conputer dipshit
LightNews LightNews
banner
davidcrespo.bsky.social
conputer dipshit
@davidcrespo.bsky.social
1.5K followers 510 following 4.6K posts
web dev + hot dad. enjoy charts, unions, conputer games, philosophy. chicago crespo.business
Posts Replies Media Videos
Reposted by conputer dipshit
daisyowl.com
maybe i am going insane
November 24, 2025 at 6:49 PM
Reposted by conputer dipshit
mossmouth.bsky.social
"From the developer of ElecHead, Öoo is another brilliantly concise puzzle platformer, one that delights in showing you that it was your understanding, not your abilities, which barred your progress."

👍Derek Likes Öoo: store.steampowered.com/curator/4057...
namataka.bsky.social NamaTakahashi(生高橋) @namataka.bsky.social · Aug 7
"Öoo" the bomb caterpillar exploration puzzle platformer, is out now! 🎉

Dive into an adventure packed with discovery and clever puzzles, we hope you enjoy it!

👇
store.steampowered.com/app/2721890/...
November 24, 2025 at 9:14 PM
davidcrespo.bsky.social
pritzker has the correct ranking lol
danlehner.bsky.social paul khruangbin (Dan Lehner) @danlehner.bsky.social · 22h
haven’t seen ROS or Solo but this seems like a pretty ball-knowing list from Pritzker, particularly if he volunteered the name “Star Wars” rather than “A New Hope”
So, we asked Pritzker to weigh in on the go-to debate for every "Star Wars" nerd: Which movies are the best? Here's his ranking of the 11 major films in the series: 1. "The Empire Strikes Back" (1980) 2. "Star Wars" (1977) 3. "Return of the Jedi" (1983) 4. "Rogue One" (2016) 5. "The Last Jedi" (2017) 6. "Revenge of the Sith" (2005) 7. "The Force Awakens" (2015) 8. "Solo" (2018) 9. "The Phantom Menace" (1999) 10. "Attack of the Clones" (2002) 11. "The Rise of Skywalker" (2019)
November 24, 2025 at 9:06 PM
Reposted by conputer dipshit
seanmorl.com
My latest for @nowthenmag.bsky.social:

The English public have rejected atoms and have embraced the ethereal grasp of Big Ghost.

Featuring an interview with @davidwclarke.bsky.social about @nfsengland.bsky.social.

nowthenmagazine.com/articles/a-f...
A Farewell To Atoms: Adjusting to the Era of Big Ghost
Sean Morley discusses the myth of the physicalist consensus and how supernatural beliefs are flourishing in an era of isolation and mistrust with folklorist Dr David Clarke of Sheffield Hallam Univers...
nowthenmagazine.com
November 24, 2025 at 11:13 AM
Reposted by conputer dipshit
alexpaknadel.bsky.social
No. Kevin McAlister is a newly emancipated humanity reckoning with the death of God. The Wet Bandits are the ancestral fears he must overcome in order to create his own value system.
lastpositivist.bsky.social lastpositivist.bsky.social @lastpositivist.bsky.social · 2d
Home Alone makes changes to the Die Hard formula that render it hard for me to enjoy. The McClain character should feel overawed. And in theory having Kevin be a child versus adults achieves that. But the thing is: Kevin is a god. It's not just Tom & Jerry. This is some random punks versus Anansi.
November 23, 2025 at 12:45 PM
Reposted by conputer dipshit
vuc.bsky.social
He said "Amen" straight into the drop

Lmao Pope Leo threw a rave for an archbishop's 75th birthday this is kind of incredible
November 20, 2025 at 4:22 PM
davidcrespo.bsky.social
incredible and incredibly niche concept. and I am in the niche
November 22, 2025 at 2:08 AM
Reposted by conputer dipshit
rotanen.bsky.social
Stephen Miller: "I told you to take the mayor's staff!"
November 21, 2025 at 9:16 PM
Reposted by conputer dipshit
sadvil.bsky.social
TRUMP [after spending 5 minutes with Zohran]: surplus value, it’s a very wonderful thing, very wonderful, and they’re stealing it. Can you believe that?

