Sarah Schoppe-Sullivan
@sjss.bsky.social
1K followers 1.8K following 13 posts
Professor, Ohio State University, researches coparenting, father-child relations, parental gatekeeping. Content and activity reflect my own views as a private citizen and not those of my employer.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by Sarah Schoppe-Sullivan
cheryllynneaton.bsky.social
Creatives aren't anti-technology. They are anti-THEFT! Especially when the people stealing from them have millions and they don't even know how they are going to make rent if they can't get another gig.
Reposted by Sarah Schoppe-Sullivan
jayvanbavel.bsky.social
In a new paper, we find that sycophantic #AI chatbots make people more extreme--operating like an echo chamber

Yet, people prefer sycophantic chatbots and see them as less biased

Only open-minded people prefer disagreeable chatbots: osf.io/preprints/ps...

Led by @steverathje.bsky.social
Reposted by Sarah Schoppe-Sullivan
lewan.bsky.social
Terrific sleuthing and deep background research by @alex23.bsky.social into the horrors of "research" on autism conducted by none other than the person RFK Jr put in charge of ... you guessed it, the (non-existent) link between autism and vaccines:
From Willowbrook to the Geiers: Families Speak Out
“Once, I went down to the Geiers’ basement to use the bathroom. I saw several ladies packaging drug bottles into boxes. And in the bathroom I saw what appeared to be equipment from a chemistry lab.”
www.etpnews.com
Reposted by Sarah Schoppe-Sullivan
rachelkleinfeld.bsky.social
People like me, who have spent a lifetime building credibility, face a real problem when most Americans no longer trust institutions. We need to face the new terms of trust for our expertise to matter. Renée DiResta@noUpside & I wrote this to explain why & how: carnegieendowment.org/research/202...
For Expertise to Matter, Nonpartisan Institutions Need New Communications Strategies
To avoid irrelevance when they are needed most, experts and nonpartisan analysts must rethink not just their channels of communication but also their theory of influence.
carnegieendowment.org
Reposted by Sarah Schoppe-Sullivan
nschwarz.bsky.social
#psychscisky
brendannyhan.bsky.social
Depolarization is not "a scalable solution for reducing societal-level conflict.... achieving lasting depolarization will likely require....moving beyond individual-level treatments to address the elite behaviors and structural incentives that fuel partisan conflict" www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/...
Reposted by Sarah Schoppe-Sullivan
vonaether.bsky.social
People are making Rapture jokes like there's no tomorrow
Reposted by Sarah Schoppe-Sullivan
Reposted by Sarah Schoppe-Sullivan
dingdingpeng.the100.ci
New paper out with @boryslaw.bsky.social 🥳 In which we sketch out how to rethink measurement invariance causally for applied researchers. And provide a causal definition of measurement invariance!

www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...
Rethinking measurement invariance causally

Highlights:
It is preferable to work with a causal definition of measurement invariance
A violation of measurement invariance is a potentially substantively interesting observation
Standard tests for measurement invariance rely on strong assumptions
Group differences can be thought of as descriptive results Conceptual graph illustration the central points of the manuscript. A group variable is potentiall connected to a construct of interest which affects items. Measurement invariance is violated if the group variable directly affects the items, for example by modifying the loadings from the construct to the items, or by directly affecting an item To make this less abstract, consider a scenario where students take an exam, R, meant to capture some ability, T, and then are admitted to a program, V, depending on their exam results: R → V. This is sufficient to result in a violation of the statistical definition of measurement invariance. Exam results and admission are not independent given ability because exam results have a direct effect on admission. Even if we know somebody’s ability (e.g., we know it’s very high), learning about their admission status (e.g., they were not admitted) can tell us something about their exam result (e.g., it may have been worse than expected). According to the causal definition, this in itself does not constitute measurement bias, which seems a sensible conclusion here. After all, the scenario does not involve any reason to believe that the measurement process varied systematically by admission status. Admission happens after the exams took place, it cannot retroactively influence the measurement process (and, for example, lead to unfair treatment depending on admission status).
Reposted by Sarah Schoppe-Sullivan
socialmedialab.ca
This is clearly an attack on academic freedom. One of the consequences of this unfortunate episode is that the Texas Board of Regents has decided to launch a comprehensive audit of all courses across the A&M System. This matter is far from over. x.com/tamusystem/s...
Texas A&M System on X: "A statement from The Texas A&M University System Board of Regents: https://t.co/aYHoNDCi0L" / X
A statement from The Texas A&M University System Board of Regents: https://t.co/aYHoNDCi0L
x.com
Reposted by Sarah Schoppe-Sullivan
drew-lewis.com
"This isn't about academic freedom"
Reposted by Sarah Schoppe-Sullivan
joeura.bsky.social
Here's the catalog description the now-fired Texas A&M lecturer allegedly transgressed by giving a lecture about gender in children's literature.

