Charlie Thomas
@cthomasjamh.bsky.social
6.5K followers 800 following 3.2K posts
Professor, African Military Historian, Co-Editor of the Journal of African Military History. Opinions expressed are solely mine. My book, Ujamaa’s Army, is available now!! https://www.ohioswallow.com/9780821425596/ujamaas-army
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
cthomasjamh.bsky.social
For all my new followers, hello! I am a historian of African militaries and African military history- and I recently published a book on the Tanzania People's Defence Forces' fascinating history! Here's a thread about why you should read it! bsky.app/profile/ctho...
cthomasjamh.bsky.social
"But Charlie!" you may say, "why should *I* care about the Tanzania People's Defence Force!?" Well let me tell you a few cool things about them!

1. Following independence most African states just inherited whatever colonial troops existed as their militaries. This often led to coups and mutinies.
cthomasjamh.bsky.social
Whooooo! Although I know other folks have already gotten it, my author copies finally arrived. It's been a long road and it still feels unreal to actually have the physical copies in hand!
Reposted by Charlie Thomas
sadcpolicyfeed.bsky.social
DRC | M23 rebels threaten to overthrow Congo’s government, but analysts suggest the offensive may be aimed at gaining leverage in Doha peace talks rather than a real march toward Kinshasa. The conflict’s instability risks deepening regional insecurity across Central Africa.
Congo: Are M23 rebels really advancing toward Kinshasa?
 In the Democratic Republic of Congo, M23 rebels threaten to overthrow the government in Kinshasa. But experts say that the escalating war could be nothing more than a means of influencing the peace talks between in Doha.
www.dw.com
cthomasjamh.bsky.social
A more knowledgeable person than I notes the central and absolutely disqualifying issues here. Thanks Mike!
mikeblack114.bsky.social
Negative

For starters as a logical matter there is no universe in which this meets the intended purpose of reprogramming language

But as a legal matter you've got to have a valid appropriation to transfer the monies into

Congress appropriates some things on a multi-year basis and others annual
egojunk.bsky.social
The DoD is allowed to transfer this money per statute apparently (though this is outside of my area). The CR in March upped it to 8 billion.
Reposted by Charlie Thomas
Reposted by Charlie Thomas
mikeblack114.bsky.social
It probably goes without saying the financial nuts and bolts of the world's largest organization are complex, but like we almost accidentally did tens of thousands of anti-deficiency act violations the other day because a thing was set a way that made sense in normal times but no one noticed it now
mikeblack114.bsky.social
as a practical matter I'm legitimately unsure how this would work with DFAS, like this might actually Break Something Important
mikeblack114.bsky.social
I understand the optics here but this is also literally why Charles met his end in Whitehall, either Article I means what it says or it doesn't and the Constitution is dissolved
Reposted by Charlie Thomas
hilzoy.bsky.social
Nothing says Competent and Humane Management like firing a bunch of your best people by mistake and saying Oops! Sorry! A day later.
sherylnyt.bsky.social
OOOPS! UPDATE: Two HHS officials tell me that disease detectives, measles response officers, global health officials and the MMWR staff were laid off by mistake and will be reinstated. But Washington office is still RIFed
sherylnyt.bsky.social
BREAKING: Friday night massacre underway at CDC. Doznes of "disease detectives," high-level scientists, entire Washington staff and editors of the MMWR (Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report) have all been RIFed and received the following notice:
Reposted by Charlie Thomas
mikeblack114.bsky.social
Correct

Reprogramming is intended (and the language is written) to give the Executive latitude to not be overly strictured because when we're talking about almost a trillion dollars a few billion might not be 100% aligned

But it is ALWAYS done in consultation with approps, particularly their PSMs
mattsepara.bsky.social
I don't think people really understand the idea that Congress controls the purse strings and how important it is to the Constitutional order. It literally prevents the executive from doing anything without Congress providing the money. This is a power Congress has VERY closely guarded.
Reposted by Charlie Thomas
lethalityjane.bsky.social
We're sending squad-sized elements to secure the Bass Pro Shop
Screencap of an AP article 

MEMPHIS, Tenn. (AP) — National Guard troops patrolled in Tennessee’s second-largest city for the first time Friday while soldiers in Illinois were engaged only in planning and training after a judge handed a loss to the Trump administration and blocked their deployment to the Chicago area.

At least nine armed Guard members began their patrol at the Bass Pro Shops located at the Pyramid, an iconic Memphis landmark, about a mile (1.6 kilometers) from historic Beale Street and FedEx Forum, where the NBA’s Grizzlies play
cthomasjamh.bsky.social
Yeah- I don’t think so either. After discussing it more with @gigansprogress.bsky.social (who is more knowledgeable than me) I think they are deeply torturing the meaning of something intended to cover cost overages for shipbuilding or the like.
cthomasjamh.bsky.social
Right? They are torturing the meaning of a statute and likely hobbling several R&D lines of effort to buy... two weeks? Okay, sure, I guess.
Reposted by Charlie Thomas
mcgwh.bsky.social
If eight billion can be reallocated that should cover a two week pay period. Based on FY 2025 allocation of 15.2 billion a month in monthly payroll for uniformed service members.

