@graylola.bsky.social
240 followers 430 following 1K posts
Cats, food, law. Depending on the day.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted
internethippo.bsky.social
There's no "regular politics" anymore because you can no longer maintain the idea that we all agree on common goals but we only differ about the means of getting there or whatever. The guys in charge now are plainly amoral, sadistic nihilists. They delight in it! You can't civilly disagree with that
Reposted
neonchinchilla.bsky.social
Donald- So I just admit that I was wrong and I get to go into heaven?

Jesus- Yes my child. I paid the price for your sins when I died on the cross

Donald- But I have to admit I was wrong?

Jesus- Yes my child.

Donald- I like messiahs who weren't crucified.
Reposted
ceej.online
caught my vampire neighbor creeping through my front door. he claims my saying “for sure dude, we should definitely hang out sometime” the other night counts as an invitation, but I disagree. we’re on hold with the etiquette hotline
Reposted
meredithshiner.com
It’s impossible to overstate how much “abolish ice” is the normie position now here in chicago — just countless random moms at toddler soccer on a park district field asking me where I bought my anti-ice t-shirt. average people don’t like our neighborhoods being terrorized.
lauraolin.bsky.social
A friend ran the Chicago marathon today and said he couldn’t count the number of FUCK ICE signs along the way.
Reposted
aricohn.com
Some weirdo on Twitter has been absolutely melting down for like 36 straight hours because I posted:

When this is over, do not forget what ICE did, and what ICE is. And do not make room for them in society. Make sure they know that they are, and will continue to be, reviled and beneath contempt.
Reposted
juliusgoat.bsky.social
The Supreme Court of the United States is not a legitimate body.
leahlitman.bsky.social
More judges speak to the press (the NYT) about what a disaster the Supreme Court (specifically the shadow docket) has been - “incredibly demoralizing & troubling”; a “judicial crisis”; a “slap in the face to district courts.” www.nytimes.com/2025/10/11/u...
Excerpts Excerpts
Reposted
andrewtorrez.bsky.social
Come for "how do we teach con law in an era of madness?" and stay for "what exactly IS stare decisis, and how badly has the Roberts Court butchered it??"

with @espinsegall.bsky.social and of course @lizdye.bsky.social
Reposted
kenwhite.bsky.social
On the 18th we need to be vigilant for increased violence and provocation by both law enforcement and counter-protestors, both of which will be used to try to justify more violence and authoritarianism.
Reposted
brianbeutler.bsky.social
They’re scared so they want to scare us.
kevinmkruse.bsky.social
The Speaker of the House is telling the Fox News audience that a peaceful demonstration by Americans on the National Mall will actually be a gathering of organizations the administration has designated as violent terrorists.

Seems bad?
atrupar.com
Mike Johnson: "We're so angry about it. I mean, I'm a very patient guy, but I've had it with these people. The theory we have right now -- they have a hate America rally that's scheduled for October 18 on the National Mall. It's the pro-Hamas wing and antifa people ... "
graylola.bsky.social
Well now I'm definitely going to a protest that day.
kevinmkruse.bsky.social
The House Majority Whip is also insisting that a peaceful "No Kings" demonstration is in fact a "hate America rally" held for the "terrorist wing" of the Democratic Party.

Really feels like they're trying to manifest a violent reaction to it.
atrupar.com
Emmer: "This is about one thing and one thing alone -- to score political points with the terrorist wing of their party, which is set to hold a hate America rally in DC next week."
graylola.bsky.social
Fuck this guy
atrupar.com
Mike Johnson: "We're so angry about it. I mean, I'm a very patient guy, but I've had it with these people. The theory we have right now -- they have a hate America rally that's scheduled for October 18 on the National Mall. It's the pro-Hamas wing and antifa people ... "
graylola.bsky.social
Which ultimately leads to bad cases because a regular jury will hear that and likely lose.
michaeljstern.bsky.social
I presented DOJ cases to grand juries for 25 years. Cases can be legally -but unethically- influenced by the prosecutor.

Exculpatory info like James telling her loan officer the property will NOT be her primary residence could be withheld. $18K being below pros guidelines would not be disclosed.
atrupar.com
i know grand juries have a relatively low bar for bringing indictments but i find myself wondering WTF is up with some of these grand jurors
Reposted
michaeljstern.bsky.social
I presented DOJ cases to grand juries for 25 years. Cases can be legally -but unethically- influenced by the prosecutor.

Exculpatory info like James telling her loan officer the property will NOT be her primary residence could be withheld. $18K being below pros guidelines would not be disclosed.
atrupar.com
i know grand juries have a relatively low bar for bringing indictments but i find myself wondering WTF is up with some of these grand jurors
Reposted
areidross.bsky.social
Wow, a person with power has said that continuous lying actually makes someone less than credible
jonseidel.bsky.social
U.S. District Judge April Perry says it comes down to a "credibility determination."

"I simply cannot credit [the Trump administration's] declarations to the extent they contradict state and local law enforcement. … DHS' perception of events are simply unreliable."
jonseidel.bsky.social
#BREAKING A federal judge say she will grant "in part" a request by the state of Illinois for a temporary restraining order against the deployment of National Guard troops into the state.

U.S. District Judge April Perry is still ruling and has not outlined the details of her order.
Reposted
marisakabas.bsky.social
it's only racial profiling if it comes from the racial profiling region of france. otherwise it's sparkling reasonable suspicion.
atrupar.com
McLaughlin: "Pritzker said there's racial profiling, which is absolutely false. Our officials use reasonable suspicion. That's protected under the US Constitution 4th Amendment."
Reposted
Reposted
amb.fyi
The Portland protest frog has done more to protect American democracy and fight fascism than all but the tiniest handful of elected officials
Reposted
golikehellmachine.com
THEY BREAK UPON US
hurricanexyz.bsky.social
Battle of Portland goes to the home team
Reposted
anthonymkreis.bsky.social
contracts professor / torts professor / constitutional law professor
Reposted
solomonmissouri.bsky.social
This Keith Urban man is not smart
Reposted
rincewind.run
this timeline is so surreal

collapse of the republic!

football!

bluesky moderation meltdown!

collapse of the republic some more!

more football!

the republic: still collapsing!
Reposted
kenwhite.bsky.social
Every DoJ attorney promoting and defending at this stuff should never again eat food that is less than 10% spit