ENGL 360 Literature for Children

Credits 3. 3 Lecture hours. Representative writers, genres, texts and movements.

president.tamu.edu/messages/an-...
Reposted by Sarah Schoppe-Sullivan
pengzell.bsky.social
All of this is true. I would add sometimes your paper is stuck because the editor is just a person and it is ok to ask
benpatrickwill.bsky.social
Academic authors, here's a peek into the black box of journal publishing from an journal editor if you can bear it:
Reposted by Sarah Schoppe-Sullivan
cryptogenomicon.bsky.social
NIH: After review, we note that you have a large unspent balance on your grant. Please explain immediately.

me: well, uh, yeah, one reason we're not spending on that grant is because NIH terminated it in May along with all the rest of federal funding to Harvard, maybe you don't remember
Reposted by Sarah Schoppe-Sullivan
karenguzzo.bsky.social
Feeling alarmed over dire long-term population projections that suggest humanity will disappear? Don't be!

Demographers generally aren't worried, and you shouldn't be either. @amandajean.bsky.social explains why in this great @ccfamilies.bsky.social brief.

sites.utexas.edu/contemporary...
Don’t Panic: Population Projection is Not a Crystal Ball

August 20th, 2025

Population panic – worries about “depopulation” linked to low birth rates – has become pervasive, with dire predictions in both the short and long term. Yet demographers like us – experts who explicitly study population size, composition, and structure – are generally not highly concerned. Why is this? It’s because we understand the strengths and limitations of population projections. Projections can accurately describe how populations will change if we know future birth, death, and migration rates. But demographers are well aware that they don’t have a crystal ball – we can’t fully anticipate economic shifts, political changes, global events, or how future generations will respond to their changing worlds. That’s why the farther we project from the present, the less accurate those projections are likely to be.
Reposted by Sarah Schoppe-Sullivan
lawprofblawg.bsky.social
The Surrendering to Trump University Law Journal seeks meritorious, not woke articles. White males preferred from higher-ranked universities. Preference will be given for brilliant articles that advocate depriving someone of happiness or rights regardless of factual or legal obstacles.

#Satire
Reposted by Sarah Schoppe-Sullivan
jacasiegel.bsky.social
Oh, SPSS, they could never make me hate you ❤️
Reposted by Sarah Schoppe-Sullivan
jinxungoh.bsky.social
Also, why am I seeing important papers about academia on LinkedIn and not here!? we gotta step up our game here.
Reposted by Sarah Schoppe-Sullivan
mattsouthward.bsky.social
Potential grad applicants: I'm hoping to take 1-2 new students this cycle!

There's no need to email me in advance unless you have specific questions that aren't answered on the lab or psych department's website - everyone's applications will be considered equally.

u.osu.edu/mattlab/2025...
Accepting 1-2 new students this cycle! ☝️/✌️
https://u.osu.edu/mattlab/2025/08/06/accepting-1-2-new-students-this-cycle-☝%EF%B8%8F-✌%EF%B8%8F/
Reposted by Sarah Schoppe-Sullivan
rmayemsinger.bsky.social
In a world of Columbia Universities and CBS/Paramounts, be a Southpark.
Reposted by Sarah Schoppe-Sullivan
jmfncfr.bsky.social
Check out another highly cited article from JMF's 2020 Decade in Review issue, on the evolution of fathering research: tinyurl.com/2ce4p986 authored by @sjss.bsky.social & Jay Fagan

#ThrowbackThursday #FamilyScience #SocialScience #SocialScienceResearch #FatherhoodResearch