Richard Heppner 🤷🏼‍♂️
banner
rlheppner.bsky.social
Richard Heppner 🤷🏼‍♂️
@rlheppner.bsky.social
Law Prof at Duquesne Kline Law (Civ Pro, Fed Courts) • Former Appellate Attorney • English PhD (Modernism) • Posts too infrequently to have a brand. • Overeducated, overtired, underwhelmed. • see also id. @ 🐘, 🧵 • he/him
Now this is a truly bonkers entry into the whole cake vs. pie fracas. Cheesecake is actually the worst cake. And I’m not afraid to say it.
I get a lot of hate for this view and in turn I'd only ask if you've ever had a pie as good as a typical cheesecake. The answer is no, you have not. Cheesecake invalidates the whole pie category. Hell, regular cake barely survives the cheesecake onslaught on the strength of carrot cake alone.
The dirty secret of pies is that they have the lowest ceiling potential of all sweets. Your best pie is merely fine. Your median pie is bad.
November 25, 2025 at 10:16 PM
Reposted by Richard Heppner 🤷🏼‍♂️
Today’s xkcd made me cry.

In a good way.

xkcd.com/3172/
November 24, 2025 at 11:46 PM
I’m enough of a fuddy-duddy to dislike this use of “turn-of-the-century.”
November 23, 2025 at 3:16 PM
Reposted by Richard Heppner 🤷🏼‍♂️
[Enter two other Senators with a Messenger.]

THIRD SENATOR
Thou hast painfully discover’d; are his files
As full as thy report?
November 14, 2025 at 2:52 PM
What perfect album came out the year I turned 16?

(I’m old.)
November 17, 2025 at 4:08 AM
Reposted by Richard Heppner 🤷🏼‍♂️
WE WON. I am *begging* you to take note of who did this. *Not* UCLA admin—they’re still scuttling around behind closed doors, attempting to appease—but FACULTY AND STAFF, led by AAUP.
BREAKING: In AAUP et al v. Trump (wall-to-wall union lawsuit challenging the administration’s unlawful use of TItle VI to reshape the University of California system), the faculty and staff of the UC system WON!!!

We were granted our preliminary injunction! @aaup.org
November 15, 2025 at 12:01 AM
Reposted by Richard Heppner 🤷🏼‍♂️
In the brief, Jane Manners argues that the history is clear: presidents don’t have unfettered authority to remove independent agency officials, such as FTC Commissioner Slaughter. Read: bit.ly/4nSvm9B
bit.ly
November 14, 2025 at 8:39 PM
Reposted by Richard Heppner 🤷🏼‍♂️
Message to all faculty: your expertise is no longer trusted or valued at this so-called “university.”
November 14, 2025 at 12:22 PM
Reposted by Richard Heppner 🤷🏼‍♂️
November 13, 2025 at 2:31 PM
Reposted by Richard Heppner 🤷🏼‍♂️
Reminds me of my favorite student response from a teaching evaluation form:

Q “What aspects of … Richard Heppner’s teaching could be changed to better support student learning?”
A “I don’t think Professor Heppner could teach this class better than he does.”
November 12, 2025 at 4:41 AM
Reposted by Richard Heppner 🤷🏼‍♂️
Would you ask a judge to declare a house haunted? What about suing a fortune-teller for mispredicting your future? Should the law even allow these claims?

If you write about law, believer or sceptic, you can contribute to our book on Supernatural Law: Regulating the Paranormal.
tinyurl.com/46jwmcnh
November 13, 2025 at 6:38 AM
Watching BlueSky dive into document review.
November 13, 2025 at 12:23 PM
Reposted by Richard Heppner 🤷🏼‍♂️
Isn’t that what Space Force does?
we need a department of kerning
November 13, 2025 at 3:26 AM
These people are all so self-important. I like NEVER use the “high importance” flag for emails. These are full of them.
genuinely very few things more satisfying than reading the kinds of emails rich and famous people send each other
November 13, 2025 at 3:59 AM
Isn’t that what Space Force does?
we need a department of kerning
November 13, 2025 at 3:26 AM
Doe anyone else dislike this news-y stylistic tic?

"John shot the victim, officials say."
"The economy is rebounding, some economists posit."

I feel like putting the "officials say" or "some economists posit" at the end deemphasizes it, and leaves the impression that the foregoing is true.
November 12, 2025 at 3:24 AM
Reposted by Richard Heppner 🤷🏼‍♂️
i don't think my television needs an AI Concierge
November 11, 2025 at 9:58 PM
No way this would ever be directly addressed by politics. What’ll happen is meat will just get more and more expensive, thanks either to climate- or regulatory-change.
i'm convinced if we ever tried to touch the rail of meat politics in America (something that's going to eventually need to happen in order to reduce CO2 emissions), it would lead to a huge right-wing shock
remembering the time a random catholic priest got mad at me about a hypothetical about the government restricting meat production on the other site

meat politics is going to be insane for the next Dem administration which takes climate change seriously, imo
November 11, 2025 at 3:44 AM
There's a current Mac ad that starts by zooming in on an onscreen cursor, while the voiceover says "Everything you love began as nothing, just a flicker on a screen, asking a simple question: what do you see?"

And I'm not sure if it's obtuse or is deliberately saying everything we love is digital.
November 10, 2025 at 7:02 PM
Reposted by Richard Heppner 🤷🏼‍♂️
BREAKING: We won!

Today the 3rd Circuit Court ordered the @post-gazette.com to restore our contract it illegally tore up 5 years ago. That’s our health care, PTO, right to a 40-hr. work week, short-term disability and so much more we’ve struck for 3+ years.

pghguild.com/2025/11/10/p...
November 10, 2025 at 5:48 PM
Sure. As everyone knows, it's a fake economy if the bottom is subsidized by the top, and it's a real economy if the top is subsidized by the bottom.
Comer: "This is a fake economy. You can't have 1/3 of America receiving some type of free government healthcare and then have another 1/3 that's getting a subsidized rate. That falls on the final 1/3 that's having to pay increased premiums."
November 10, 2025 at 5:54 PM
Reposted by Richard Heppner 🤷🏼‍♂️
For some reason, I just thought of this scene.
November 10, 2025 at 3:42 AM