Joseph Rezek
@rezekjoe.bsky.social
14K followers 3.9K following 6.1K posts
English Prof and Director of American Studies at Boston University. Gay dad and husband. 2024-2025 NEH fellow for “The Racialization of Print,” forthcoming from OIEAHC & UNC Press. https://www.bu.edu/english/profile/joseph-rezek/
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
rezekjoe.bsky.social
I just submitted my book for peer review. After 15 years of thinking, researching, and writing, and, as I keep saying, an NEH this year to finish up. I’m furious about the gutting of that institution, which makes so much knowledge possible. I hope this book eventually lives up to that honor.
Screen shot of my table of contents: The Racialization of Print
By Joseph Rezek, Boston University
Omohundro Institute of Early American History and Culture and the University of North
Carolina Press (under contract)
For peer review only, do not cite or circulate without permission.
Introduction: Print's Racialization over the longue durée
Chapter 1. The Europeanization of Print in the Early Anglophone Atlantic

Chapter 2. Nominal White Authorship at the end of the Seventeenth Century

Chapter 3. Race, Gender, and Genius in the Eighteenth Century

Chapter 4. Phillis Wheatley and Her Books

Chapter 5. Haiti's Media Revolution

Chapter 6. Native American Print Sovereignty, 1826-1837

Chapter 7. The Specimen Logic of Print in the Nineteenth Century

Bibliography

Word Count: 142,647
Reposted by Joseph Rezek
okthen25.bsky.social
This 👇🏼👇🏼
rezekjoe.bsky.social
Can an historian of journalism please explain to me how the rule developed where a president says something, it has to be taken seriously as possibly true, even if it is obviously false. This rule must have a history (meaning, it can change! That is my point!)
rezekjoe.bsky.social
Peaceful protest is as American as apple pie. The No Kings protests exemplify that tradition - for GOP leaders to come out and accuse them of hating America means the leadership must truly be terrified of the groundswell of righteous nonviolent anger they have unleashed.
sethabramson.bsky.social
Yes, America, he is referring to the 100% peaceful No Kings rallies that have literally nothing to do with Hamas or antifa or hating America.

America has been gaslit by these lunatics every day for a decade, and at some point the other shoe will drop—though I have no idea what or when that will be.
Reposted by Joseph Rezek
ashtonpittman.bsky.social
ICE left David, a 17-year-old boy, stranded on the side of Interstate 20 after pulling over his immigrant father, Hector, in Mississippi.

David began running in the scorching sun after the car and watched as it disappeared from sight—soon headed to a Louisiana ICE prison.

Here's their story.
ICE Stranded a 17-Year-Old on I-20 After Arresting His Father. The Mississippi Dad Now Faces Deportation.
A 17-year-old watched as ICE arrested his immigrant father, Hector, on I-20 in June. The family faces mounting legal fees and the risk of deportation.
www.mississippifreepress.org
Reposted by Joseph Rezek
rezekjoe.bsky.social
Can an historian of journalism please explain to me how the rule developed where a president says something, it has to be taken seriously as possibly true, even if it is obviously false. This rule must have a history (meaning, it can change! That is my point!)
Reposted by Joseph Rezek
rezekjoe.bsky.social
I fucking love buying books.
Reposted by Joseph Rezek
rezekjoe.bsky.social
It might even be YOUR book I am buying
Reposted by Joseph Rezek
melly253.bsky.social
Buy books because digital print can be altered. Buying books is an act of resistance, especially banned books. I support indie bookstores and I also buy every banned book I see.
rezekjoe.bsky.social
I fucking love buying books.
Reposted by Joseph Rezek
kellybdevoe.bsky.social
And then never reading them, it’s my favorite
rezekjoe.bsky.social
I fucking love buying books.
rezekjoe.bsky.social
Books are soooooo gay 🥳🌈🥇
Reposted by Joseph Rezek
lfschleusener.bsky.social
Eminently relatable gay content
rezekjoe.bsky.social
I fucking love buying books.
Reposted by Joseph Rezek
rezekjoe.bsky.social
I am buying another book RIGHT NOW
rezekjoe.bsky.social
I need to hold them in my hands! Lift! Turn! Close! Pick up!!!
rezekjoe.bsky.social
I fucking love buying books.
rezekjoe.bsky.social
Tfw you’ve been writing a book for so long that you need to cite recent scholarship indebted to your previously published work from said book. 👑
rezekjoe.bsky.social
Leadership is, indeed, possible.
chanda.blacksky.app
MIT President Sally Kornbluth just issued a statement to the campus community saying NO to Trump’s authoritarian compact

“And fundamentally, the premise of the document is inconsistent with our core belief that scientific funding should be based on scientific merit alone.”
Dear Madam Secretary,
I write in response to your letter of October 1, inviting MIT to review a "Compact for Academic Excellence in Higher Education." I acknowledge the vital importance of these matters.
I appreciated the chance to meet with you earlier this year to discuss the priorities we share for American higher education.
As we discussed, the Institute's mission of service to the nation directs us to advance knowledge, educate students and bring knowledge to bear on the world's great challenges. We do that in line with a clear set of values, with excellence above all. Some practical examples:
• MIT prides itself on rewarding merit.
Students, faculty and staff succeed here based on the strength of their talent, ideas and hard work. For instance, the Institute
was the first to reinstate the SAT/ACT requirement after the pandemic. And MIT has never had legacy preferences in admissions. • MIT opens its doors to the most talented students regardless of their family's finances. Admissions are need-blind. Incoming undergraduates whose families earn less than $200,000 a year pay no tuition. Nearly 88% of our last graduating class left MIT with no debt for their education. We make a wealth of free courses and low-cost certificates available
to any American with an internet
connection. Of the undergraduate degrees we award, 94% are in STEM fields. And in service to the nation, we cap enrollment of international undergraduates at roughly
10%.
• We value free expression, as clearly described in the MIT Statement on Freedom of Expression and Academic Freedom. We must hear facts and opinions we don't like - and engage respectfully with those with whom we disagree. These values and other MIT practices meet or exceed many standards outlined in the document you sent. We freely choose these values because they're right, and we live by them because they support our mission - work of immense value to the prosperity, competitiveness, health and security of the United States. And of course, MIT abides by the law.
The document also includes principles with which we disagree, including those that would restrict freedom of expression and our independence as an institution. And fundamentally, the premise of the document is inconsistent with our core belief that scientific
funding should be based on scientific merit alone.
In our view, America's leadership in science and innovation depends on independent thinking and open competition for excellence. In that tree marketplace of ideas, the people of MIT gladly compete with the very best, without preferences.
Therefore, with respect, we cannot support the proposed approach to addressing the issues facing higher education. As you know, MIT's record of service to the nation is long and enduring. Eight decades ago, MIT leaders helped invent a scientific partnership between America's research universities and the
U.S. government that has delivered extraordinary benefits for the American people.
We continue to believe in the power of this partnership to serve the nation.
Sincerely,
Sally Kornbluth
CC
Ms. May Mailman
Mr. Vincent Haley
Reposted by Joseph Rezek
byjoshmoody.bsky.social
MIT rejects "compact" proposed by the Trump administration.
MIT prez wrote: it "would restrict freedom of expression and our independence as an institution" and "is inconsistent with our core belief that scientific funding should be based on scientific merit alone."
orgchart.mit.edu/letters/rega...
Regarding the Compact | MIT Organization Chart
orgchart.mit.edu