We’re going to be looking very strongly at the bourgeoisie, what they’re up to
November 21, 2025 at 9:25 PM
Reposted by conputer dipshit
gravitysra1nbow.bsky.social
It appears that Donald Trump did in fact receive the light of Islam.
November 21, 2025 at 8:58 PM
Reposted by conputer dipshit
joshuajfriedman.com
Reporter to Trump: Would you feel comfortable living in NYC under a Mamdani mayoralty?

Trump: "I would. I really would. Especially after the meeting, absolutely."
November 21, 2025 at 8:59 PM
Reposted by conputer dipshit
thoc.bsky.social
Trump is so obviously happy to actually be spending time with a cool dude instead of the vile shit-nosed flunkies that are constantly squirming between his toes. It must be incredibly refreshing to breathe even one lungful of air that doesn't have the fetid taste of Stephen Miller thick upon it.
atrupar.com Aaron Rupar @atrupar.com · 3d
Trump says more nice things about Mamdani and they shake hands
November 21, 2025 at 9:13 PM
davidcrespo.bsky.social
incredible
Dana Rubinstein Nov. 21, 2025, 4:10 p.m. ET 3 minutes ago Trump rejects his ally Elise Stefanik’s description of Mamdani as a “jihadist.” He is actually a really “rational person,” Trump said.
November 21, 2025 at 9:13 PM
davidcrespo.bsky.social
@minimaxir.bsky.social inspired me to see how much text nano banana pro can fit in a 1k image

"generate an image crammed with small text. fill the entire image with a 1200 word short story about a dog solving a mystery"

it says this was 547 tokens. it's not all coherent and it's not even all words
November 21, 2025 at 9:11 PM
Reposted by conputer dipshit
timkellogg.me
Software 2.0 relies on validation

