eilidh
@eilidh.bsky.social
840 followers 600 following 180 posts
everything for everyone, all at once / well adjusted dilettante, occasional writer, housing/climate organiser/ views my own, duh!
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by eilidh
jkass99.bsky.social
Because when you burn down a house and nobody ever rebuilds it, someone is still forced to live in the ashes
eilidh.bsky.social
does anyone remember that young communist league article from a few years back which lambasted the left about not not looking “normal”
jonnymorris.bsky.social
Is this real or am I in a coma?
Young Conservative with a Doctor Who question mark pullover.
eilidh.bsky.social
this was a subtweet to the person i was sat next to on the train 🤗
eilidh.bsky.social
i don’t doubt AI has some wonderful uses but if you’re using AI to write the most basic emails you need to get a grip
eilidh.bsky.social
you need to try them
eilidh.bsky.social
digital social cleansing - but i guess influencers would call that aesthetic
seeemilyplay.bsky.social
okay you’ve got to admit: edinburgh influencers using ai to literally erase the people of edinburgh is so spectacularly on the nose
eilidh.bsky.social
reddit reviews of taylor’s new album are great
Reposted by eilidh
owenjones.bsky.social
Apparently Israel’s genocidal acts are just “daft”.
Reposted by eilidh
scotnational.bsky.social
NEW: Rent controls are set to be introduced in Scotland after the Government’s housing reform legislation passed at Holyrood
'Important step forwards' as Housing Bill passes with plan for rent controls
www.thenational.scot
eilidh.bsky.social
looking forward to sleeping properly for the first time in years :-) rent controls also lower cortisol :-)
eilidh.bsky.social
anyway bill passed! scotland has rent controls! onwards comrades
eilidh.bsky.social
watching the rent control vote by myself in a hotel at labour conference which is just such a depressing and also comically evil end to years of organising for this moment lmao
eilidh.bsky.social
watching the rent control vote by myself in a hotel at labour conference which is just such a depressing and also comically evil end to years of organising for this moment lmao
eilidh.bsky.social
i just want to know how she got the heart into the wedding cake
Reposted by eilidh
eilidh.bsky.social
i may be dumb but i ain’t stupid
eilidh.bsky.social
i’m not losing another fiver to the your party wars. you have fun though
eilidh.bsky.social
from our final rally for rent controls last night. debate is today and the vote is tomorrow - then towards a future of permanent rent controls in scotland. up the might living rent 💚
Reposted by eilidh
lobstereo.bsky.social
also engenders a dangerous complacency where the mass civil society response that is required to actually push back on this stuff doesn‘t happen because people convince themselves “it won’t happen so why should they have to put their heads above water on it“
duncanweldon.bsky.social
Retrospectively removing indefinite leave to remain would be immoral and economically damaging. It would tear families apart.
Attacking it as ‘potentially illegal’ is completely beside the point.
Argue with the (awful) idea. Don’t try ’well, actually you can’t do that’.
Reposted by eilidh
nerdjpg.com
We are going to avoid worst case climate projections because of them…but at what cost?
The New York Times
What Will China's Green-Tech
Ambitions Cost the World?
3 days ago
eilidh.bsky.social
have two hot leads only works when they have chemistry!!
eilidh.bsky.social
big bold beautiful journey was terrible btw. farrell and robbie both being hot still doesn’t redeem it
eilidh.bsky.social
one of the fash kept showing a pic of a cross on their phone to me and kat so every time he did we’d would roll our eyes back and act like we were going through an exorcism lmao
Reposted by eilidh
davidallengreen.bsky.social
NEW

Has the government overreached in using terrorism law against Palestine Action?

A disclosed MI5 document indicates that the basis for proscription may be weak

By me, at @prospectmagazine.co.uk

www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/ideas/law/th...
The New York Times has now published a document which sets out the government’s basis for the proscription. This is the “open” version of the MI5 assessment that has been placed before the courts in litigation challenging the proscription. The judges would also see a “closed” version with material not to be placed in the public domain. 


One hopes the “closed” version is a far more impressive document than the one published, which is a flimsy and unconvincing piece of work. The assessment even admits—twice—that most of the activity of Palestine Action cannot be called terrorism.  

The document overall reads as if it has been compiled backwards, intending to justify a conclusion that needed to be reached. If so, it will not be the first intelligence document to have been created in such a way.

The assessment relies on the group having caused “serious” property damage, which is the relevant statutory test. The problem here is that the spraying of paint and graffiti by the group does not meet the threshold of seriousness. 

The document also relies on “open source” estimates of the cost of damage which, if one looks at the cited sources, trace back to a claim which the police themselves put to arrested protesters in interview. As such there is a certain circularity: the state is relying on the state claiming the damage is serious.
eilidh.bsky.social
he is a campaigner not a leader!!!
Reposted by eilidh
magnets.bsky.social
your party changing its avatar to a black circle and doing a notes apology