Interested Milwaukee Citizen
banner
citizenmke.bsky.social
Interested Milwaukee Citizen
@citizenmke.bsky.social
1.3K followers 250 following 2.9K posts
A semi-anonymous account for someone who wants to be active in Milwaukee community he calls home | he/him
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Or in a similar note “Mark Hamill from the animated Joker series”
The original I think would be “Alec Guinness from Star Wars”
I think everybody has a “Wallace Shawn from Young Sheldon” — my first one would probably be “Vincent Price, the guy who did the voice of Ratigan in The Great Mouse Detective”
Reposted by Interested Milwaukee Citizen
NYC is going to have the world's biggest media-manufactured crime panic in history the second Mamdani is elected. They aren't even going to wait until he is inaugurated. Whether or not you like the guy, you need to start preparing now for the fire hose of disinformation that is about to activate.
Reposted by Interested Milwaukee Citizen
You can tell the Dems are winning the shutdown battle because all the pundits stopped talking about the shutdown
I thought the old version of the 19 only ran every 45 min or worse (every 3rd 19 went beyond Zellman) so this was supposed to be slightly better but more reliable (since it breaks up the long route)
What could possibly have happened to need this kind of response? Is there like warzone going on?
Fucking hell, the sirens by Water St have been nonstop for like 30 min.
Yeah, I guess we would see a clearer fall off at $15 than at $7.25.

But raising the minimum wage to $15 probably helps half of all workers by either boosting them above that threshold or by benefiting from the upward pressure of competition against the minimum wage
Reposted by Interested Milwaukee Citizen
What's the economic theory on how a federal $15 minimum wage would change this graph? I guess it would apply upward pressure on wages $15-30 ish?
I stumbled upon the progressive version of not knowing what NAACP stands for lmao
Reposted by Interested Milwaukee Citizen
“Tragically, I cannot relinquish my emergency powers back to the Senate until General Grevious is destroyed. You have my assurance it is my top priority, Master Windu.“
Reposted by Interested Milwaukee Citizen
Genuinely hilarious that Bill Kristol has more moral clarity in the moment than Chuck Schumer
If I told 14 year old me this had happened hed say "time to cut back on the beer old man."
(Which is how basically every post war democracy operates as)

Even now Parliament is considered the ultimate authority in the UK
Reposted by Interested Milwaukee Citizen
"Having one person as chief executive is democracy’s Achilles heel, the structural feature most responsible for democratic erosion and constitutional capture."
The “moderate” candidate was proud to use Jefferson Davis’ desk while in the Senate and refused to cosponsor a resolution apologizing for the lack of action by the federal government against lynching during the 20th century.

He also represented MS in the senate since 1978 as a Republican
Even though both candidates were obviously bad for the Black community, one was way worse than the other, so holding one’s nose to vote for the less bad candidate is still better than not voting at all (and letting the worse candidate win)
This question reminds me of the 2014 Mississippi Senate election, in which the large Black community turned out to vote in the Republican primary to ensure the more moderate incumbent Thad Cochran survived a primary against the far-right Chris McDaniels.
I do think civil rights takes precedence over other important issues (like health care or taxes) and I think that we should vote for the candidate that will be better on civil rights.

More than 99% of the time, that will be the Democratic candidate.
That’s true. Outside of general elections, I’m in full support of taking a strong stand against those who would sacrifice civil rights for perceived political gain, when it goes against the very point of politics.
“Vote Blue No Matter Who” is about ensuring intra-party squabbles don’t result in a worse outcome: a Republican victory, who almost assuredly is worse on every issue than the Dem candidates in the primary
I do wish there was a better differentiation between primaries and general elections.

It’s one thing to write off a candidate in a primary for having terrible opinions, it’s another to continue that opposition when they’re running against Republicans.
Wait, there’s no byline? Is this written by AI?

There’s just no way to be accountable for what’s being said?