hearing richard Dawkins was a group member was 0% surprising
February 17, 2026 at 2:35 PM
hearing richard Dawkins was a group member was 0% surprising
Dawkins cheezies should sell merch
February 17, 2026 at 1:04 PM
Dawkins cheezies should sell merch
I have started a YouTube channel, and my latest video has 10 views! It is about how Richard Dawkins Selfish Gene influenced pessimistic philosophy in the 21st century. If you are interested, then please check it out/subscribe to the channel:
youtu.be/p12eWPBxCL4?...
#philsky #philosophy #science
youtu.be/p12eWPBxCL4?...
#philsky #philosophy #science
The Selfish Gene and the crisis of meaning
YouTube video by Dr. Chris Earl (MOL-BIO)
youtu.be
February 17, 2026 at 12:01 PM
I have started a YouTube channel, and my latest video has 10 views! It is about how Richard Dawkins Selfish Gene influenced pessimistic philosophy in the 21st century. If you are interested, then please check it out/subscribe to the channel:
youtu.be/p12eWPBxCL4?...
#philsky #philosophy #science
youtu.be/p12eWPBxCL4?...
#philsky #philosophy #science
Now playing on 🎸 Joint Radio Blues Rock:
🎵 Jimmy Dawkins - Highway Man Blues
Keep the blues alive! Listen here: 🥃
https://www.jointil.com
#Blues #Rock #BluesRock #classicRock #NowPlaying #Live #OnlineRadio #Radio
🎵 Jimmy Dawkins - Highway Man Blues
Keep the blues alive! Listen here: 🥃
https://www.jointil.com
#Blues #Rock #BluesRock #classicRock #NowPlaying #Live #OnlineRadio #Radio
February 17, 2026 at 9:30 AM
Now playing on 🎸 Joint Radio Blues Rock:
🎵 Jimmy Dawkins - Highway Man Blues
Keep the blues alive! Listen here: 🥃
https://www.jointil.com
#Blues #Rock #BluesRock #classicRock #NowPlaying #Live #OnlineRadio #Radio
🎵 Jimmy Dawkins - Highway Man Blues
Keep the blues alive! Listen here: 🥃
https://www.jointil.com
#Blues #Rock #BluesRock #classicRock #NowPlaying #Live #OnlineRadio #Radio
Jag förstod din poäng, Mackan, och jag håller med dig.
Många ateister dömer troende/icke troende olika. Men, jag vill påstå att många troende, oavsett religion/övertygelse, gör likadant.
Av den anledningen ser jag ateism som en form av religion, med sina fanatiker, Dawkins t.ex.
Många ateister dömer troende/icke troende olika. Men, jag vill påstå att många troende, oavsett religion/övertygelse, gör likadant.
Av den anledningen ser jag ateism som en form av religion, med sina fanatiker, Dawkins t.ex.
February 17, 2026 at 9:17 AM
Jag förstod din poäng, Mackan, och jag håller med dig.
Många ateister dömer troende/icke troende olika. Men, jag vill påstå att många troende, oavsett religion/övertygelse, gör likadant.
Av den anledningen ser jag ateism som en form av religion, med sina fanatiker, Dawkins t.ex.
Många ateister dömer troende/icke troende olika. Men, jag vill påstå att många troende, oavsett religion/övertygelse, gör likadant.
Av den anledningen ser jag ateism som en form av religion, med sina fanatiker, Dawkins t.ex.
DID RICHARD DAWKINS DIE IN VAIN?
February 17, 2026 at 8:51 AM
DID RICHARD DAWKINS DIE IN VAIN?
It’s a theory that I kinda wish was true, but it probably isn’t. Dawkins, staying in a close orbit now, said it best, "either complete rubbish or a work of consummate genius.”
So thumbing through Epstein’s Amazon orders in the files, and I see his order for a copy of the book.
So thumbing through Epstein’s Amazon orders in the files, and I see his order for a copy of the book.
February 17, 2026 at 8:28 AM
It’s a theory that I kinda wish was true, but it probably isn’t. Dawkins, staying in a close orbit now, said it best, "either complete rubbish or a work of consummate genius.”
So thumbing through Epstein’s Amazon orders in the files, and I see his order for a copy of the book.
So thumbing through Epstein’s Amazon orders in the files, and I see his order for a copy of the book.
Jaa... 'witch hunt' (smiley, smiley)
No jopas.. (smiley, smiley)
(Huomautan kuitenkin, että ymmärtääkseen tän jutun 'jujun' täytyy kuitenkin tietää kuka Dawkins on. Useimmat ei varmaan ole niin selvillä...)
