Greenberg Visa Law
@asgvisalaw.bsky.social
910 followers 290 following 4.2K posts
Posts by immigration attorney Adam S. Greenberg (IANYL (yet))
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
asgvisalaw.bsky.social
The reference errors are just part of this. But there's also the Tro.
asgvisalaw.bsky.social
Probably both. They provided something fabricated (or real but out of context) and he massively exaggerated it.
asgvisalaw.bsky.social
Certainly not their contempt of Congress, the law, or the public
durbin.senate.gov
We were just denied entrance to the Broadview ICE facility in Illinois.

WHAT is the Trump Administration hiding?
asgvisalaw.bsky.social
Basically all _types_ might, but basically all individually? That's depressing if so.
asgvisalaw.bsky.social
Theology is not my area. That's an interesting distinction.
Reposted by Greenberg Visa Law
mjsdc.bsky.social
This arrest appears to be in direct violation of a temporary restraining order prohibiting DHS officers from arresting journalists. The officers here may well be subject to contempt of court. protectdemocracy.org/wp-content/u...
It is hereby ORDERED that Defendants,' their officers, agents, assigns, and all
persons acting in concert with them (hereafter referred to as "Federal Agents"), are temporarily
ENJOINED in this judicial district from:
a.
Dispersing, arresting, threatening to arrest, threatening or using physical
force against any person whom they know or reasonably should know is a Journalist, unless Defendants have probable cause to believe that the individual has committed a crime.
asgvisalaw.bsky.social
The whole agency is run by a dog murderess; it's agency policy to kill them it seems.
davidjbier.bsky.social
So agents trespassed into a citizen’s home on a fishing expedition and murdered their dog kfoxtv.com/news/local/e...
asgvisalaw.bsky.social
This certainly doesn't seem like "the least restrictive means of furthering that compelling governmental interest" in restricting the free exercise of religion.
unraveledpress.com
Some clergy are begging to be allowed closer to the detention center to perform communion.

"You are preventing our religious freedom," someone in the crowd shouts.
asgvisalaw.bsky.social
Okay. Soldiers terrorizing DC to the right. Bonus Army to the left.
fritschner.bsky.social
A few minutes ago in the House:

- Speaker Mike Johnson officially cancels votes next week, extending the House recess through a fourth week

- House Republicans block Democrats from passing a bill to pay the troops during the shutdown, ensuring they will miss paychecks next week
House Press Gallery: During today's pro forma session, the Clerk read a message from the Speaker designating Tuesday, October 14 through Sunday, October 19 as a district work period. Punchbowl's Briana Reilly: House gaveled in and out of its pro forma just now w/o recognizing Rep Elfreth, who was seeking to UC a mil pay bill from Rep Sykes. 

Elfreth told reporters after that House Dems stand “ready and willing to take” up standalone legislation to pay troops.
asgvisalaw.bsky.social
There are laws prohibiting conspiring with third countries on constructive refoulement though.
rparloff.bsky.social
Judge: there are no regs that prevent DHS or ICE from finding 3d country for someone with withholding order.
S: correct

J: Let's break till 1:15pm.
RECESS

/89
Reposted by Greenberg Visa Law
lizdye.bsky.social
They make up lies about paid agitators doing violence, and attach them to the name of a prominent Jewish person. This is antisemitism, and it infects every part of the GOP.
atrupar.com
Sen. Roger Marshall: "October 18 is when the protest gets here. This will be a Soros paid-for protest for his professional protesters. The agitators show up. We'll have to get the National Guard out. Hopefully it will be peaceful. I doubt it."
asgvisalaw.bsky.social
New 13th Amendment jurisprudence incoming.
atrupar.com
Hegseth: "I'm also proud that today we're signing a letter of acceptance to build a Qatari Emeri air force facility at the Mountain Home Airbase in Idaho."
asgvisalaw.bsky.social
[ICE officer stubs their toe]

