BackgroundThe real-world efficacy of the P2X3 antagonist gefapixant, a new class of antitussive for refractory chronic cough, is not yet fully understood. This study aimed to evaluate the real-world usage and response to gefapixant in patients with refractory chronic cough.MethodsThis multicentre, retrospective study involved patients with refractory chronic cough who visited cough clinics and were prescribed gefapixant. Data collected included baseline demographics, cough characteristics, response to gefapixant, degree of taste disturbance (both assessed by cough specialists), and the course of cough after discontinuation, if applicable.ResultsA total of 272 cases were analysed. The population was predominantly middle-aged females, with most patients having asthmatic cough as a comorbidity, dry cough, and predominantly daytime cough. Half of the patients reported a response rate of at least 5 on a 0 to 10 scale, with 25% reporting a response rate of ≥8. Among responders (response rate≥5), improvement was largely seen within 2 weeks. The median treatment duration with gefapixant was 32 days (interquartile range: 14–175), with longer treatment periods observed in responders. Responders typically had more severe pretreatment cough, dry cough, asthmatic cough as a comorbidity, and specific laryngeal sensations. In patients who discontinued gefapixant, sustained improvement was observed in responders. Taste disturbance was not associated with response to gefapixant and was less frequent in patients with cough triggers like smoke, dry air, or scents than in those without these triggers.ConclusionsGefapixant demonstrated a rapid and effective antitussive effect in this multicentre, real-world study.

Patients with unexplained chronic cough (UCC) or refractory chronic cough (RCC) experience significantly impaired quality of life, with negative influences on physical and psychological health and a h...

These guidelines incorporate the recent advances in chronic cough pathophysiology, diagnosis and treatment. The concept of cough hypersensitivity has allowed an umbrella term that explains the exquisite sensitivity of patients to external stimuli such a cold air, perfumes, smoke and bleach. Thus, adults with chronic cough now have a firm physical explanation for their symptoms based on vagal afferent hypersensitivity. Different treatable traits exist with cough variant asthma (CVA)/eosinophilic bronchitis responding to anti-inflammatory treatment and non-acid reflux being treated with promotility agents rather the anti-acid drugs. An alternative antitussive strategy is to reduce hypersensitivity by neuromodulation. Low-dose morphine is highly effective in a subset of patients with cough resistant to other treatments. Gabapentin and pregabalin are also advocated, but in clinical experience they are limited by adverse events. Perhaps the most promising future developments in pharmacotherapy are drugs which tackle neuronal hypersensitivity by blocking excitability of afferent nerves by inhibiting targets such as the ATP receptor (P2X3). Finally, cough suppression therapy when performed by competent practitioners can be highly effective. Children are not small adults and a pursuit of an underlying cause for cough is advocated. Thus, in toddlers, inhalation of a foreign body is common. Persistent bacterial bronchitis is a common and previously unrecognised cause of wet cough in children. Antibiotics (drug, dose and duration need to be determined) can be curative. A paediatric-specific algorithm should be used.

ALT: a man in scrubs is eating a piece of food while sitting in a hospital bed .