Given the number of times you've resorted to derogatory attacks I believe you were lying when you said this. Even if you didn't use those specific insults, you clearly have a problem that extends well beyond merely changing a platform.
I never called her that, personally. I also never personally used the “Genocide Joe” label, despite mostly agreeing with it. I only ever wanted her to change her stance. I mostly liked her VP pick in Walz, and I am eager for the first female president. I just want one with better morals.
All people are equal with none "worth" more than the other. Your question isn't the clever gotcha that you seem to think it is.
That said, my stance remains that threatening vulnerable people's lives & rights is coercion and 100% morally wrong. Worse when only for self-serving ideological purity.
I really believe that leftists would do well to consider the long term ramifications of their actions. Learn to build winning coalitions. Prop up good leaders like AOC & Mamdani without tearing down your own power.
Divisive BS that depresses the vote will never be a winning strategy.
Uncommitted fought over Harris's PLATFORM when the real battle was for the Whitehouse and the ability to sway policy to actually help vulnerable people.
You campaigned against your own power to help anyone! You lost all leverage & power when Trump won!
Uncommitted effectively campaigned to elect Trump and ensure the worst possible outcome for all people. The Palestinian genocide will be total and now there is a genocide against immigrants and LGBTQ here too.
Do you realize that you do your causes no favors by spreading lies?
I have personally benefited from Obamacare and will be hurt by Republican policy. I know you are lying. The lie is demonstrably false to millions of others who will also lose their healthcare in 6 weeks.
So your point is that an imperfect solution that extended healthcare to 40 million people is exactly the same as a taking healthcare away from 40 million people?