No jopas.. (smiley, smiley)
(Huomautan kuitenkin, että ymmärtääkseen tän jutun 'jujun' täytyy kuitenkin tietää kuka Dawkins on. Useimmat ei varmaan ole niin selvillä...)
February 17, 2026 at 8:22 AM
Jaa... 'witch hunt' (smiley, smiley)
No jopas.. (smiley, smiley)
(Huomautan kuitenkin, että ymmärtääkseen tän jutun 'jujun' täytyy kuitenkin tietää kuka Dawkins on. Useimmat ei varmaan ole niin selvillä...)
No jopas.. (smiley, smiley)
(Huomautan kuitenkin, että ymmärtääkseen tän jutun 'jujun' täytyy kuitenkin tietää kuka Dawkins on. Useimmat ei varmaan ole niin selvillä...)
I don't think they're stupid (tho they may hope that I am.) They're racist: by "Not Christian" they don't mean "atheist", they mean "Not white".
They almost certainly object to African Evangelicals and Romanian Orthodox. But not Richard Dawkins.
They almost certainly object to African Evangelicals and Romanian Orthodox. But not Richard Dawkins.
February 17, 2026 at 8:18 AM
I don't think they're stupid (tho they may hope that I am.) They're racist: by "Not Christian" they don't mean "atheist", they mean "Not white".
They almost certainly object to African Evangelicals and Romanian Orthodox. But not Richard Dawkins.
They almost certainly object to African Evangelicals and Romanian Orthodox. But not Richard Dawkins.
Jeśli jedna osoba ma urojenia, mówimy o chorobie psychicznej. Gdy wielu ludzi ma urojenia, nazywa się to religią.
Richard Dawkins
Bóg urojony
Richard Dawkins
Bóg urojony
February 17, 2026 at 7:27 AM
Jeśli jedna osoba ma urojenia, mówimy o chorobie psychicznej. Gdy wielu ludzi ma urojenia, nazywa się to religią.
Richard Dawkins
Bóg urojony
Richard Dawkins
Bóg urojony
Hey now, Richard Dawkins is now a "cultural Christian", whatever the fuck that means.
February 17, 2026 at 7:26 AM
Hey now, Richard Dawkins is now a "cultural Christian", whatever the fuck that means.
Dawkins muuten vähättelee omaelämäkerrassaan seksuaalista ahdistelua jota kärsi lapsena
Myös Richard Dawkins osaa valita seuransa.
“There is a rather nasty young woman who seems to be running some kind of a witch-hunt against Lawrence Krauss because of his defence of Jeffrey Epstein,” Dawkins wrote.“
web.archive.org/web/20260213...
“There is a rather nasty young woman who seems to be running some kind of a witch-hunt against Lawrence Krauss because of his defence of Jeffrey Epstein,” Dawkins wrote.“
web.archive.org/web/20260213...
February 17, 2026 at 7:13 AM
Dawkins muuten vähättelee omaelämäkerrassaan seksuaalista ahdistelua jota kärsi lapsena
Myös Richard Dawkins osaa valita seuransa.
“There is a rather nasty young woman who seems to be running some kind of a witch-hunt against Lawrence Krauss because of his defence of Jeffrey Epstein,” Dawkins wrote.“
web.archive.org/web/20260213...
“There is a rather nasty young woman who seems to be running some kind of a witch-hunt against Lawrence Krauss because of his defence of Jeffrey Epstein,” Dawkins wrote.“
web.archive.org/web/20260213...
February 17, 2026 at 7:07 AM
Myös Richard Dawkins osaa valita seuransa.
“There is a rather nasty young woman who seems to be running some kind of a witch-hunt against Lawrence Krauss because of his defence of Jeffrey Epstein,” Dawkins wrote.“
web.archive.org/web/20260213...
“There is a rather nasty young woman who seems to be running some kind of a witch-hunt against Lawrence Krauss because of his defence of Jeffrey Epstein,” Dawkins wrote.“
web.archive.org/web/20260213...
Or Richard Dawkins.
February 17, 2026 at 7:07 AM
Or Richard Dawkins.
Yeah that would be a remarkably one sided contest. Side note: one of the many benefits of being an atheist is that there is no need to worship any prominent atheist thinker and pretend they are some infallible messiah. As a result, it is easy to summarily dismiss Dawkins for this, as he should be.
February 17, 2026 at 3:06 AM
Yeah that would be a remarkably one sided contest. Side note: one of the many benefits of being an atheist is that there is no need to worship any prominent atheist thinker and pretend they are some infallible messiah. As a result, it is easy to summarily dismiss Dawkins for this, as he should be.
There's good reasons for #Bills to consider a Dion Dawkins trade.
