Connor Stedman
connorstedman.bsky.social
Connor Stedman
@connorstedman.bsky.social
710 followers 1.3K following 2.3K posts
Land, ag, climate, systems thinking, history. A Holocene, if you can keep it.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by Connor Stedman
And it has been long enough now for smart, honest people to know and do better.
That “working class” is a transparently race and gender coded term tells you who pundits view as low and middle income workers and what type of work they believe “counts” among this group.

Reality: the working class is predominantly White women and racial minorities in the low wage service sector.
Yeah this has been clear as a potential tail end Very Bad result of this admin since before inauguration.
Reposted by Connor Stedman
Useful to think of the knock on effects on groceries, etc.

Among other things, SNAP is a subsidy to employers who pay their employees below what they need to eat.
Most fascinating figure in the regime and it’s not close.
Reposted by Connor Stedman
It is actually incredibly condescending to just assume “normal” people don’t care about being spit on, constantly, by the ruling party
Reposted by Connor Stedman
On a deadly serious note, the President cannot rely on external, private sources to fund spending as an end-run around Congress’ constitutional power of the purse. If he can, we no longer have a republic.
Reposted by Connor Stedman
The Founders anticipated the possibility of a corrupt, venal, lawbreaking, wannabe monarch president.

What they did not expect is numerous people achieving prominent national office and not wanting to guard their own power. The combo of ego to run but pathetic absence of ego in office stands out.
Yeah this is spot on. 50%+1 in the electoral college means a two-party system, and that means big tent parties that work out coalition power sharing and platforms through primaries, and the far-right capture of the GOP means these very predictable tensions in the other tent.
Reposted by Connor Stedman
Corollary: Americans don't talk about this gender issue as a gender issue bc it would spotlight the ways our society depends on *systemic* oppression & exploitation of women.

We can't talk about that bc life without an unpaid female servant class would be nasty, brutish & short for a lot of men.
Reposted by Connor Stedman
It's normal that someone may not clock all forms of Nazi iconography on sight, but this is not something you can claim is ambiguous in good faith if you look at the evidence. It's like saying "how can you distinguish a swastika from a buch of lines at right angles?" Agnosticism as sophistry.
It’s amazing that “well *I* haven’t seen any ________” arguments even make it to print. The world is bigger than any one person’s perspective, that’s the whole reason to study something and learn from (or at least about!) people who aren’t us!
I don’t know how many times I have to say this but if you didn’t know any geek girls in high school or you don’t know any now it’s because they didn’t trust you and you’re *NOT A SAFE PERSON* for women to be themselves around.
okay grandpa, let's get you to bed
Which is a level of grace and credulity that the Times has never granted to any previous president in US history. It’s insulting to readers’ intelligence and they/we deserve a clear explanation of why.
Reposted by Connor Stedman
Very wild how much the mere concept of a Covid vaccine completely broke apart a large group of americans minds. Like 70% of streamers like “bro we gotta vote for the Nazis because someone told me to take medicine”
Reposted by Connor Stedman
this is just happening in the open
“The department declined to answer questions about whether the donor is an American citizen or a foreign national.” Jesus Fucking Christ
Reposted by Connor Stedman
it’s not just a totenkopf, its very explicitly *the totenkopf* for the ss death head’s units who administered the concentration camps and were responsible for various acts of terror against civilian populations. like come the fuck on
because it's fucking identical to the SS logo! as like, a second's research makes clear. why are all these guys such fucking liars?
I mean it’s not an exaggeration, this is the NYT’s repeated framing on blatantly illegal action after blatantly illegal action. It’s fundamentally accepting the premise that Trump is king because he says he is.
'Some from the left criticized President Trump for the shooting. But it is not yet clear whether the killing violates a law prohibiting murder.'
New York Times reports that it is unclear whether having a federal agency accept money in excess of congressional appropriations "violates a law prohibiting federal agencies from accepting money in excess of congressional appropriations." I guess we'll never know!
Reposted by Connor Stedman
'Some from the left criticized President Trump for the shooting. But it is not yet clear whether the killing violates a law prohibiting murder.'
New York Times reports that it is unclear whether having a federal agency accept money in excess of congressional appropriations "violates a law prohibiting federal agencies from accepting money in excess of congressional appropriations." I guess we'll never know!
Reposted by Connor Stedman
As folks are noting, $130m isn't anywhere near enough to actually pay the troops; the DoD spends something like $16bn on personnel costs per month.

It is, however, more than enough to send everyone to prison for a couple of years under the antideficiency act for improperly appropriating funds.
We literally have laws!!! Who will stop this!!!
Reposted by Connor Stedman
The dude who singlehandedly controls the government is demanding it pay him a quarter of a billion dollars of our tax money as restitution for having been caught committing crimes.

He’s discovered forms of looting no one ever even thought possible.
I liked it but the score made no sense to me, did not connect.
Deb Haaland might be in the running here.
Reposted by Connor Stedman
Not trying to exaggerate: this feels like one of the most important speeches in American politics since 2016, if not since 2001
Mamdani: "In many ways, I have become that same uncle who pulled me aside six years ago. No more."