White House names journalists, outcry
3m
The White House published a "Gallery of Shame" webpage naming journalists and outlets it deemed hostile, and drew criticism that the move targeted press freedom.
Reposted by Kim L. Scheppele
The White House just launched a "Media Bias" tracker to supposedly monitor fake news. It's really a hit list of reporters & outlets covering issues in ways Trump & the admin dislike. Flagrant attack on independent thought, freedom of the press & free speech. www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025...
White House launches website to excoriate media for ‘biased’ stories
Trump administration lists reporting it objects to in latest escalation of attacks on US journalism
www.theguardian.com
November 30, 2025 at 7:20 PM
The White House just launched a "Media Bias" tracker to supposedly monitor fake news. It's really a hit list of reporters & outlets covering issues in ways Trump & the admin dislike. Flagrant attack on independent thought, freedom of the press & free speech. www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025...
Het is bijna als in een karikatuur van een autocratie - alleen dat dit niet De Speld is ⬇️
- Het Witte Huis lanceert op WH.gov/MediaBias een pagina die media en journalisten aanwijst als „verkeerd” of „partijdig”, met ranglijsten en een „Hall of Shame”.
November 30, 2025 at 10:29 AM
Het is bijna als in een karikatuur van een autocratie - alleen dat dit niet De Speld is ⬇️
The best thing the national political press could do is stop it with their special Trump Rules and cover him like they would have covered any other president. They should have done that 10 years ago, but it's never too late.
December 1, 2025 at 12:07 AM
The best thing the national political press could do is stop it with their special Trump Rules and cover him like they would have covered any other president. They should have done that 10 years ago, but it's never too late.
by Oliver Nachtwey Reposted by Leonhard Dobusch
Kolleg:innen aus der Kommunikationswissenschaft! Gibt es schon gute Analysen, wieviele „wokekritische“ Texte gleichen Inhalts in den letzen Jahre erschienen sind und in welchen Verhältnis sie zur (angeblichen) „woken Hegemomie“ unter den Journalisten stehen?
Es ist wirklich so doll. In den imaginiertem Traumata der Anti-Woke-Krieger rufen sie buchstäblich die immer gleichen Anekdoten auf. Und die Zeitungen drucken es immer wieder als cklickbaitender, therapeutischer Anti-Journalismus.
Und dann auch noch neues Datenmaterial: von dem Fall hatte ich vorher in den Medien noch gar nichts gehört!
November 30, 2025 at 8:03 AM
Kolleg:innen aus der Kommunikationswissenschaft! Gibt es schon gute Analysen, wieviele „wokekritische“ Texte gleichen Inhalts in den letzen Jahre erschienen sind und in welchen Verhältnis sie zur (angeblichen) „woken Hegemomie“ unter den Journalisten stehen?
Echt schokkend!
www.whitehouse.gov/mediabias/
www.whitehouse.gov/mediabias/
Media Offenders
Explore the Media Bias Tracker that fact checks and holds Fake News accountable. False claims debunked, Hall of Shame for serial offenders, Leaderboard of networks ranked by Repeated Lies. Stay inform...
www.whitehouse.gov
November 30, 2025 at 9:14 PM
Echt schokkend!
www.whitehouse.gov/mediabias/
www.whitehouse.gov/mediabias/
Reposted by Steve Peers, James Connelly
For those kind enough to be paying subscribers, I have done a treat post:
How the BBC censored the line that Trump is “the most openly corrupt president in American history”
emptycity.substack.com/p/how-the-bb...
How the BBC censored the line that Trump is “the most openly corrupt president in American history”
emptycity.substack.com/p/how-the-bb...
November 30, 2025 at 11:01 AM
For those kind enough to be paying subscribers, I have done a treat post:
How the BBC censored the line that Trump is “the most openly corrupt president in American history”
emptycity.substack.com/p/how-the-bb...
How the BBC censored the line that Trump is “the most openly corrupt president in American history”
emptycity.substack.com/p/how-the-bb...
