Nat Duffus
@natduffus.bsky.social
260 followers 89 following 27 posts
PhD student at University of Oxford investigating the ecological outcomes of Biodiversity Net Gain in England she/her 🏳️‍🌈🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
natduffus.bsky.social
this post tells such a story...
Reposted by Nat Duffus
carladenyer.bsky.social
Wish I could say I was shocked, but here's the Labour government constraining the right to peaceful protest again...

'You can protest but only according to our rules. The rules are: you're not allowed to use any of the tactics that make protest effective.'
peterwalker99.bsky.social
NEW: Home Office announces planned new anti-protest powers, mainly aimed at pro-Gaza protests like those for Palestine Action. Police will be able to consider the "cumulative impact" of repeated protests and potentially order that they be relocated.
Reposted by Nat Duffus
Reposted by Nat Duffus
kateraworth.bsky.social
Big Doughnutty News.
Just out in Nature: the all-new 2025 Doughnut. Transformed from a single-year snapshot to an annual global monitor of 21st century social & ecological thriving. Available to all in an open-access paper by @andrewlfanning.bsky.social and me. 🧵 1/
www.nature.com/articles/s41...
Reposted by Nat Duffus
iccs.bsky.social
🚨Women are central to tropical wild meat systems, yet too often overlooked🚨

A new paper led by @jasminwillis.bsky.social, Dr Lauren Coad, @orchiddelirium.bsky.social & @ejmilnergulland.bsky.social reviewed 334 studies across 54 countries, finding women occupy 36 roles, from harvesting to trade.
natduffus.bsky.social
Congrats! Sticker time! :') 🪲
Reposted by Nat Duffus
profbillmcguire.bsky.social
"Today, we clear a soccer field’s worth of tropical forest every six seconds, a loss dramatically worsened by humanity’s growing hunger for meat"

Wean ourselves off meat now, or the switch to a Pliocene climate that's locked in will do it for us

www.theguardian.com/environment/...
Meat is a leading emissions source – but few outlets report on it, analysis finds
Sentient Media reveals less than 4% of climate news stories mention animal agriculture as source of carbon emissions
www.theguardian.com
Reposted by Nat Duffus
defendourjuries.bsky.social
Police continue to mass arrest protestors for opposing genocide and the Palestine Action ban.

The day after the ban came into force, 29 were arrested. Last month, it was 500.

Today, over a thousand people are defying the unjust proscription of a domestic direct action group.
Reposted by Nat Duffus
richardfoxbc.bsky.social
Cool new research by @e-ellis1.bsky.social Moths & hoverflies are more sensitive to urbanisation than bees, but urban trees boost moth species richness in UK cities. #teammoth 🌍 royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/...
Reposted by Nat Duffus
linneansociety.bsky.social
Our upcoming Queer Ecology evening will be a real treat, with a special guided tour exploring the diversity of nature and its interpretation by scientists throughout history.

📍 Linnean Society
📆 6pm 25 September
🎟️ £15 (discounts for Members and concessions)
Queer Ecology Evening at the Linnean Society
A special guided tour exploring the diversity of nature and its interpretation by scientists throughout history.
buff.ly
Reposted by Nat Duffus
jeremybartlett.bsky.social
A romantic meeting of Wasp Spiders, Argiope bruennichi, at Thompson Common yesterday.

The male is much smaller than the big, stripy female.

They ended up going out to lunch afterwards, when he became the main course.

srs.britishspiders.org.uk/portal.php/p...

#Spiders #UKWildlife
Wasp Spiders, Argiope bruennichi. A big stripy female in her web, with visiting male spider (near her head). Wasp Spiders, Argiope bruennichi. A big stripy female in her web, with visiting male spider (near her back leg).
Reposted by Nat Duffus
biology.ox.ac.uk
Congratulations to @natduffus.bsky.social, who has been commended in the @mplsoxford.bsky.social Impact Awards!