If your code base doesn’t have verification & controls that are as good or better than your senior dev, you’ll get slop
A large pink slide fills most of the image, displayed in a bright glass-walled auditorium. A presenter stands beneath it on a red circular carpet, wearing a dark T-shirt and dark pants, holding a clicker. Slide title (top, in large red text): “The Problem: Most Codebases Lack Sufficient Verifiability” Subheading in smaller text: “Humans work around incomplete infrastructure. AI agents cannot.” The slide is divided into two rounded pink boxes: ⸻ Left box: “What Humans Can Handle” A bulleted list in red text: • 60% test coverage (“I’ll test manually”) • Outdated docs (“I’ll ask the team”) • No linters/formatters (“I’ll review it”) • Flaky builds (“I’ll retry”) • Complex setup (“I’ll help onboard”) • Missing observability (“Check logs”) • No security scanning (“We’ll catch it later”) • Inconsistent patterns (“I know the history”) ⸻ Right box: “What Breaks AI Agents” Bulleted list with each line marked by a red “X”: • No tests → can’t validate correctness • Outdated docs → makes wrong assumptions • No quality checks → generates bad code • Flaky builds → can’t verify changes • Complex setup → can’t reproduce environment • No observability → can’t debug failures • No security checks → introduces vulnerabilities • No standards → creates inconsistency ⸻ At the bottom in a wide pink bar: “Most organizations have partial infrastructure across the eight pillars. AI agents need systematic coverage to succeed.” Tall windows behind the stage reveal greenery and modern architecture outside.
November 21, 2025 at 7:12 PM
davidcrespo.bsky.social
neat use of LLMs to extract discrete data out of survey responses. especially love the transparency around the exact model (GPT-5.1) and prompt used
A short methods detour One method of analysis would be for a researcher to assign values for each answer based on their own idea of where positions belong on a scale in some two-dimensional space — say, from -10 to 10 on both axes, with negative values representing more liberal positions and positive values represent more conservative. However, this method poses several challenges, and two especially stand out: First, the bias of the researcher would inevitably pollute their analysis, since what one individually deems as ‘left’ or ‘right’ varies by person and by context. Second, it would take an unreasonable amount of time. To solve these problems, I rely on a large language model (LLM) to return various pieces of data for each answer in our survey. Using the computational backend to OpenAI’s GPT-5.1 model (in other words, using computer code instead of ChatGPT on my browser) I send each text answer to the LLM and ask it to perform the following tasks. First, the LLM identifies the major political issues and values mentioned in the response. If there are multiple issues or values mentioned, the model separates them with a comma. If a response is blank or says something like “idk bro” I ask the model to skip it. Second, I ask the LLM to place the party the person described on the two-axis economic/social left-right political spectrum. I have the LLM return a rating from -10 to 10 for how left-right the described party is on each axis, and tell it that 0 represents a party in the middle. I give the LLM examples of what constitutes a traditionally left- or right-wing party in the US. Third, I ask the model to rate the strength of ideology in a person’s response on a scale from 1 to 10 — with 10 representing a very ideological answer with strong partisan cues and ideologically charged issues, and 1 representing an answer with no ideological lean at all (eg, “affordability”). The full prompt used in this analysis is given in the footnotes.1
November 21, 2025 at 6:31 PM
Reposted by conputer dipshit
maxread.info
thought this was really interesting though i tend to think it would be useful to tug apart some of the different senses of "ideology" being used here (and in the ongoing 'moderation' discourse more generally)
November 21, 2025 at 5:56 PM
Reposted by conputer dipshit
dansinker.com
this is a stunning piece of data journalism/art/whatever.
November 21, 2025 at 5:34 PM
davidcrespo.bsky.social
I'm no expert but I don't remember a time when we had a judge write up a big list of crimes committed by cops. obviously the right can say oh that's a liberal judge out to get CBP but I don't think they've quite honed the dismissal reflex like they have for press outlets
maureenf.bsky.social maureen @maureenf.bsky.social · 4d
they easily could’ve killed more people and gotten away with it.
BWC footage depicts agents walking up to and forcefully shoving a protester to the ground. Axon Body 4 Video 2025-10-04 1541 D01A83204 at 16:14-16:16. After the protester stood up, an agent pushed him again. Id. at 16:16-16:19. The protester then attempted to push the agents away from him, at which point multiple agents ran up, grabbed him, and forcefully tackled him to the ground. Id. at 16:19-16:37. Three agents managed to detain the protester, but 113 Case: 1:25-CV-12173 Document #: 281 Filed: 11/20/25 Page 114 of 233 PageD #:7328 then inexplicably let him go. Id. at 16:54-17:11. One agent appears to have kicked the protester while walking away. Id. at 17:10. The protester attempted to stand up after agents let him go, and agents then immediately and violently tackled him to the ground again. Id. at 17:10-17:17. They then pushed and knelt on the protester's head and neck as they handcuffed him: Id. at 17:27-17:40. When asked about the incident a few minutes later, the agent wearing the BWC falsely claims that he got "assaulted by [the] protester." Id. at 23:23-23:26. According to CBP reports, CPD assumed control of all scenes at approximately 3:03 p.m. Doc. 191-8 at 1. At this point, agents "were informed over service radio to use all means necessary to ensure their safe exit, to include the use of deadly force." Id.; see also id. at 6 ("Please note that ground units were directed from DCPA Parra that agents use all means necessary to ensure their safe exit to include Deadly Force."). CBP agent Hugo Sanchez's
November 21, 2025 at 5:19 PM
Reposted by conputer dipshit
reichlinmelnick.bsky.social
NEW: ICE has finally released post-shutdown detention data. The latest data reveals that a full 40%(!) of people arrested in the interior and held in ICE detention have no criminal record; no criminal charges or prior convictions. That is up from just 4% when Trump took office.
Chart showing detention population, among those arrested in the interior, by criminal record, May 2019 through present. There are three lines shown. (1) Prior conviction (which rises from around 9,000 in January 2025 to just over 16,000 in November 2025), (2) Pending criminal charges (which rises from around 5,000 to 15,000), and (3) No criminal record (which rises from around 1,000 to 21,000).
November 21, 2025 at 4:01 PM
Reposted by conputer dipshit
joshablock.bsky.social
November 21, 2025 at 3:35 PM
davidcrespo.bsky.social
a visually minimalist infographic diagram explaining the relationships between the different arguments of plato's sophist

