to do here.
mwcole.bsky.social
The graphical lasso functional connectivity approach that performed best in the paper can be implemented using the Activity Flow Toolbox: colelab.github.io/ActflowToolb...
And also using the paper's code release: github.com/ColeLab/Reli... [12/n]
ActflowToolbox
colelab.github.io
mwcole.bsky.social
And regularization improved prediction of individual differences in demographics (age) and behavior/cognition (general intelligence) relative to standard partial correlation. The glasso results were more interpretable than pairwise correlation (fewer false connections) 10/n
mwcole.bsky.social
Also empirical, prediction of task-evoked activity (via activity flow modeling) was better with regularized partial correlation 9/n
mwcole.bsky.social
As another empirical validation, regularized partial correlation was much less susceptible to motion artifacts than pairwise correlation. Percent connections linked to motion = Pairwise correlation FC: 56.4% vs. graphical lasso FC: 0.01% 8/n
mwcole.bsky.social
First empirical validation: regularized partial correlation was much closer to structural connectivity, which doesn’t have the causal confounding problem (despite other issues) 7/n
mwcole.bsky.social
This pattern of results was mirrored in empirical resting-state fMRI data across 4 validation measures. Regularization was key to estimating individual subject-level networks with reduced confounding. 6/n
mwcole.bsky.social
In simulations, pairwise (standard) correlation led to many false connections, but so did partial correlation. Regularized partial correlation (glasso) better recovered the true network organization 5/n
mwcole.bsky.social
We hypothesized that low reliability of partial correlation is due to overfitting to noise, with regularization (model simplification) improving reliability. 4/n
mwcole.bsky.social
Pairwise correlations are known to be susceptible to false positives in theory. For example, region A causing activity in unconnected regions B and C (B<-A->C) can lead to a false B-C connection. Partial correlation can correct for this error, but not reliably 3/n
mwcole.bsky.social
In brief: Improvements to pairwise (standard) correlation: 1) reduced false connections (confounding), 2) reduced sensitivity to in-scanner motion, 3) better correspondence to task-related activity, and 4) more interpretable links with individual differences in behavior 2/n
mwcole.bsky.social
Lab’s latest is out in Imaging Neuroscience, led by Kirsten Peterson: “Regularized partial correlation provides reliable functional connectivity estimates while correcting for widespread confounding”, where we demonstrate a major improvement to standard fMRI functional connectivity (correlation) 1/n
Reposted by Michael W. Cole
imagingneurosci.bsky.social
New paper in Imaging Neuroscience by Malte R. Güth, Travis E. Baker, et al:

Right posterior theta reflects human parahippocampal phase resetting by salient cues during goal-directed navigation

doi.org/10.1162/IMAG...
Reposted by Michael W. Cole
sagan.bsky.social
Ask courageous questions.
Do not be satisfied with superficial answers. Be open to wonder and at the same time subject all claims to knowledge, without exception, to critical scrutiny.
Be aware of human fallibility.
Cherish your species and your planet.

- Carl Sagan.
Reposted by Michael W. Cole
drdamienfair.bsky.social
I still get chills

Meet Mike
*30+ years severe depression
*first hospitalized @ 13y
*20 meds
*3 rounds of ECT
*2 near-fatal suicide attempts

Mike felt joy for the first time in decades after we turned on his new brain pacemaker or PACE

see videos, read paper, follow thread
doi.org/10.31234/osf...
Reposted by Michael W. Cole
pessoabrain.bsky.social
“Top-down and bottom-up neuroscience: overcoming the clash of research cultures”
doi.org/10.1038/s415...
Small contribution in this piece by @frosas.bsky.social and colleagues on how we need both types of research culture in neuroscience.
#neuroskyence
mwcole.bsky.social
Maybe being anxious is a sign of being a good scientist? Accurate theories/hypotheses should stand up to many tests developed from a skeptical perspective. Starting from empirical constraints & modeling their interaction can help keep theories grounded, perhaps increasing the odds they'll be correct
mwcole.bsky.social
Once you have a flow model that generates a phenomenon of interest, you can lesion each empirical constraint (e.g., each connection or task-evoked activation) to determine which contributed to generation of that phenomenon. Follow-up empirical stimulation or lesion work can further verify this.
mwcole.bsky.social
I agree these are vexing problems that need more solutions. An approach that's working for us is to integrate empirical constraints into generative models. Connectivity and task response data used to form activity flow models (empirical neural networks). Details here: www.colelab.org/pubs/2024_Ac...
www.colelab.org
Reposted by Michael W. Cole
timkietzmann.bsky.social
Exciting new preprint from the lab: “Adopting a human developmental visual diet yields robust, shape-based AI vision”. A most wonderful case where brain inspiration massively improved AI solutions.

Work with @zejinlu.bsky.social @sushrutthorat.bsky.social and Radek Cichy

arxiv.org/abs/2507.03168
arxiv.org
Reposted by Michael W. Cole
donnerlab.bsky.social
1/ New paper by Hame Park, (@AraziAyelet), Bharath Talluri, Marco Celotto, Stefano Panzeri, Alan Stocker & Tobias Donner published in Nature Communications – “Confirmation Bias through Selective Readout of Information Encoded in Human Parietal Cortex”: rdcu.be/etlR7. Here is a summary:
Confirmation bias through selective readout of information encoded in human parietal cortex
Nature Communications - People often discard incoming information when it contradicts their pre-existing beliefs about the world. Here, the authors show that this discarded information is precisely...
rdcu.be