Nina Markl 🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈
@ninamarkl.bsky.social
3.4K followers 1.2K following 4.9K posts
perennial killjoy, academic & aspiring poster | language, computers & power and bikes & cats | she/they | 🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍⚧️ | based in the uk |views (and errors) mine, for more of those see: https://languagemechanics.neocities.org/
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
ninamarkl.bsky.social
i've written a blog post about why I think we should reject generative AI in the university: languagemechanics.neocities.org/no-gen-ai
ninamarkl.bsky.social
we open the season with strade bianche, we close it with il lombardia, we should acknowledge that the giro is the most important grand tour
ninamarkl.bsky.social
the vibes, the landscape, the fans, the weather, the little towns they ride through
ninamarkl.bsky.social
catching up on il lombardia, and my god, italian bike racing really is the best bike racing there is, huh
Reposted by Nina Markl 🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈
cambup-linguistics.cambridge.org
Cambridge University Press and the @lingsocam.bsky.social are proud to announce the new Journal of Black Language and Culture (JBLAC), launching in 2027. JBLAC fosters a transdisciplinary conversation through a global, diasporic lens.

📢 Learn more: cup.org/3KA2i9a

#linguistics #LangSky
coming soon in Language and Linguistics
ninamarkl.bsky.social
if i had a car, driving around with a wee ladder and a cable cutter to get them all off would be my new hobby
ninamarkl.bsky.social
i also might buy some reflective paint to de-vandalise the zebra crossings
ninamarkl.bsky.social
aside from looking, you know, fascist, it also looks very pathetic if you can’t even put your flag on a real flagpole
ninamarkl.bsky.social
first long bike ride through the english countryside in a while today. i think i need to get some kind of retractable tree cutting tool to pull all the flags off the lamposts
Reposted by Nina Markl 🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈
christianilbury.bsky.social
Please share!

We have a number of fully funded PhD studentships in "Designing Responsible Natural Language Processing". I'm a possible supervisor & I'd be keen to support projects on sociolinguistics-AI, e.g., accent bias in AI, language+gender/sexuality+AI.

www.responsiblenlp.org
Our CDT is based in the Edinburgh Futures Institute – the University of Edinburgh’s brand new hub for research, innovation and teaching focused on socially just artificial intelligence and data.
www.responsiblenlp.org
ninamarkl.bsky.social
but yes, I agree. I think this is where what is possible with automation in theory (lots of leisure time, cheaper products etc) clashes with the reality (lower pay, more precarity)
ninamarkl.bsky.social
yes, I think that's true. I guess what I'm thinking about is a) what does happen to the workers who can't easily move from the "automatable" finite work, to the "infinite" work? and b) what if some of this creative work is also automatable (to the standard the employer wants it to be)?
ninamarkl.bsky.social
true. but: is there an infinite amount of labour that someone is willing to pay for?
ninamarkl.bsky.social
you don't have to think that LLMs and other machine learning systems are bad or useless or inadequate in any and all circumstances to have some sense of self-presevation if they could drastically devalue your own labour, you know
ninamarkl.bsky.social
hate to keep posting about this, but it is absolutely WILD to me how many adult humans beings with professional careers fail to see how the "productivity hacks" of doing their very complex work "faster" through automation will eventually bite them
ninamarkl.bsky.social
i'm sorry, concretely, if you do the work that currently takes you, say 35 hours, in say 15 hours -- what do you think will change? don't you think the remaining 20 hours will be filled with new work? do you think there's unlimited work to be done so that no employee has to go?
ninamarkl.bsky.social
there's probably a fascinating sociological and psychological phenomenon behind this where people genuinely think that they are "safe" as long as they are "in charge" of technological change
ninamarkl.bsky.social
hate to keep posting about this, but it is absolutely WILD to me how many adult humans beings with professional careers fail to see how the "productivity hacks" of doing their very complex work "faster" through automation will eventually bite them
ninamarkl.bsky.social
really sells the radicalisation (solidarity)
ninamarkl.bsky.social
the question of what futures, possibilities, politics, relations etc language technologies foreclose is one i’ve found really useful to consider
ninamarkl.bsky.social
“What happens to political questions and speech when language is subsumed back into the form of the prompt? Will it be possible to produce effects with language that are not already foreclosed by the rationalities of the AI model?”

excellent (terrifying) paper by @amoorelouise.bsky.social et al!
sj-bennett.bsky.social
I think this is a super interesting topic too! Sort of related - I worked on this paper w some colleagues and we were also thinking about some of the issues you raise! would be interested to dive more into how people engage with prompting/narratives of prompting
www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....
Politics of the prompt: Government in the age of generative AI
This paper addresses the politics of the technique of prompting in machine learning, at a time when bureaucratic and democratic government is undergoing transformation. Drawing on the case of the U...
www.tandfonline.com
ninamarkl.bsky.social
absolutely fascinating work, lots of thoughts! if you’re interested in thinking more about prompts we could have a (virtual ☹️) coffee sometime to chat?