Dmitri Petrov
@petrovadmitri.bsky.social
5.3K followers 350 following 180 posts
Evolutionary Biologist at Stanford. Rapid Evolution, Adaptation, and Genomics. Open Science advocate.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
petrovadmitri.bsky.social
What’s the expected GC equilibrium from mutation alone?
Reposted by Dmitri Petrov
gallseeker.bsky.social
It's official! We are moving to Stowers!
Very exciting opportunity to expand our studies of insect-plant interactions. We have many opportunities available in biochemistry, development, behavior, genetics, evolution, genomics, AI, and even pest control. Interested in any of these things? Reach out!
stowersinstitute.bsky.social
NEWS🎉 We’re excited to announce @hhmijanelia.bsky.social Investigator David Stern will join the Institute from Janelia Research Campus. His lab studies how aphids transform plants at the genetic level, uncovering secrets of #evolution & new strategies for pest control. @hhmi.org bit.ly/4np96Fb
Stowers Institute recruits renowned developmental and evolutionary…
David Stern, Ph.D., brings groundbreaking research on insect–plant interactions for next-generation pest control to the Institute.
bit.ly
Reposted by Dmitri Petrov
gbazykin.bsky.social
Now hiring a computational postdoc (evolutionary genomics, molecular evolution) in my lab at Emory University.
If you’re interested in population genetics, fitness landscapes, and viral evolution — get in touch.
faculty-emory.icims.com/jobs/151181/...
Careers | Emory University | Atlanta GA
faculty-emory.icims.com
petrovadmitri.bsky.social
What we show here is that beneficial dominance reversal does operate for alleles of large effect in real natural systems under fluctuating selection and we argue that it should be common for many such systems. Hope this helps. n/n
petrovadmitri.bsky.social
This helps bc it protect the polymorphism if one of the selective epochs lasts an unusually long period of time driving the deleterious allele to loss. So this mechanism allows for maintenance of diversity without requiring fine-tuning of the length and magnitude of the selective epochs 4/n
petrovadmitri.bsky.social
The key insight by theorists - see e.g. PMID: 29087300 and PMID: 30695026 and PMID: 38471544 and refs within - is that in fluct environments, dominance reversal like this should stabilize polymorphism, bc whichever allele is deleterious, it's always recessive and lost slowly from the population 3/n
Shibboleth Authentication Request
pubmed-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.stanford.idm.oclc.org
petrovadmitri.bsky.social
Second, here, unlike the case of classic heterozygote advantage, one of the alleles is always unconditionally deleterious and the fitness of the heterozygote is in-between the two homozygotes. However, at each environmental state its fitness is closer to the fitter homozygote. 2/n
petrovadmitri.bsky.social
I think its is quite different. First we always look at fitness, not any specific trait. Fitness is indeed multidimensional in the trait space and the dominance reversal can be generated through shifts in which traits matter in different epochs. But this is not required 1/n
petrovadmitri.bsky.social
Very excited to see this work in press! I think there is a reason to believe that this is a common means of stabilizing large-effect polymorphisms in general and might be an important reason for why diploidy is so common. news.stanford.edu/stories/2025...
petrovadmitri.bsky.social
One of the things I am most proud of in my career is helping to start PEQG and then run the first three PEQGs. So stoked it’s going strong.
Reposted by Dmitri Petrov
jrossibarra.bsky.social
Save the date! #PEQG26 June 9-12 2026 in Asilomar, CA. Happens only every 2yrs, but is my favorite conference. Full website coming soon, and registration and abstract submission opens November 14, but I'm allowed to tease that keynotes will be @jnovembre.bsky.social @jennytung.bsky.social and me!
Homepage - Population, Evolutionary, and Quantitative Genetics Conference
Visit our website to learn more.
genetics-gsa.org
petrovadmitri.bsky.social
Agreed. Maybe also some Reddit style upvoting? And one needs to register with a real name to do any voting or commenting.
petrovadmitri.bsky.social
What do you all think of an idea to create a paper viewer that allows people to annotate published papers publicly and add suggested missing citations. Do you think it would improve scholarship or create a horrible mess? Or both?
Reposted by Dmitri Petrov
molbioevol.bsky.social
@jcbnunez.bsky.social et al. present an expanded release of the community-generated resource Drosophila Evolution over Space and Time (DEST 2.0), and showcase it by studying the species' demographic history and signatures of adaptation.

🔗 doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msaf132

#evobio #molbio #drosophila
MBE - Footprints of Worldwide Adaptation in Structured Populations of Drosophila melanogaster Through the Expanded DEST 2.0 Genomic Resource
Reposted by Dmitri Petrov
Reposted by Dmitri Petrov
ebi.embl.org
Welcome @timcoorens.bsky.social ‪ ‬🇳🇱, our new Research Group Leader.

Find out how Tim’s group is exploring using large-scale single-cell and spatial data to trace cell lineages, understand cancer origins, and uncover how mutations drive disease.

www.ebi.ac.uk/about/news/p...
🖥️🧬
Welcome: Tim Coorens
EMBL-EBI’s newest Research Group Leader is investigating how somatic mutations reveal the hidden histories of human cells.
www.ebi.ac.uk
petrovadmitri.bsky.social
You had me at the “asymptotic test is cool”😎
Reposted by Dmitri Petrov
carlzimmer.com
Interesting thread on a scientist using AI/feeling used by AI.
wcratcliff.bsky.social
Not sure how many scientists here have tried Claude Code or similar command line coding assistants. I had a complicated family property tax problem that was best solved by a brute force Monte Carlo simulation approach, so I spent a few days coding up and analyzing a model with Claude Code.
Reposted by Dmitri Petrov
nicrawlencenz.bsky.social
A PR company working for Colossal Biosciences is sending AI generated pieces to respected science journalists & asking them to publish the articles under their own names. This is so dodgy & just goes to show our critical expert scientific commentary is working. Sci comm failure 101 for Colossal.
lauriewinkless.bsky.social
Just got a 🧪pitch from a PR claiming to work with Colossal (de-extinction chancers). It was a pre-written article claiming the science sector is carrying out "coordinated attacks" on the co. Spy the headline. They asked if I'd publish it on my Forbes column.

Not enough eye rolls on Earth for this 🙄
Is Colossal a threat to Science or Is it Science's Last Hope for the Next Generation?