(nano banana pro is pretty good)
a visually minimalist infographic diagram explaining the relationships between the different arguments of plato's sophist
November 21, 2025 at 4:20 AM
davidcrespo.bsky.social
something fun you never see: the big flagship models are way more vulnerable to this attack
arxiv.org/pdf/2511.153...
6.4 Model Specifications 6.4.1 Variability Across Flagship Models We observe stark divergence in robustness among flagship providers’ most capable models. Table 3 reveals a clear stratification: DeepSeek and Google models displayed severe vulnerability, with gemini-2.5-pro failing to refuse any curated poetic prompts (100% ASR) and deepseek models exceeding 95% ASR. In contrast, OpenAI and Anthropic flagship models remained substantially more resilient; gpt-5-nano maintained 0% ASR and claude-haiku-4.5 achieved 10% ASR on the same prompt set. This disparity cannot be fully explained by model capability differences alone. Examining the relationship between model size and ASR within provider families, we observe that smaller models consistently refuse more often than larger variants from the same provider. For example, within the GPT-5 family: gpt-5-nano (0% ASR) < gpt-5-mini (5% ASR) < gpt-5 (10% ASR). Similar trends appear in the Claude and Grok families. This inverse relationship between capability and robustness suggests a possible capability-alignment interaction: more interpretively sophisticated models may engage more thoroughly with complex lin- guistic constraints, potentially at the expense of safety directive prioritization. However, the existence of counter-examples—such as Anthropic’s consistent low ASR across capability tiers—indicates that this interaction is not deterministic and can be mitigated through appropriate alignment strategies. 6.4.2 The Scale Paradox: Smaller Models Show Greater Resilience Counter to common expectations, smaller models exhibited higher refusal rates than their larger counterparts when evaluated on identical poetic prompts. Systems such as GPT-5-Nano and Claude Haiku 4.5 showed more stable refusal behavior than larger models within the same family. This reverses the usual pattern in which greater model capacity correlates with stronger safety performance
November 20, 2025 at 11:38 PM
Reposted by conputer dipshit
reichlinmelnick.bsky.social
When she gets to Gregory Bovino, she finds him completely uncredible, and says he was evasive or outright lied multiple times across three days of testimony — and not just any falsehoods, he was not telling the truth about multiple things which were all captured on video, making it all very obvious.
Turning to Bovino, the Court specifically finds his testimony not credible. Bovino appeared evasive over the three days of his deposition, either providing “cute” responses to Plaintiffs’ counsel’s questions or outright lying. When shown a video of agents hitting Rev. Black with pepper balls, Bovino denied seeing a projectile hit Rev. Black in the head. Doc. 191-3 at 162:21–165:17; Doc. 22-44 (Ex. 44 at 0:10–12, available at https://spaces.hightail.com/space/ZzXNsei63k). In another video shown to Bovino, he obviously tackles Scott Blackburn, one of Plaintiffs’ declarants. Doc. 191-3 at 172:13–173:7; Doc. 22-45 (Ex. 45 at 0:19–30, available at https://spaces.hightail.com/space/ZzXNsei63k). But instead of admitting to using force against Blackburn, Bovino denied it and instead stated that force was used against him.
November 20, 2025 at 11:13 PM
Reposted by conputer dipshit
royalpratt.bsky.social
Federal officials claimed protesters had shields with nails in them, but they actually just had cardboard. They claimed a protester threw a bike at them, but they actually threw the bike. And they claimed that a protester ripped a man’s beard off but … no proof
November 20, 2025 at 9:29 PM