Also won’t cover the Coast
guard unless the Department of Homeland Security can reallocate funds.
cthomasjamh.bsky.social
So this is interesting- there may be a legal path to transfer some monies to cover pay but a) this specific use might still be debatable and b) $8bn might sound like a lot but it won’t cover these costs for long. Active Duty payroll plus retirements is ~$190bn a year so this maybe gets us two weeks.
egojunk.bsky.social
The DoD is allowed to transfer this money per statute apparently (though this is outside of my area). The CR in March upped it to 8 billion.
cthomasjamh.bsky.social
and even then that is a tortured reading of this statute (are R&D Funds "available for the same purposes" as actually paying troops?) that maybe buys them a pay period before the $8bn is used up. That may be what is required here to get everything sewn up, but I haven't seen any indications for that
cthomasjamh.bsky.social
There’s also the question of how quickly this can be done even if it fits the legal use of the funds and such. We’re still at the “~24 hours to meet Wednesday suspense” timeline.
cthomasjamh.bsky.social
So this is interesting- there may be a legal path to transfer some monies to cover pay but a) this specific use might still be debatable and b) $8bn might sound like a lot but it won’t cover these costs for long. Active Duty payroll plus retirements is ~$190bn a year so this maybe gets us two weeks.
egojunk.bsky.social
The DoD is allowed to transfer this money per statute apparently (though this is outside of my area). The CR in March upped it to 8 billion.
Of course it has. It always does. Sec 8005 of DOD Appropriations, for starters… That one provision now allows for $8b in transfers, per March’s full year CR:
Reposted by Charlie Thomas
vivian-m-lumbard.bsky.social
Possible way to transfer monies lawfully, but I'm not sure payroll qualifies under the statute and in essence, by not funding the budget with a CR.
egojunk.bsky.social
The DoD is allowed to transfer this money per statute apparently (though this is outside of my area). The CR in March upped it to 8 billion.
Of course it has. It always does. Sec 8005 of DOD Appropriations, for starters… That one provision now allows for $8b in transfers, per March’s full year CR:
cthomasjamh.bsky.social
So for those wondering about the mechanics of paying the troops and why “just use other money!”
might go wrong, here’s a good explainer.
gigansprogress.bsky.social
Because of how complex defense accounting is and how the money crosses different years and programs, DFAS is set up specifically to draw at those dates from those programs. You can't just create $15b dollars, you need to allocate it across a bunch of different areas and subsequently pull from/
Reposted by Charlie Thomas
gigansprogress.bsky.social
DFAS does not work this way and they'd have to do some Real Adult Crimes to move this money around that is specifically earmarked for MILPERS, and not in the cute way they've raided MILCON or nuclear modernization programs in the past
gigansprogress.bsky.social
"Money Colors Are A Thing" I shriek, as I am walled up like Fortunato
cthomasjamh.bsky.social
We literally signed the Atlantic Charter with Britain, committing our side to eliminating colonialism and conquest, four months before we entered the war. These people are illiterate.
cthomasjamh.bsky.social
Yeah- what he is committing to is transferring money from one pot to another in a way that is not normally legally allowed and then demanding the payroll system process it (with said questionable money), all in roughly 24 hours (holiday weekend) with a likely mostly furloughed office.
cthomasjamh.bsky.social
Leftists read about the Atlantic Charter Challenge: Impossible.
cthomasjamh.bsky.social
I mean the combo between “oops guess we screwed up” and the panic of trying to find a couple billion dollars to loan out on 3 days notice (mil payroll is how much?) was never going to lead to good outcomes here.
Reposted by Charlie Thomas
davelevitan.bsky.social
“We can give $20 billion to Argentina but we can’t afford the CDC’s measles experts” is a hell of an argument
cthomasjamh.bsky.social
Whole different stove that is heating up reeeeaalllly fast here. Almost every uniformed person I know said their first step was the interest free USAA or NFCU loan to carry them over any bumps.
dflawrence.bsky.social
Troops stung by ‘hard’ credit checks and unexpected denials in USAA’s relief loans — latest from me @taskandpurpose.com

One soldier messaged USAA’s chatbot about his denied loan. It pushed a credit card, then said to consider opening an account with Navy Fed.
taskandpurpose.com/military-lif...
Troops stung by ‘hard’ credit checks and unexpected denials in USAA’s relief loans
Some troops were surpised by hard credit checks and unexpected denials for relief loans by military-friendly lender USAA.
taskandpurpose.com