the restaurant was playing "Golden" from Kpop Demon Hunters as we were finishing lunch so I started telling my wife about this meme (see alt text for context), and about five minutes later as I was finishing my explanation a white lady drives by blasting... "Golden" from Kpop Demon Hunters
December 7, 2025 at 2:16 AM
the restaurant was playing "Golden" from Kpop Demon Hunters as we were finishing lunch so I started telling my wife about this meme (see alt text for context), and about five minutes later as I was finishing my explanation a white lady drives by blasting... "Golden" from Kpop Demon Hunters
Logged onto the depression machine & now I'm depressed, fancy that
December 5, 2025 at 7:27 PM
Logged onto the depression machine & now I'm depressed, fancy that
what are you people even tweeting about
December 5, 2025 at 6:32 PM
what are you people even tweeting about
That man's name? Father Paul Duré
Cloudflare is just one guy holding two cables together. The entire internet runs through them. He is being electrocuted 24/7 but holds on because he knows people need the world wide web. When he passes out from pain & exhaustion we get 404 errors
December 5, 2025 at 2:41 PM
That man's name? Father Paul Duré
I should get into the Bay Area luxury rehab center market
December 4, 2025 at 3:29 PM
I should get into the Bay Area luxury rehab center market
Underrated part of having cats is how they completely forget you exist once you light the fireplace
December 4, 2025 at 1:21 AM
Underrated part of having cats is how they completely forget you exist once you light the fireplace
Eny Cabreja baseball card, iykyk
What is the most "obscure" piece of sports memorabilia that you own? Why do you have it?
December 4, 2025 at 12:32 AM
Eny Cabreja baseball card, iykyk
My version of this is that "stronger together" is the perfect distillation of the American democratic ideal and we wasted it on the goddamn 2016 Clinton campaign
It sucks that American Canto could be a cool title for something else
December 3, 2025 at 11:08 PM
My version of this is that "stronger together" is the perfect distillation of the American democratic ideal and we wasted it on the goddamn 2016 Clinton campaign
if going to h-mart is wrong I don't want to be right
saw the term "wypipo" in the wild and discourse by harvard-educated people about whether white people are allowed to go to h-mart and i have never been so relieved to see something which annoys me so much
December 3, 2025 at 4:27 PM
if going to h-mart is wrong I don't want to be right
falklands discourse? are you fucking kidding me?
December 2, 2025 at 9:14 PM
falklands discourse? are you fucking kidding me?
Here at OpenAI, we're totally revolutionizing the way dipshits write demand letters to companies they think owe them money
December 2, 2025 at 6:50 PM
Here at OpenAI, we're totally revolutionizing the way dipshits write demand letters to companies they think owe them money
It's extremely important to hold the line on this stuff and let yourself look like a human. I hate hate *hate* what the apps are doing to beauty standards, m&f alike. Don't get hair plugs. Don't get botox. Don't even whiten your teeth. Every little concession moves the standard the wrong direction
it is incredible that after hundreds of years of body dysmorphia, it took me less than four years of incel / PUA media for men to catch up
December 1, 2025 at 3:24 PM
It's extremely important to hold the line on this stuff and let yourself look like a human. I hate hate *hate* what the apps are doing to beauty standards, m&f alike. Don't get hair plugs. Don't get botox. Don't even whiten your teeth. Every little concession moves the standard the wrong direction
Reposted by pete
status symbol? my status symbol is comfortable financial security
November 27, 2025 at 7:52 PM
status symbol? my status symbol is comfortable financial security
I regret to announce that I watched Fantastic Four: First Steps
November 27, 2025 at 2:45 PM
I regret to announce that I watched Fantastic Four: First Steps
This is true and also the strikeout paradox drives me nuts, not mathematically or anything, it just seems cosmically unfair
Teams just pay for Ks. It’s the most predictable, reliable way to prevent runs and being able to miss bats with spin is something that ages better than nearly anything else—velo can wane but wicked break can last forever.
November 27, 2025 at 1:20 AM
This is true and also the strikeout paradox drives me nuts, not mathematically or anything, it just seems cosmically unfair
This is not a comment on Katz, about whom I know nothing, but this makes three additions to the MLB coaching staff who were fired by other orgs in 2025
The Astros are hiring former Chicago White Sox pitching coach Ethan Katz as a pitching coach on their staff, source tells @theathletic.com. Katz will replace Bill Murphy, who left for the Pittsburgh Pirates last month.
