Cory "lives in the mountains" W
banner
coryw.bsky.social
Cory "lives in the mountains" W
@coryw.bsky.social
1.3K followers 1.2K following 8.9K posts
gay, minidisc, computers, old computers, chronic illness, trains, tech support in higher ed, southwest. (he/him)
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
here's the whole thing, dunno if the account or post is still up on Twitter to get a better screenshot, alas
Reposted by Cory "lives in the mountains" W
What started as a joke actually turned out pretty well. Keeping this in the back pocket for a future leasing company scheme.
Reposted by Cory "lives in the mountains" W
I wonder what percentage of the first fifty thousand users have crashed out (and I say this acknowledging I'm in that group lolol)
it's genuinely so wild how under a couple hundred thousand people felt so much like there were only fifty people here because roughly that many made up the core of almost every major event

you'd be posting about breakfast and then "DID YOU HEAR WHAT X-AND-SUCH-GUY DID???" and unfortunately: yes
was I supposed to just find out on my own that a new Step Rockets single dropped all the way back in August?
Reposted by Cory "lives in the mountains" W
I can always count on the gays to thirst follow anyone even if they’re a MAGAT
Reposted by Cory "lives in the mountains" W
We used to live in a proper society
it's a few days of driving but the van has a very cozy bed in the back we can share to stay warm on the way back up the mountain

(hmm I suppose we could just take the van into the woods)
not only are you invited I'll come pick you up if you want! :P
sorry I'm the worst at both chat and replying!
what if I would like your intentions to be very very impure? :P
absolute worst part about this is that it's almost certainly the actual root cause is because the shirts are just being sold everywhere as cheap merch for people who want to pretend they're not full maga (and/or don't believe anything)
surely these cannot be the children who are our future that Whitney Houston was singing about
After getting my T400 I also got an X24 and used it for purely writing for a hot moment, I think that ran XP+2007 basically fine.

I have an X31 around here somewhere that, against all good judgement, I put 7+2010 on and that actually ran fine enough
oh yeah, there's a band of a decade or so where thinkpad keyboards were Really Really Good

the 760s were pretty okay, I found them comparable to like some same-era Mac/Dell/Toshiba keyboards then most of those fell off and like 2001-2011 thinkpad keyboards were among the best you could get
(On the Mac side, Office 98 is "pretty bad" on most low-end, 601/603 hardware, and won't run at all on 68k, but gets better as you get to and cross over like 100MHz, so I could see the same being true on the Windows side)
Hmm, now I'm trying to remember what the slowest Pentium I've used is

I had a couple 760 variants but I don't remember if I bothered with Office 97 on those. I had an optiplex w/ PMMX@200 and NT4+Office97 was prob p decent on it

I have an OmniBook 800CT but idk if it has a working Office install
Oh yeah I imagine it would be pretty bad and Office 4.x would probably be significantly better, since that's more contemporary to 386es

(I dont' even know if 97 will officially run on 386es even though it will run on NT3.51 and that runs on 386es, but I do think 97 may officially run on some 486es)
(so I was setting up a few machines to be servers and a few machines to be clients)

anyway now I want a swole 386 to run NT 3.51 on.
(in particular in the dream it was that this one specific version of HP-UX from like 1999 was alleged to be significantly more stable and functional than a version from like 2001-03 or whatever, for like again, wild dream phrasing, 64 different services)
as a child I had this 386 that I realized only when I was finally getting rid of it was a 40MHz one on a board that probably would've supported like 16-32mb of ram in the most perfectly generic AT minitower case and in retrospect it's like peak 1992 generic budget wintel
had an insane dream last night where I was setting up a testing lab for old server and networking software (to test a claim that a specific version was more stable than it's successor) and now I'm wondering what's the minimum viable/reasonable hardware configuration for windows NT 3.51 and Office 97
imagine having "utility poles" be your crashing out moment
going to bed late but for a different reason from everybody else, it sounds like.