James Winters
@replicatedtypo.bsky.social
1.3K followers 670 following 65 posts
Simulating sci-fi novels and calling it cultural evolution Centre for Culture and Evolution | Brunel University London | https://j-winters.github.io
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
Reposted by James Winters
irisvanrooij.bsky.social
🌟 New preprint 🌟, by @olivia.science and me:

📝 Guest, O., & van Rooij, I. (2025). *Critical Artificial Intelligence Literacy for Psychologists*. doi.org/10.31234/osf...

🧪
Table 1

Core reasoning issues (first column), which we name after the relevant numbered section, are characterised using a plausible quote. In the second column are responses per row; also see the named section for further reading, context, and explanations.

See paper for full details: ** Guest, O., & van Rooij, I. (2025, October 4). Critical Artificial Intelligence Literacy for Psychologists. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/dkrgj_v1
Reposted by James Winters
richarddmorey.bsky.social
For me this is a hard red line in psychological science. If you advocate the use of "silicon samples" you do not understand what it is we're supposed to be doing (and likely don't understand LLMs, or are a grifter). Luckily I haven't seen much of this among people I'd consider my peer group.
Except from Table 1 of Guest & van Rooij, 2025:

3) Displacement of Participants

“I can use AI instead of participants to perform tasks and generate data.”

The providence of the data used in these models indicates it is not ethically sourced, falling below standards for our discipline, involving sweatshop labour and no consent for private data used in experiments. The output can contain direct original input data (i.e. double dipping), but smoothed to remove outliers, conform to our pre-existing ideas of what it should look like (data fabrication), and all-round irreplicable. Psychology is meant to study humans, not patterns at the output of biased statistical models.
Reposted by James Winters
frabraendle.bsky.social
What influences whether people have fun with a task?

Our paper “Leveling up fun: learning progress, expectations and success influence enjoyment in video games” with @thecharleywu.bsky.social and @ericschulz.bsky.social now in Scientific Reports!

rdcu.be/eI069

Paper summary below 1/4
Leveling up fun: learning progress, expectations, and success influence enjoyment in video games
Scientific Reports - Leveling up fun: learning progress, expectations, and success influence enjoyment in video games
rdcu.be
Reposted by James Winters
apvelilla.bsky.social
My first PhD project is out there. Thank you to my advisor @psmaldino.bsky.social and to mentor, co-author and friend @babeheim.bsky.social for encouraging and helping build this exciting and insightful collaboration. Onwards!
psmaldino.bsky.social
The Development of Risk Attitudes and their Cultural Transmission

New preprint w/ Alejandro Pérez Velilla & @babeheim.bsky.social. This is one of the best modeling papers I have ever been involved in, tackling developmental, cultural, and class differences in risk attitudes.
osf.io/preprints/so...
The Development of Risk Attitudes and their Cultural
Transmission. We use cultural evolutionary models to examine how individual experiences and culturally-inherited information jointly shape risk attitudes under environmental uncertainty. We find
that learning processes not only generate plausible variation in risk attitudes, but also that conservative learning strategies—emphasizing the preservation of generational knowledge—excel in high-risk environments, promoting stable wealth accumulation and long-term survival but limiting asset growth as conditions improve. In contrast, exploratory learning strategies—leveraging risk-free juvenile exploration and peer influence—foster risk-tolerant attitudes that thrive in affluent, low-risk settings where wealth buffers and social safety nets reduce the costs of miscalculations. Introducing economic stratification to the model reveals how wealth disparities and
inter-class interactions reinforce these patterns, exacerbating differences in learning strategies and risk-taking behaviors, and perpetuating socioeconomic inequalities through the cultural inertia of excessive risk aversion. By uniting developmental, social, and evolutionary perspectives,
our framework provides a novel lens on the cultural evolution of risk attitudes and their broader
societal implications.
Reposted by James Winters
acerbialberto.com
New preprint!

"Weapon and Poison: Framing Disinformation in European Commission Speeches, 2016–2024"

osf.io/preprints/so...
OSF
osf.io
Reposted by James Winters
spacecowboy17.bsky.social
Welcome to the ✨For You✨ feed!

It finds people who liked the same posts as you, and shows you what else they've liked recently.

📌 Pin to add it to your top bar
❤️ Like the feed and repost to spread the goodness
replicatedtypo.bsky.social
And most of the time the rest of us wish you said nothing at all.
Reposted by James Winters
zhgarfield.com
#HBES2026 abstract submissions are live! More exciting details to come soon.

