omicron-0b.bsky.social
@omicron-0b.bsky.social
Reposted
January 1, 2026 at 12:27 AM
Reposted
This is 100% rape.

It's a textbook definition of a breach of consent laws (which I studied at University).

"a material deception perpetrated on the complainant by the suspect" renders consent of the victim at the time to not be true consent.

Any failure to charge and convict him is corruption.
December 17, 2025 at 8:35 PM
Reposted
same fake fucking country ruled by inbred nazis put a trans woman away for 'deceptively' giving a guy dome but this guy is getting a slap on the wrist for actually raping someone
December 18, 2025 at 9:33 PM
Reposted
We’ve today formally written to multiple public bodies about BBC reporting on transgender people.

Here’s who we’ve contacted and why. 1/6
December 23, 2025 at 4:46 PM
Reposted
To smear Dale Vince the BBC deliberately omits the appalling Netanyahu comments he responded to: “Your call for a Palestinian state pours fuel on the antisemitic fire. It rewards Hamas terrorists. It emboldens those who menace Australian Jews and encourages the Jew hatred now stalking your streets.”
Wes Streeting condemns Labour donor Dale Vince's Bondi attack remarks
Businessman Dale Vince has faced a backlash for saying Israel's PM
www.bbc.co.uk
December 18, 2025 at 7:37 AM
Reposted
The time politicians spend wilfully misinterpreting those trying to unpack the causes of the appalling rise in anti-semitism would be better spent (better for those who care about their Jewish family and friends and colleagues) unpacking those causes. Because that's the only way to address them.
To smear Dale Vince the BBC deliberately omits the appalling Netanyahu comments he responded to: “Your call for a Palestinian state pours fuel on the antisemitic fire. It rewards Hamas terrorists. It emboldens those who menace Australian Jews and encourages the Jew hatred now stalking your streets.”
Wes Streeting condemns Labour donor Dale Vince's Bondi attack remarks
Businessman Dale Vince has faced a backlash for saying Israel's PM
www.bbc.co.uk
December 18, 2025 at 7:44 AM
Reposted
"It is concerning that NHS England, in its response, does not commit to an increase in resources to enable these recommendations": @jessothomson.co.uk, of the Levy Review.
The Levy Review has been published | Good Law Project
We analyse the findings and implications of NHS England’s review of adult trans healthcare, published today.
goodlaw.social
December 18, 2025 at 8:22 PM
Reposted
This is basically true. It's a good, ambitious, thoughtful and hugely needed strategy but ultimately the measure of whether Labour really cares about it is whether it is backing it with money and, meaningfully, it isn't. www.theguardian.com/society/2025...
UK government strategy to protect women and girls from violence ‘seriously underfunded’
Campaigners welcome plans but say poor funding means Labour’s ambitions unlikely to be met
www.theguardian.com
December 18, 2025 at 8:47 PM
Reposted
"One Whitehall source told The Telegraph there is a growing belief that if the Good Law Project wins its case, Ms Phillipson will tell the EHRC to reconsider its guidance."

Well, yes, because it will be unlawful.
Phillipson blocks trans rules protecting safe spaces for women
Minister is challenging guidance that would require businesses and public bodies to offer female-only lavatories
www.telegraph.co.uk
December 18, 2025 at 9:55 PM
Reposted
The papers are slowly waking up to quite how significant is @goodlawproject.bsky.social's challenge to the transphobic EHRC's interim guidance. If we succeed it's hard to see how its draft statutory guidance can be lawful.
December 19, 2025 at 7:26 AM
Reposted
When political lies meet economic reality: Reform, which promised to keep Council tax low and cut spending, then increased it by the maximum permissible, and still its deficit is skyrocketing. www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/poli...
Reform UK council’s budget reveals ‘gaping’ £60 million deficit
Kent County Council (KCC), faces a projected debt increase of tens of millions of pounds, even with maximum council tax hikes
www.independent.co.uk
December 19, 2025 at 8:26 AM
Reposted
Just in case there was any doubt about Mary-Ann Stephenson being both biased (so unqualified to Chair the EHRC) and out of her depth here she hangs her hat on the hideous guidance drawn up by her predecessor - without waiting for the results of the High Court challenge which may find it unlawful.
December 19, 2025 at 9:29 AM
Reposted
Shocking: Telegraph reports that if the EHRC'S guidance is ruled unlawful the Minister might not want to lay the code based on it

Truly cutting edge journalism 🤦
"One Whitehall source told The Telegraph there is a growing belief that if the Good Law Project wins its case, Ms Phillipson will tell the EHRC to reconsider its guidance."