November 26, 2025 at 6:48 PM
This is not a comment on Katz, about whom I know nothing, but this makes three additions to the MLB coaching staff who were fired by other orgs in 2025
There's a house in my neighborhood with a security system that yells "HI, YOU ARE ON CAMERA" to anyone walking past on the sidewalk, and I truly think building a 20-foot concrete wall would be less antisocial
November 25, 2025 at 8:52 PM
There's a house in my neighborhood with a security system that yells "HI, YOU ARE ON CAMERA" to anyone walking past on the sidewalk, and I truly think building a 20-foot concrete wall would be less antisocial
This is the funniest reaction to the Trump-Mamdani meeting. RWers were mad about the optics, lefties were cackling at the optics. Meanwhile everyone gets that Trump just loves being flattered and the bromance won't last more than three hours. But Grim, the dunce, actually took it seriously lmao
November 24, 2025 at 10:08 PM
This is the funniest reaction to the Trump-Mamdani meeting. RWers were mad about the optics, lefties were cackling at the optics. Meanwhile everyone gets that Trump just loves being flattered and the bromance won't last more than three hours. But Grim, the dunce, actually took it seriously lmao
[sanitizing bottles] if I leave even a single germ on this my baby will die
[watching baby lick a tape measure that's been in the garage for a decade or two] building immunity is honestly so important
[watching baby lick a tape measure that's been in the garage for a decade or two] building immunity is honestly so important
November 24, 2025 at 7:33 PM
[sanitizing bottles] if I leave even a single germ on this my baby will die
[watching baby lick a tape measure that's been in the garage for a decade or two] building immunity is honestly so important
[watching baby lick a tape measure that's been in the garage for a decade or two] building immunity is honestly so important
I always felt liked this dynamic worked a different direction pre-Andor, showing how valuable ass-kickers like Leia and Han were to the Alliance after years of dithering wieners calling the shots
It's accidental, but, thanks to Andor, Mon Mothma's actions in Rogue One where she launches an autogolpe on Yavin IV and seizes power gain a lot of notes of "oh, I totally get now why Luthen wanted to shoot half of y'all."
November 24, 2025 at 4:42 PM
I always felt liked this dynamic worked a different direction pre-Andor, showing how valuable ass-kickers like Leia and Han were to the Alliance after years of dithering wieners calling the shots
Ok this is really embarrassing but I forgot when Skinner uses it later in the episode and he clearly means "of reasonably fair quality." I apologize and concede the argument entirely
I have an insane bone to pick. People use "cromulent" as if it's interchangeable with "acceptable" but I think its meaning is more particular than that. It's "acceptable" as in "permissible within a set of rules", not as in "of reasonably fair quality."
So this is not a cromulent use of "cromulent"
So this is not a cromulent use of "cromulent"
November 23, 2025 at 8:25 PM
Ok this is really embarrassing but I forgot when Skinner uses it later in the episode and he clearly means "of reasonably fair quality." I apologize and concede the argument entirely
Reposted by pete
people are reading "catch-and-kill" in the journalistic sense but she was probably just finding raccoons for him to eat
November 22, 2025 at 3:04 PM
people are reading "catch-and-kill" in the journalistic sense but she was probably just finding raccoons for him to eat
Reposted by pete
Trump immediately after meeting with Zohran Mamdani:
November 21, 2025 at 8:47 PM
Trump immediately after meeting with Zohran Mamdani:
Layman's guess here, based on these filings, is that she said something like "by indicting him, we're going to make him defend his egregious conduct, he's going to have to take the stand and show how he didn't lie under oath" or something. idk
Today's motion to dismiss includes a new hint about whatever it was (redacted so far in public filings) Halligan told the grand jury that seemed to imply Comey had no Fifth Amendment right not to testify or bear the burden to establish his own innocence.
![That is for good reason. As quoted in the sealed version of Judge Fitzpatrick’s order, Ms.
Halligan stated to the grand jury: [redacted]
ECF No. 192 at 15. Judge Fitzpatrick observed that Ms. Halligan
provided this statement in response to “challenging questions from grand jurors” and that it
suggested Mr. Comey does not have a Fifth Amendment right to refrain from testifying. Id. at](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:24vva42nxim6zbcmnozegoef/bafkreiagelmcvqdlh6wwuzlh4ybw7a2ycg2a5jwx5w6edhojdjufutgeoe@jpeg)
![15-16. Not only would that have been a fundamental misstatement of law, see Griffin, 380 U.S.
at 615, it would have significantly prejudiced Mr. Comey by allowing the grand jury to think the
government could shift the burden to Mr. Comey to prove his innocence, thereby resolving
doubts grand jurors had about the government’s case, ECF No. 192 at 15-16.
Ms. Halligan’s statement also embodied another fundamental misconception about the
government’s burden: The jury’s role is never to determine innocence—the only question is not
guilty or guilty, and the government must carry its burden of proof. Accordingly, her use of the
phrase further conveyed a skewed sense of the issues at stake in this case
and deepened the misconceptions she gave the grand jury about the respective burdens of the
government and Mr. Comey. See United States v. Mendoza-Acevedo, 950 F.2d 1, 4 (1st Cir.
1991) (“[W]ithin our criminal justice system, we think the difference between ‘not guilty’ and
‘innocent’ is more than semantics.” (citation omitted)).](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:24vva42nxim6zbcmnozegoef/bafkreifa36ob2blr6b3hsn6pmmtesg2qglr24pulnjcbcxjl2qe7w5oqfm@jpeg)
November 21, 2025 at 10:14 PM
Layman's guess here, based on these filings, is that she said something like "by indicting him, we're going to make him defend his egregious conduct, he's going to have to take the stand and show how he didn't lie under oath" or something. idk