CB
@cbowers.bsky.social
1.1K followers 770 following 14K posts
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
cbowers.bsky.social
Been a while since I mentioned it-

I'm an attorney in the Portland, OR area currently running a solo practice but looking for a position with a firm
cbowers.bsky.social
Lots of people are denying that crimes were committed. Sorry that you’re unaware of facts
cbowers.bsky.social
there's an old Looney Tunes cartoon where a guy drives his dog deep into the woods, throws a stick, and tries to drive away before the dog gets back

to be clear, this is not legal advice on how to deal with your elderly parents
cbowers.bsky.social
Trying to figure out moving dad to a nursing home. Bro and I figure we need to figure out his $ situation, so I call to get his login information

Pitch for a comedy or my afternoon?
cbowers.bsky.social
enough commas in the payment and I'd do it
Reposted by CB
oregonzoo.bsky.social
Juno is a clam dunk champion 🏀
cbowers.bsky.social
Ingrassia is an obvious pervert, and based on this letter I suspect Mr. Paltzik is as well

(Mr Ingrassia and Mr Paltzik - my DMs are open if you need contact information to serve me)
annabower.bsky.social
Paul Ingrassia is now threatening to sue Politico:

“This vexatious political attack masquerading as "journalism" is defamatory and will be addressed in forthcoming litigation.”
October 10, 2025
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Re: Statement on behalf of my client Paul Ingrassia regarding last night's story, Key Trump nominee accused of sexual harassment, POLITICO (Oct. 9, 2025), https://www.politico.com/news/2025/10/09/ingrassia-trump-harassment-dhs-
00596545
POLITICO's hit piece about Mr. Ingrassia is calculated to cause maximum harm to his promising career — and torpedo his nomination for Special Counsel. This vexatious political attack masquerading as "journalism" is defamatory and will be addressed in forthcoming litigation.
To be 100% crystal clear, so that there is zero room for doubt: Mr. Ingrassia did not engage in any wrongdoing in connection with the matters reported. As POLITICO itself reported: "The woman, whom POLITICO is not naming, said in a statement that she 'never felt uncomfortable' about Ingrassia's behavior and said she had never made a complaint." This is one of the only accurate parts of POLITICO's otherwise fantastical and fictional partisan fairy tale.
Accordingly, one last time, I call upon POLITICO to publicly apologize and issue a full retraction of this disgraceful and partisan sludge.
/s/ Edward Andrew Paltzik
taylordykema.com
cbowers.bsky.social
If you are a legal professional and are adding details about the VA property addressed in the Pulte referral letter I strongly suggest that you find a kindergarten teacher to help you with numbers. 20 and 23 are different!
cbowers.bsky.social
I'm seeing people with legal training comment on the Letitia James indictment while clearly not having bothered to even glance at the indictment. wtf, folks, you should know better
cbowers.bsky.social
It’s not that crazily high, since the intent can’t be implied fairly easily. With the facts here, though, and the vagueness in the indictment it’s probably beyond their reach
cbowers.bsky.social
I’m the sicko who likes to toy with them a little and then block
cbowers.bsky.social
the federal government has access to documents submitted to the federal government
cbowers.bsky.social
what is this information from?
cbowers.bsky.social
yes, you are very dumb
cbowers.bsky.social
wtf are you talking about? are you high right now?
cbowers.bsky.social
I'm sorry that you never learned to read
cbowers.bsky.social
truly the stupidest claims
cbowers.bsky.social
it's crazy to call someone a liar while making false claims against them. did you even read the indictment, simpleton?
cbowers.bsky.social
no, none of that is true
Reposted by CB
annabower.bsky.social
NEW: “The Justice Department seemed poised to pursue an indictment against Letitia James on pathetically weak charges. Yet the charges that actually ended up in the indictment a jury returned on Thursday may somehow be even weaker.”

By @mollyroberts.bsky.social

www.lawfaremedia.org/article/the-...
Courts & Litigation Criminal Justice & the Rule of Law
Executive Branch
The Justice Department's
Dangerously Weak Case Against
Letitia James
Molly Roberts
Friday, October 10, 2025, 12:20 PM
Share On: f X in
%
凸
Lindsey Halligan didn't have a strong case against Letitia James. She indicted her anyway.
cbowers.bsky.social
Her ethics disclosures show rental income in 2020(purchase was in August 2020), but none in 2021
Reposted by CB
kenwhite.bsky.social
Wen should direct more attention to incidents like these because Americans are more likely to respond to brutality to pets than to brutality to human beings.
thetnholler.bsky.social
EL PASO — a family says ICE showed up at their house looking for migrants and shot and KILLED THEIR DOG, then didn’t help them as the agent ran away and was not identified.

kfoxtv.com/news/local/e...
cbowers.bsky.social
I was previously unaware of the term, this bit from wikipedia makes it sound like a good life goal
cbowers.bsky.social
no, this transaction doesn't seem to have a clerical error