And needless to say, obviously there have been exceptions all along with some reporters doing great work. You know what I'm talking about with the far-too-general pattern.
The best thing the national political press could do is stop it with their special Trump Rules and cover him like they would have covered any other president. They should have done that 10 years ago, but it's never too late.
December 1, 2025 at 12:09 AM
And needless to say, obviously there have been exceptions all along with some reporters doing great work. You know what I'm talking about with the far-too-general pattern.
Reposted by Damian Trilling
- Het Witte Huis lanceert op WH.gov/MediaBias een pagina die media en journalisten aanwijst als „verkeerd” of „partijdig”, met ranglijsten en een „Hall of Shame”.
November 30, 2025 at 7:29 AM
- Het Witte Huis lanceert op WH.gov/MediaBias een pagina die media en journalisten aanwijst als „verkeerd” of „partijdig”, met ranglijsten en een „Hall of Shame”.
Reposted by Kent Johnson
We’ve had people from the U.S. and abroad asking whether the information on the White House website is even accurate anymore. The site has become unreliable, filled with blatantly false and deliberately misleading content.
November 30, 2025 at 3:10 PM
We’ve had people from the U.S. and abroad asking whether the information on the White House website is even accurate anymore. The site has become unreliable, filled with blatantly false and deliberately misleading content.
By and large, MSM (@Welker et al) allows propaganda to fester without clarity of truth or investigation of facts.
The bar is low, and journalism continues to fail in the moment.
The world watches.
The bar is low, and journalism continues to fail in the moment.
The world watches.
November 30, 2025 at 3:42 PM
By and large, MSM (@Welker et al) allows propaganda to fester without clarity of truth or investigation of facts.
The bar is low, and journalism continues to fail in the moment.
The world watches.
The bar is low, and journalism continues to fail in the moment.
The world watches.
So called ‘Left’ media sources also doing a lot of misrepresentation…
November 30, 2025 at 8:53 AM
So called ‘Left’ media sources also doing a lot of misrepresentation…
"Trump isn’t lashing out because he’s strong; he’s lashing out because he’s under pressure, badly advised, and increasingly aware that the media questions he hates are questions millions of Americans are asking too."
open.substack.com/pub/heatherc...
open.substack.com/pub/heatherc...
November 28, 2025
As Trump’s popularity continues to drop, the MAGA coalition shows signs of cracking, and Trump’s mental acuity slips, there is a frantic feel to the administration, as if Trump’s people are trying to ...
open.substack.com
November 30, 2025 at 5:25 AM
"Trump isn’t lashing out because he’s strong; he’s lashing out because he’s under pressure, badly advised, and increasingly aware that the media questions he hates are questions millions of Americans are asking too."
open.substack.com/pub/heatherc...
open.substack.com/pub/heatherc...
Reposted by Rupert Read
Weak headline; weak framing. The White House has published a list of journalists that the administration doesn't like.
White House launches website to excoriate media for ‘biased’ stories
Trump administration lists reporting it objects to in latest escalation of attacks on US journalism
www.theguardian.com
November 30, 2025 at 9:23 AM
Weak headline; weak framing. The White House has published a list of journalists that the administration doesn't like.
by Bob Hudson
Remind me why the BBC has banned the Reith lecturer (and indeed all of its staff) from stating that Trump is ‘the most openly corrupt president in American history’… www.theguardian.com/us-news/ng-i...
All the president’s millions: how the Trumps are turning the presidency into riches
From Vietnam to the Balkans, Donald Trump’s family has launched a global dealmaking blitz since his re-election
www.theguardian.com
November 30, 2025 at 7:41 AM
Remind me why the BBC has banned the Reith lecturer (and indeed all of its staff) from stating that Trump is ‘the most openly corrupt president in American history’… www.theguardian.com/us-news/ng-i...
Reposted by Andy Reisinger
To be clear: the specific intention behind the state naming and singling out journalists it doesn't like is to put those journalists in danger.
November 30, 2025 at 9:29 AM
To be clear: the specific intention behind the state naming and singling out journalists it doesn't like is to put those journalists in danger.