It could always be worse
She/her
$33M is 358 assistant professors. Or about fourteen percent of the total number of full-time faculty at Michigan State.
He went 9-15 in two seasons, including 1-8 in the Big Ten this year. (ESPN first reported).
MSU players meeting called for 2:45. Smith has a $33 million buyout (with offset).
$33M is 358 assistant professors. Or about fourteen percent of the total number of full-time faculty at Michigan State.
Doesn't seem like despots, dictators and crony capitalists really care
www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025...
Doesn't seem like despots, dictators and crony capitalists really care
www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025...
Roll the clip:
Your opponents are running a historically corrupt government.
Be anti-corruption. Run on fixing the shit they broke, holding assholes accountable, and improving people’s lives.
Duh.
Your opponents are running a historically corrupt government.
Be anti-corruption. Run on fixing the shit they broke, holding assholes accountable, and improving people’s lives.
Duh.
We’ve petitioned AGSulzberger and NYT to bring back the Public Editor…
7/
We’ve petitioned AGSulzberger and NYT to bring back the Public Editor…
7/
to lead a panel on COVID vaccines.
Sabotaging vaccine research and increasing vaccine “hesitancy” will kill Americans.
6/
to lead a panel on COVID vaccines.
Sabotaging vaccine research and increasing vaccine “hesitancy” will kill Americans.
6/
These are editorial choices.
Excellent quotes from established experts like Drs. Offit, Osterholm and Marks are introduced later in the piece rather than frame the piece, the introduction or headline.
“anti-vaccine” makes an appearance later on
5/
These are editorial choices.
Excellent quotes from established experts like Drs. Offit, Osterholm and Marks are introduced later in the piece rather than frame the piece, the introduction or headline.
“anti-vaccine” makes an appearance later on
5/
Grotesque euphemism to describe acts that will kill people by subversion of established science and reality.
Alternatively do the NYT and author doubt vaccine science?
They are not “critics” they are science deniers.
4/
Grotesque euphemism to describe acts that will kill people by subversion of established science and reality.
Alternatively do the NYT and author doubt vaccine science?
They are not “critics” they are science deniers.
4/
The first paragraphs are pure stenography devoid of context or critical analysis.
This opening is as much a press release as it is a “scoop”.
3/
The first paragraphs are pure stenography devoid of context or critical analysis.
This opening is as much a press release as it is a “scoop”.
3/
Its failures are impactful.
See how NYT is the head of an information centipede: NYT-
Reuters-MSN
2/
Its failures are impactful.
See how NYT is the head of an information centipede: NYT-
Reuters-MSN
2/
This is profoundly irresponsible by AGSulzberger’s NYT, @by-cjewett.bsky.social +eds.
The normalization, “view-from-nowhere”, “born-yesterday”, stenography, “both-sides”, irresponsible headline are disgraceful.
THE story is the CDC&FDA are being destroyed by antiscience & Americans will die.
1/n
This is profoundly irresponsible by AGSulzberger’s NYT, @by-cjewett.bsky.social +eds.
The normalization, “view-from-nowhere”, “born-yesterday”, stenography, “both-sides”, irresponsible headline are disgraceful.
THE story is the CDC&FDA are being destroyed by antiscience & Americans will die.
1/n