Paul Tree
@paultree10.bsky.social
550 followers 330 following 4.7K posts
it’s still a pun on "paltry” do you get it
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
paultree10.bsky.social
Just keeping him warm
paultree10.bsky.social
I always believed in the defense of Josh Naylor
paultree10.bsky.social
Embarrassing showing by Ferguson there. What the fuck was that
paultree10.bsky.social
If it ends up happening the thing about mariners fans is we will genuinely think it’s funny
kenjennings.bsky.social
Normally people don’t stress much about the odds of giving up six runs in a single inning, but I’m a Mariners fan and that’s its own kind of generational trauma.
Reposted by Paul Tree
yayroger.bsky.social
He is now wearing a Dump Here 62 shirt.
Reposted by Paul Tree
yayroger.bsky.social
A gentleman with a "Dump Here 61" shirt caught the Raleigh home run (on a bounce.)
paultree10.bsky.social
Caught by a guy in the outfield wearing a mariners “dump here 61” shirt lmao
Reposted by Paul Tree
kenjennings.bsky.social
Hooting and hollering until I’m asked to leave the airport lounge.
paultree10.bsky.social
She got mad when Adam Schiff totally correctly called her attack lines “canned”
paultree10.bsky.social
Hell even what we would consider absolute monarchs rarely had the power to just totally unilaterally tax and spend, there was almost always *some* legal checks
rincewind.run
I am not a constitutional scholar but I am pretty sure “the president my personally levy taxes and choose what they fund” is not in fact what the founders intended
peark.es
Well that's not how appropriations work at all

*WHITE HOUSE TO TRANSFER TARIFF REVENUE TO FUND WIC: LEAVITT
paultree10.bsky.social
Not that changing this would necessarily alter immigration politics much if at all, but I suspect that even voters considerably more knowledgeable than the median voter would be shocked at how few immigration restrictions the U.S. has had historically.

Essentially zero for the first century.
dabenner.bsky.social
The census covers "all persons" anyway, regardless of immigration status.
noupside.bsky.social
“Who was president in 2020?” is the question of our time
Reposted by Paul Tree
mattyglesias.bsky.social
I think aligning CBS News' editorial line with what Trump wants was part of a quid pro quo for FCC approval of the Paramount/Skydance merger — there's no "mistake"!
gregsargent.bsky.social
Do CBS News executives understand that MAGA will not be in power forever? I genuinely think this is lost on a lot of people. They've gotten scammed by bad actors into believing Trump's 2024 win represented something seismic and even permanent. I predict they'll look back on this as a serious error.
maxtani.bsky.social
CBS News current president Tom Cibroski praised Weiss on the call, saying "Bari's energy and passion is infectious and you will feel it, big time." He also added that the Free Press and CBS News "are going to learn a lot from each other...that's what this is all about."
paultree10.bsky.social
This is going to sound like insane hyperbole but I think it’s just literally true: Musk buying twitter was the worst thing to happen to the United States since 9/11
ryanlcooper.com
more and more I am convinced a good share of why Trump 2 is so much worse than before is because of what Elon did to Twitter. it's like those group chats where people gassed themselves up to join ISIS, scaled up a millionfold
paultree10.bsky.social
I for one applaud her bravery
paultree10.bsky.social
For the media, if something is done openly it’s a strategy or a policy, not a scandal.
normative.bsky.social
There is a weird sense in which I think Trump has benefitted from being so open about his corruption and totalitarian aspirations. People think scandalous stuff has to be dragged out into the daylight. If he's doing it openly, can it really be that bad? (Yes, as it turns out.)
whstancil.bsky.social
The thing about Iran-Contra and Watergate was that they WEREN’T flagrant: they had to be exposed.Trump literally does stuff five times worse than Watergate every day, and then tweets an openly neo-Nazi meme about it from the official White House account. It’s a difference in kind, not just degree.
paultree10.bsky.social
Also while ill admit there’s aren’t hard and fast definitions, the Ukraine war isn’t really what most people would consider to be a “proxy war” in the first place
paultree10.bsky.social
It takes a UK based publication to give us a good “questions swirl” I see
paultree10.bsky.social
How dare someone ban, uh, someone else for doing, presumably, something?
paultree10.bsky.social
I just thought of a compromise
washingtonpost.com
The U.S. Treasury shared a proposal to mint $1 Trump coins to mark America’s 250th anniversary.

But U.S. code says only deceased individuals may appear on U.S. currency, a tradition dating back to efforts to break from monarchical rule. https://wapo.st/4pWsyL3
Reposted by Paul Tree
adamserwer.bsky.social
John Roberts’ Constitution: The federal government protecting people’s right to vote or giving them health care violates the sacred principle of state sovereignty but if the deranged POTUS and his bloodthirsty advisers want to use the military to invade other states for being too liberal that’s fine
paultree10.bsky.social
What a bizarre circlejerk going on there
paultree10.bsky.social
One Battle After Another (2025)
alexbaumhardt.bsky.social
She’s still out here ✌️
paultree10.bsky.social
Not the Declaration of Independence but this part of Article III is starting to become awfully relevant