ICE spox: Assaults on officers are up infinite percent in mere seconds.
asgvisalaw.bsky.social
For what it's worth, the only remaining justice from Zadvydas is Thomas, and he signed on to both dissents, if that gives people any idea where this is heading.
rparloff.bsky.social
At 11am I will try to live-blog, for @lawfaremedia.org , the hearing in Abrego Garcia’s civil (habeas corpus) case in federal court in Greenbelt MD. Abrego is seeking release from detention under a SCOTUS precedent called Zadvydas v Davis (2001). ...
/1
tile.loc.gov/storage-serv...
Reposted by Greenberg Visa Law
reichlinmelnick.bsky.social
Also, a total lie that American students have been crowded out by international students. International students effectively subsidize the tuition of American students!
jameeljaffer.bsky.social
Quite a feat to go from this to "and therefore universities must ban faculty and students from belittling conservative ideas"
asgvisalaw.bsky.social
Seems like the National Guard needs to be given the vital mission of leaving. It's a bold tactic to quell problems.
rlgardner190.bsky.social
This is some really weird logic. If you remove the National Guard from the city, the "problem" disappears, but the "problem" requires that the National Guard be present to put it down!
froomkin.bsky.social
Judge who has been asked to block National Guard deployment in Chicago asks DOJ a key question: What if it's the feds who are provoking the violence, rather than stopping it? DOJ says it doesn't matter.
asgvisalaw.bsky.social
Apparently evicting EOIR from the building didn't buy them enough room.
ryandeto.bsky.social
NEW - The feds are seeking Pittsburgh office space for an unspecified law enforcement agency expansion in the region. Reporting from WaPo and NPR indicate that ICE is behind the request as part of a 10,000 officer nationwide expansion www.axios.com/local/pittsb...
Feds quietly plan Pittsburgh office for unspecified law enforcement
NPR and the Washington Post both reported last month that the office space request is being made on behalf of ICE.
www.axios.com
asgvisalaw.bsky.social
That's backwards anyway. The rat-est city would be the one _not_ exterminating them.
asgvisalaw.bsky.social
Is this a big deal? Not usually, though I could construct a situation where filing a day earlier could make a significant difference in someone's life. It's more just they're off on their "we get to carry guns now" frolic and detour and can't even read the statute they enforce. 3/3
asgvisalaw.bsky.social
But the statute actually says _three months_. Now, 90 days and three months are close to each other but not identical (except sometimes in the winter), so most of the time, you should actually be able to file a day or two earlier than USCIS says you can. 2/
8 USC §1445 [INA § 334]. Application for naturalization; declaration of intention

(a) Evidence and form
An applicant for naturalization shall make and file with the Attorney General a sworn application in writing, signed by the applicant in the applicant’s own handwriting if physically able to write, which application shall be on a form prescribed by the Attorney General and shall include averments of all facts which in the opinion of the Attorney General may be material to the applicant’s naturalization, and required to be proved under this subchapter. In the case of an applicant subject to a requirement of continuous residence under section 1427(a) or 1430(a) of this title, the application for naturalization may be filed up to 3 months before the date the applicant would first otherwise meet such continuous residence requirement.
asgvisalaw.bsky.social
DHS is so busy being evil that I sometimes forget just how bad they are at their regular jobs. The USCIS policy manual (and their online filing system) say we can file naturalization applications up to 90 days before reaching the required residence period, citing to INA §334. 1/
D. 90-Day Early Filing Provision (INA 334)

An applicant filing under the general naturalization provision may file his or her application up to 90 days before he or she would first meet the required 5-year period of continuous residence as an LPR.[14] Although an applicant may file early according to the 90 day early filing provision, the applicant is not eligible for naturalization until he or she has reached the required five-year period of continuous residence as a lawful permanent resident (LPR).

USCIS calculates the early filing period by counting back 90 days from the day before the applicant would have first satisfied the continuous residence requirement for naturalization. For example, if the applicant would satisfy the five-year continuous residence requirement for the first time on June 10, 2010 USCIS will begin to calculate the 90-day early filing period from June 9, 2010. In such a case, the earliest that the applicant is allowed to file would be March 12, 2010 (90 calendar days earlier).
asgvisalaw.bsky.social
That always bothered me. Even the Phanatic dresses for each occasion. Why can't they?
Phillie Phanatic in white tie dress (minus pants, naturally)
asgvisalaw.bsky.social
She should promise to invade Pennsylvania; you will be greeted as liberators.
asgvisalaw.bsky.social
"My lawyer charges me for phone calls" is not grounds for requesting information from another lawyer entirely.

Not hiring that person as substitute counsel, mind you. Requesting free labor from them so you don't have to pay your regular lawyer for the call.