Well, yes, because it will be unlawful.
Phillipson blocks trans rules protecting safe spaces for women
Minister is challenging guidance that would require businesses and public bodies to offer female-only lavatories
www.telegraph.co.uk
December 18, 2025 at 10:05 PM
Reposted
This piece is billed as ‘father of girls thinks misogyny lessons are unnecessary’ but right at the end he actually asks the girls he is confidently speaking on behalf of and they…disagree. Amazing. www.thetimes.com/life-style/p...
I’m a father of teen girls. I don’t want misogyny lessons for boys
The government is planning classes to combat prejudice against women. Andrew Billen isn’t sure it will work
www.thetimes.com
December 19, 2025 at 9:40 AM
Reposted
When those who hate trans people win - or pretend to win, cf Sandie Peggie - it's all over the media, even if it's just a tribunal decision. But when they lose, even in the Court of Appeal, it's absolute bloody tumbleweed. So here's our blog about Allison Bailey latest loss. goodlaw.social/3uyd
Allison Bailey loses her case against Stonewall – again
Court of Appeal finds that Stonewall did not cause discrimination against ‘gender critical’ barrister Allison Bailey.
goodlaw.social
December 19, 2025 at 1:42 PM
Reposted
An MP who I know cares very deeply about this issue has sent a rather hurt message saying MPs had very little notice of the VAWG announcement and it was made on a day most had (with good reason) opted to use meeting their many other commitments as MPs. It's a good challenge so I share it.
The tragic reality about violence against women and girls: unless it's an issue which can be weaponised to bash trans people or migrants no one gives a fuck.
December 19, 2025 at 1:54 PM
Reposted
Should Boris Johnson "go home" to the United States, where he was born and a citizen, or does Reform's rule only apply to people of colour? www.theguardian.com/politics/202...
Reform candidate who told Lammy to ‘go home’ questioned other MPs’ loyalty to UK
Exclusive: Labour says Nigel Farage’s party should swiftly condemn Chris Parry after further comments emerge
www.theguardian.com
December 19, 2025 at 4:48 PM
Reposted
In which The Times, a patriarchal rag which celebrated in a leader column the ending of Roe v Wade and called Donald 'Grab them by the pussy' Trump a "feminist hero" and a "feminist champion" dresses up in feminist drag to lash out at trans people. 👇🏻
A quite demented Leader column published today by The Times.

First, this in which it says that the Supreme Court decision mandated that single sex spaces be divided on the basis of "biology" not gender.
December 20, 2025 at 9:04 AM
Reposted
Context here: Labour spent five years jumping through every hoop the Times held out for them, even as it was raised higher and higher until the entire process became utterly humiliating and a bit of an affront to democracy itself. And then, the paper declined to endorse a party at the election.
A quite demented Leader column published today by The Times.

First, this in which it says that the Supreme Court decision mandated that single sex spaces be divided on the basis of "biology" not gender.
December 20, 2025 at 10:15 AM
Reposted
"Protect women" if and only if accords with both Murdoch's business and political interests.
On David Walliams: The Daily Mail reveals that “showbusiness reporters at The Sun were told to drop negative stories about Walliams because both that newspaper and HarperCollins are owned by Rupert Murdoch's NewsUK, even sharing offices near London Bridge.”

archive.ph/2025.12.20-0...
December 20, 2025 at 1:48 PM
Reposted
Wes Streeting has ethical standards but they go to a different school.
December 20, 2025 at 1:50 PM
Reposted
Let's be honest, many or even most British GCs, including those the Charity Commission decided you and I should fund with our taxes, would privately endorse this position. 👇🏻
At the HHS announcement yesterday announcing proposed rules to ban GAC, they said trans people are "at the root of the evils we face" and are "a hatred for nature as God designed it and for life as it was meant to be lived.”

Just in case you thought it was about concerns for proper healthcare.
December 20, 2025 at 1:55 PM
Reposted
What's really going on here is that after the For Some Women Scotland decision The Times lied and lied and lied and lied and lied again to its readers about what the decision meant and the Supreme Court decided. It's now getting found out for its lies and instead of changing course it is digging in.
December 20, 2025 at 7:31 AM
Reposted
And she takes cognisance of the fact that even The Times leader recognises (see below) we may well win our case. And she recognises that the EHRC changed its guidance multiple times. And she recognises what Lord Hodge said in The Times and she decides to wait for the High Court decision.
December 20, 2025 at 7:23 AM