Spent a few minutes going over them here.
youtu.be/OREBZoGAOFc
Spent a few minutes going over them here.
youtu.be/OREBZoGAOFc
Should Bills consider Dion Dawkins trade? Breaking down why it might be time and what stoppers exist
YouTube video by Thad Brown
youtu.be
February 17, 2026 at 1:55 AM
There's good reasons for #Bills to consider a Dion Dawkins trade.
Spent a few minutes going over them here.
youtu.be/OREBZoGAOFc
Spent a few minutes going over them here.
youtu.be/OREBZoGAOFc
If you haven't, I'd highly recommend it — and not just so the previous post makes sense.
(Also, while I have you — two decades later I'm still laughing at Dawkins on a tricycle).
(Also, while I have you — two decades later I'm still laughing at Dawkins on a tricycle).
February 17, 2026 at 1:14 AM
If you haven't, I'd highly recommend it — and not just so the previous post makes sense.
(Also, while I have you — two decades later I'm still laughing at Dawkins on a tricycle).
(Also, while I have you — two decades later I'm still laughing at Dawkins on a tricycle).
I'm sure that statement will get me some hate, but Stephen Hawking was in the Epstein files, that guy was FULLY paralyzed, what could he do? also Richard Dawkins a hero of mine is in there. If he's guilty though after thorough investigation, throw him in the woodchipper too.
February 17, 2026 at 1:11 AM
I'm sure that statement will get me some hate, but Stephen Hawking was in the Epstein files, that guy was FULLY paralyzed, what could he do? also Richard Dawkins a hero of mine is in there. If he's guilty though after thorough investigation, throw him in the woodchipper too.
Dan Dennett said that you should re-express your opponent’s view so fairly that they say “Thanks, I wish I’d put it that way.”
Few embody that spirit better than the former Archbishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams.
Here in conversation with Richard Dawkins.
podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/u...
Few embody that spirit better than the former Archbishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams.
Here in conversation with Richard Dawkins.
podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/u...
#1. Richard Dawkins & Rowan Williams - God vs Science. What is behind the poetry of reality?
Podcast Episode · Uncommon Ground with Justin Brierley · 02/10/2026 · 1h 49m
podcasts.apple.com
February 17, 2026 at 12:19 AM
Dan Dennett said that you should re-express your opponent’s view so fairly that they say “Thanks, I wish I’d put it that way.”
Few embody that spirit better than the former Archbishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams.
Here in conversation with Richard Dawkins.
podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/u...
Few embody that spirit better than the former Archbishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams.
Here in conversation with Richard Dawkins.
podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/u...
I've mainlined season 2 of The Artful Dodger and really enjoyed it, despite them kind of leaning heavily on the character of Belle instead of, y'know, Jack Dawkins. BUT, s1 came out in 2023 and s2 was released in Feb 26. You can't be leaving 3 damn years between seasons of a show no one knows about!
February 17, 2026 at 12:16 AM
I've mainlined season 2 of The Artful Dodger and really enjoyed it, despite them kind of leaning heavily on the character of Belle instead of, y'know, Jack Dawkins. BUT, s1 came out in 2023 and s2 was released in Feb 26. You can't be leaving 3 damn years between seasons of a show no one knows about!
I’d been feeling down on all the New Atheists, etc, what with Dawkins & Epstein.
But here come the proponents of Christianity to make them look bad too.
But here come the proponents of Christianity to make them look bad too.
Charlie Downes (Restore Britain, campaign director): "More than anything, it is Christian faith. Ancestry and it is Christian faith"
Alex Phillips: "So if you are not a Christian, you can't be British?"
CD: "Well. You are certainly less British if you are not a believer in Christian principles".
Alex Phillips: "So if you are not a Christian, you can't be British?"
CD: "Well. You are certainly less British if you are not a believer in Christian principles".
February 16, 2026 at 11:27 PM
I’d been feeling down on all the New Atheists, etc, what with Dawkins & Epstein.
But here come the proponents of Christianity to make them look bad too.
But here come the proponents of Christianity to make them look bad too.
February 16, 2026 at 9:17 PM
Um. Krauss, Dawkins, Chomsky are in the Epstein files. And not laudably; & Rebecca Watson, albeit incidentally. No doubt more; we don't know "none" of the predators were atheists. Perhaps you meant "shown to be atheists and pedophiles in the files" and not just "in the files." But still.
February 16, 2026 at 8:52 PM
Um. Krauss, Dawkins, Chomsky are in the Epstein files. And not laudably; & Rebecca Watson, albeit incidentally. No doubt more; we don't know "none" of the predators were atheists. Perhaps you meant "shown to be atheists and pedophiles in the files" and not just "in the files." But still.