Arrive early for @ces2026.bsky.social

@humbehevosoc.bsky.social
hbes2026.bsky.social
We’re delighted to share that the 37th annual Human Behavior and Evolution Society conference (HBES2026) website is now live!

#HBES2026
Reposted by James Winters
babeheim.bsky.social
How to quantify the impact of AI on long-run cultural evolution? Published today, I give it a go!

400+ years of strategic dynamics in the game of Go (Baduk/Weiqi), from feudalism to AlphaGo!
Miyagawa Shuntei's 1898 painting, "Playing Go (Japanese Chess)"
Reposted by James Winters
fusaroli.bsky.social
Why does Western Paleolithic cave art strongly prefer animal side views and often use abbreviations? Our new paper in Topics in Cognitive Science challenges long-held assumptions about these artistic choices using cognitive science experiments. A thread 1/n
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/...
Reposted by James Winters
alexmesoudi.com
Abstract submission now open for the next Cultural Evolution Society conference in Rabat, Morocco next May @culturalevolsoc.bsky.social @ces2026.bsky.social
culturalevolsoc.bsky.social
We are delighted to announce that the CES2026 conference website is now live! We invite you to submit your presentation proposals using the link on the webpage, deadline November 16th:
airess.fgses-um6p.ma/ces2026
Cultural Evolution Society 2026 Conference | Université Mohammed VI Polytechnique - FGSES
airess.fgses-um6p.ma
Reposted by James Winters
rebeccasear.bsky.social
“individuals tend to report more accurately about the partners with whom they shared knowledge than about those from whom they received knowledge….findings provide important empirical evidence on how community-wide cultural transmission is structured by demography and perception”
Transmission networks of long-term and short-term knowledge in a foraging society
Abstract. Cultural transmission across generations is key to cumulative cultural evolution. While several mechanisms—such as vertical, horizontal, and obli
academic.oup.com
Reposted by James Winters
culturalevolsoc.bsky.social
The count down starts for #CESRabat! Follow @ces2026.bsky.social and join us May 11-13 next year for an exciting meeting in Rabat, Morocco.

Massive thanks to the #CESRabat organising committee:
Sarah Alami (co-chair)
Mathieu Charbonneau (co-chair)
Zachary Garfield
Edmond Seabright
Reposted by James Winters
jbcamps.bsky.social
We're officially launching the new PSL CultureLab in 10 days !
If you're interested in the research of a collective bridging Computational Humanities, Social Sciences and Cultural Evolution, you can check our programme (and come to our event, if you're in Paris 22 September):
psl.eu/agenda/collo...
Colloque inaugural du Grand programme de recherche CultureLab | PSL
Recherche, CultureLab inaugure ses travaux le 22 septembre 2025 au Campus Condorcet avec une journée consacrée aux sciences humaines et sociales computationnelles et à l’évolution culturelle. , Le Gra...
psl.eu
Reposted by James Winters
olivia.science
Finally! 🤩 Our position piece: Against the Uncritical Adoption of 'AI' Technologies in Academia:
doi.org/10.5281/zeno...

We unpick the tech industry’s marketing, hype, & harm; and we argue for safeguarding higher education, critical
thinking, expertise, academic freedom, & scientific integrity.
1/n
Abstract: Under the banner of progress, products have been uncritically adopted or
even imposed on users — in past centuries with tobacco and combustion engines, and in
the 21st with social media. For these collective blunders, we now regret our involvement or
apathy as scientists, and society struggles to put the genie back in the bottle. Currently, we
are similarly entangled with artificial intelligence (AI) technology. For example, software updates are rolled out seamlessly and non-consensually, Microsoft Office is bundled with chatbots, and we, our students, and our employers have had no say, as it is not
considered a valid position to reject AI technologies in our teaching and research. This
is why in June 2025, we co-authored an Open Letter calling on our employers to reverse
and rethink their stance on uncritically adopting AI technologies. In this position piece,
we expound on why universities must take their role seriously toa) counter the technology
industry’s marketing, hype, and harm; and to b) safeguard higher education, critical
thinking, expertise, academic freedom, and scientific integrity. We include pointers to
relevant work to further inform our colleagues. Figure 1. A cartoon set theoretic view on various terms (see Table 1) used when discussing the superset AI
(black outline, hatched background): LLMs are in orange; ANNs are in magenta; generative models are
in blue; and finally, chatbots are in green. Where these intersect, the colours reflect that, e.g. generative adversarial network (GAN) and Boltzmann machine (BM) models are in the purple subset because they are
both generative and ANNs. In the case of proprietary closed source models, e.g. OpenAI’s ChatGPT and
Apple’s Siri, we cannot verify their implementation and so academics can only make educated guesses (cf.
Dingemanse 2025). Undefined terms used above: BERT (Devlin et al. 2019); AlexNet (Krizhevsky et al.
2017); A.L.I.C.E. (Wallace 2009); ELIZA (Weizenbaum 1966); Jabberwacky (Twist 2003); linear discriminant analysis (LDA); quadratic discriminant analysis (QDA). Table 1. Below some of the typical terminological disarray is untangled. Importantly, none of these terms
are orthogonal nor do they exclusively pick out the types of products we may wish to critique or proscribe. Protecting the Ecosystem of Human Knowledge: Five Principles
Reposted by James Winters
joshcjackson.bsky.social
@helenamiton.bsky.social and I have a new paper out:

