Scholar

John Kane

H-index: 26
Political science 48%
Physics 27%
uptonorwell.bsky.social
A short-and-sweet guide to developing research questions published in @nature.com.

Lots of good advice here 👍
uptonorwell.bsky.social
Really appreciate it, Rikio! My primary goal for that paper was for it to be as practical and useful for researchers as possible, so this is really nice to hear! 😊🙏

by John KaneReposted by: Winston T. Lin

uptonorwell.bsky.social
Are you or one of your students considering doing a Ph.D. in a social science? I've spent a lot of time talking about this w/ students & finally wrote something up.

IMO, there are only 3 good reasons to do it. One of them needs to be true--otherwise, don't.

medium.com/the-quantast...
The Only Three Reasons to Do a Ph.D. in the Social Sciences
If none are true, don’t do it.
medium.com
uptonorwell.bsky.social
Just heard about this from a friend. Wow. It’s like the Refused, Hives, Minus (circa “Jesus Christ Bobby” album), and At the Drive-In all combined together in the best possible way. Loving it.
uptonorwell.bsky.social
My goodness—hope the recovery keeps going smoothly, Raul! 🤞

by John KaneReposted by: David Darmofal

uptonorwell.bsky.social
🚨 Very flattered to have a piece, w/ the terrific
@miacosta.bsky.social, in the new @apsa.bsky.social Experiments Newsletter!

In it, we offer some thoughts on how to think about how "realistic" experimental results are. Might be useful for students 😁

connect.apsanet.org/s42/newslett...
Newsletter: Main Page
connect.apsanet.org
uptonorwell.bsky.social
Many thanks for the s/o, Arieda! I’m really glad you liked it and hope folks find it useful 😊
uptonorwell.bsky.social
Just submitted book revisions 🥳 and wanted to write something a little more "fun."

I've been wanting to write this one for a long time and just posted it on Medium (no paywall 👍). For the profs out there, it might serve as a useful class reading (?). Hope you enjoy!

medium.com/@jvk221/3-st...
3 Statistical Problems with Fate
We’ve all thought about whether particular events in our lives might have been due to Fate. Here are 3 statistical problems with doing that.
medium.com
uptonorwell.bsky.social
Agreed, yes. I think what we're showing is that info about the "inflation rate" might not be interpreted the way we assume. There's clearly a lot of public confusion about what it means.

Lots more to do on this, so thank you for the feedback! 😁
uptonorwell.bsky.social
I just checked and the partisan difference still holds. It's true that Ds tend to be more educated than Rs, but the difference isn't huge. On top of that, the % of the sample with post-grad edu (~15%) probably isn't big enough to drive that effect.

But yeah, edu is definitely a part of the puzzle.
uptonorwell.bsky.social
Good question! It's looking like those with post-graduate degrees are the only ones with a (albeit narrow) plurality answering correctly.

But even still, it's a surprisingly small % 😕
uptonorwell.bsky.social
Oh yes, that’s another huge misunderstanding indeed. I’d love to know the share of the public that makes that mistake
uptonorwell.bsky.social
p.s., this is some early data from a current project with the great @cbwlezien.bsky.social 👍

by John KaneReposted by: Scott Clifford

uptonorwell.bsky.social
Inflation was a big issue--maybe even *the* issue--in 2024.

But do citizens understand how to interpret inflation rates?

Using some new data from @verasight.bsky.social, the answer seems to be largely: no.

On top of that, Republicans show significantly less understanding than Democrats.
uptonorwell.bsky.social
Truly wild to see that this just hit 300 citations on GS 🤯

It's a good lesson for PhD students--this started as a short homework assignment for a class on causal inference. At first I just wanted to know if MC placement matters. But over time, it turned into much more & led to several more papers.
uptonorwell.bsky.social
Much appreciated, David! And thank you again for generously giving me feedback on an early draft of it! 🙏
uptonorwell.bsky.social
Thanks so much, Hans!

Yep, empirically, a candidate whose party has already served two terms may have a slight disadvantage—but it doesn’t seem to be inherent.

That disadvantage, though, pales in comparison to the advantage held by 1-term incumbents (historically speaking) 👍
uptonorwell.bsky.social
My article on incumbency advantage in presidential elections is now out w/ issue and page numbers 🥳

Key finding: Being an incumbent president comes w/ inherent electoral advantages after 1 term. After 2 terms, a party is not inherently *dis*advantaged--just no more incumbency advantage.
uptonorwell.bsky.social
A look at partisanship in the U.S. right now--what partisans will tolerate, what they won't, and where the parties differ.

(From an ongoing project with @iganson.bsky.social; n = ~1,100; graph made in @statacorp.bsky.social 😊)
uptonorwell.bsky.social
Yes! Though it looks like it’s restricted to “methodology papers” and meta-analyses (?)
uptonorwell.bsky.social
Hard to express what a relief it is to have just submitted the first complete draft of my book manuscript to @ucpress.bsky.social 😮‍💨🥳

5+ years in the making.
249 pages.
82,000 words.
0 ChatGPT. 😉

A million thanks to all those who gave me guidance and inspired me along the way! 🙏
uptonorwell.bsky.social
For those currently writing and/or grading papers, always good to keep this distinction in mind
uptonorwell.bsky.social
It makes sense, yep. Unfortunately, though, people can easily forget over time...

BUT, per your idea about taking actual econ courses, there is definitely some evidence that those with higher education are better on this question

References

Fields & subjects

Updated 1m