https://cameronpatrick.com/
1️⃣"What is your research question?"
2️⃣"What do YOU think is going on?"
"It's due Sunday at 11:59 PM"
"Where are your citations?"
1️⃣"What is your research question?"
2️⃣"What do YOU think is going on?"
(I, too, believe that we should keep billionaires in California though. then build a wall around California to stop them leaving)
(I, too, believe that we should keep billionaires in California though. then build a wall around California to stop them leaving)
It took me a while to realize how bonkers this is. It's saying some important primary users of the knowledge created are unable to understand what they're reading.
"It is clear that the benefits of cycling outweigh the risks, with helmet legislation actually costing society more from lost health gains than saved from injury prevention." theconversation.com/ditching-bik...
I've had the same thought, that the flood of LLM-written junk and fraudulent manuscripts being submitted to journals means that
I've had the same thought, that the flood of LLM-written junk and fraudulent manuscripts being submitted to journals means that
Pop sci mostly reaches educated, left-leaning, wealthy readers — including, of course, scientists and science writers.
I increasingly believe the gap between the real general audience and what's called "general audience" in scicomm is huge and worth talking about: 🧪
📅Feb 5, 1772 Pierre Simon Laplace presented his first probability memoir to the Acadmie des Sciences
1810: Proof of the central limit theorem-- why sums of variables tend to be close to the normal
📅Feb 5, 1772 Pierre Simon Laplace presented his first probability memoir to the Acadmie des Sciences
1810: Proof of the central limit theorem-- why sums of variables tend to be close to the normal