Reposted by: David W. Kerstetter
Proudly serving in federal LE shouldn’t require hiding behind masks. I’ve hope that public sentiment is finally filtering through to their hiring shortfalls.
However, I’d be fine with any uni-level R1 and grant reporting to have an asterisk on that number for any Compact Campus.
Higher Ed forgets this truism at its peril.
Reposted by: David W. Kerstetter, Laia Balcells, Kevin Carey
From @kevincarey1.bsky.social: www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archiv...
Reposted by: David W. Kerstetter, Joe R. Feagin, Zhang , and 18 more David W. Kerstetter, Joe R. Feagin, Zhang, Robert W. Wallace, Laia Balcells, Dawn J. Wright, Jaakko Husa, Jussi T. Eronen, Smith, Robert C. Richards, Alan Richardson, W. Andy Knight, Gerald Friedman, Stacy D. VanDeveer, Beatriz Gallardo Paúls, Samantha Brennan, James Goodwin, Brian Keegan, Sarah Roberts, Albin Wagener, Pádua Fernandes
Best thoughts to all my fed colleagues, and please reach out if there’s anything I can do to assist.
by Steven J. Cooke — Reposted by: David W. Kerstetter
We need SCOTUS-proof — CJ Roberts-proof — federal employment agreements.
Reposted by: David W. Kerstetter
Reposted by: David W. Kerstetter, Karen Benjamin Guzzo, David R. Miller
In that situation, a yes vote conveys one thing and nothing else: validation for the White House’s blatantly unconstitutional actions.
All of this is for show to placate the base. Discovery during an actual trial is something this DOJ will avoid at all costs.
Jefferson, Hamilton, and Adams are seen as the Constitutional Architects, but it was Washington who presciently saw political parties as the largest potential issue to those infamous “checks-and-balances.”
Tenure-track or equivalent faculty positions used to be “unicorns,” yet it’s increasingly difficult in our area to recruit good candidates, in large (not solely!) because of the economics.