Nat has been recognised in the Early Career Policy Impact category for raising awareness of the ecological outcomes of Biodiversity Net Gain 👇
bit.ly/4eSmRZe
Natalie Duffus commended in MPLS Impact Awards 2025
bit.ly
natduffus.bsky.social
If you're an ecologist (or just care about nature), then I'd strongly urge you to respond to this consultation with your views! I think the proposed changes to the SSM coupled with the proposed increased scope of the SSM could lead to some terrible ecological outcomes. 9/9
natduffus.bsky.social
But I really question the assumptions behind fixing habitat condition at poor at baseline? Small sites are not inherently of low ecological quality, so surely a more precautionary approach to fixing habitat condition would be appropriate? 8/
natduffus.bsky.social
... and "moderate" for the target condition of enhanced habitats. Given the challenges facing the delivery of small, non-secured, non-significant, on-site habitat enhancements, I'm broadly supportive of fixing the enhancement condition at moderate or indeed poor. 7/
natduffus.bsky.social
But if development must occur there, then it should *not* be using a metric which uses the above proposed habitat 'classification' system.

The SSM also does not require an on-the-ground condition assessment and this consultation proposes fixing the condition at "poor" for baseline habitats 6/
natduffus.bsky.social
Furthermore, the consultation asks whether the SSM should be used on sites with protected habitats or species. I'd point to the mitigation hierarchy and suggest that development does not happen on these sites to begin with. 5/
natduffus.bsky.social
I seriously question what system could be devised where non-ecologists can easily identify the habitats. What is left? Grassland, woodland, wetland, or scrub? Surely the solution here is upskilling and more guidance, not stripping out any ecology from a metric intended to measure biodiversity? 4/
natduffus.bsky.social
I worry that this would result in all habitats being replaced with what is cheap to deliver and affords the most units - e.g. the already ubiquitous other neutral grassland. There is also a review proposed, to "ensure that all habitats within the SSM can be easily identified by non-ecologists". 3/
natduffus.bsky.social
There are proposed changes to the trading rules which would either remove them entirely, or allow the loss of any medium distinctiveness habitat to be compensated with any other medium distinctiveness habitat (the SSM only covers low and medium dis. habitats). 2/
natduffus.bsky.social
Having had time to digest the new BNG consultation, I am *astounded* at the proposed changes to the small sites metric (SSM). If the changes are implemented, the SSM could apply to developments up to 49 dwellings/1ha - affecting a lot of developments! 1/ consult.defra.gov.uk/defra-biodiv...
consult.defra.gov.uk
natduffus.bsky.social
Very disappointing to see the govt not only cut funding for nature-friendly farming schemes but ALSO lay out a consultation on changes to BNG which would reduce the requirement for the majority of developments to compensate for their impacts on nature.

www.wildlifetrusts.org/news/governm...
Government digs grave for wildlife | The Wildlife Trusts
New proposals on Biodiversity Net Gain from UK Government will harm whole communities so that a few can profit more.
www.wildlifetrusts.org
Reposted by Nat Duffus
adrianramsay.bsky.social
What part of nature emergency does the government not understand? These attacks on nature keep on coming.

In a biodiversity crisis, the Govt should be expanding the nature friendly farming programme, not cutting it.
www.theguardian.com/environment/...
Fund for nature-friendly farming to be slashed in UK spending review
Exclusive: Defra sources say scheme, which pays farmers to protect nature, will be targeted at ‘small farms’
www.theguardian.com
Reposted by Nat Duffus
rspb.bsky.social
Labour promised to restore nature. ❌

Instead, their Planning Bill contains a licence to destroy it.

We offered solutions. We’re done waiting.

Part 3 of the Bill would gut the laws protecting our most precious habitats & species.

Without significant change, it must be scrapped.
Screenshot of a Guardian news article with the headline: “Wildlife charities urge Labour to scrap ‘licence to kill nature’ in planning bill.” The subheading reads: “Conservationists say part of bill allowing developers to avoid environmental laws by paying into nature fund should be ditched.” Below, a protest photo shows handmade signs in woodland. One reads “BAT FACTS – 14 species of bat in Buckinghamshire. Bats are the only mammals that can fly.” Another says “FAT CATS KILL BATS” in bold letters. The image underscores public anger and the scale of opposition to the proposed Planning Bill.