www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...

Past theories focus on how we evolve complex technologies (jet engines), but neglect cultural innovations that help us operate these technologies (pilot checklist)

Paper has tons of examples and new theory!
Reposted by James Winters
duhe.bsky.social
New paper alert:
Finkel & Lamm, Cultural evolution beyond the individual: what human collective knowledge adds to high fidelity copying.

This is the third in the Distributed Adaptation series.

Many thanks to the diligent reviewers! #philbio #cultevo

link.springer.com/article/10.1...
Our analysis points to several conclusions. First, the phenomena highlighted by the notion of DA are contexts of selection, and may favor traits beyond high-fidelity copying. Second, high-fidelity copying is neither necessary nor sufficient for explaining these cultural phenomena. Studying these DA phenomena draws attention to the likely importance of cognitive abilities beyond copying (i.e.– imitation or emulation), that support knowledge aggregation processes. They also highlight the importance of population structure, distribution of a population in the environment, and population density, that are also emphasized by other proposals discussed above. Third, because DAs rely on a variety of population level processes there does not seem to be a general mechanism ensuring a ratchet effect on DAs, unlike the role attributed to high fidelity copying in CCE. Fourth, some games through which children acquire skills are contexts of information acquisition or learning that occurs not only through imitation.
Reposted by James Winters
abbeyepage.bsky.social
This is my point (and Duncan’s) that this special issue is co-edited by @rebeccasear.bsky.social @drsarahmyers.bsky.social and me and an @ehbea.bsky.social initiative to support rigour in science

We’re all evolutionary *to our core* and care deeply about using this knowledge to challenge hate
dstibbardhawkes.bsky.social
Or this recent article explicitly on the topic of countering racist pseudoscience.... bsky.app/profile/kevi...
kevinlala.bsky.social
Our article "Impediments to countering racist pseudoscience" (with @gillianrbrown1.bsky.social, @kztwyman.bsky.social & Marc Feldman) is now published online.

We describe five factors that contribute to the spread of racism and suggest strategies for countering them.

doi.org/10.1017/ehs....
Reposted by James Winters
abbeyepage.bsky.social
This is a great thing to do - I did it, loved it and it underpinned a Phil Trans B special issue 💜

If you want any advice DM me

Also my (with @drsarahmyers.bsky.social and @ehemmott.bsky.social successful application is on the EHBEA website to help guide you…. Just saying there’s still time 🕰️
ehbea.bsky.social
🚨 GRANT APPLICATION 🚨

Do not forget to apply for the workshop/event grant from EHBEA in case you are organising a scientific event 😉

DEADLINE: September 11th, 2025
ehbea.bsky.social
🚨GRANT APPLICATION🚨

Call for the WORKSHOP/EVENT GRANT from EHBEA is officially open!

If you are interested in organising a scientific workshop or an outreach event please check the link and apply!

DEADLINE: September 11th, 2025

www.cambridge.org/core/members...
replicatedtypo.bsky.social
Great news! Really missed this feature on Bluesky. But, rather than copying twitter, would it be too much to ask for bookmarks to be searchable 🤔
laurenshof.online
private bookmarks are coming 👀
github post: This adds endpoints to implement bookmarks.

ATproto currently only supports public data. On the other hand, we've designed bookmarks as a private feature, in which only the user can see their own bookmarks. We might expand the feature to allow for making some bookmarks public (e.g., create collections and define visibility), but that's outside the initial scope.

We have the intention to extend the protocol to add support for private data, but it is a complex topic, and we haven't yet built support for it.

So for this feature, we rely on private storage. We have modeled our private storage on lexicon definitions to facilitate a future migration to on-protocol, once we have that capability.