If this is what it takes to break the MAGA mass psychosis, so be it.
If this is what it takes to break the MAGA mass psychosis, so be it.
NOT Bill Clinton after all. 🤷♀️
This is all getting curiouser & curiouser. 🤔
NOT Bill Clinton after all. 🤷♀️
This is all getting curiouser & curiouser. 🤔
The question is not did he have sex with underaged girls. He did.
The question is not did he have illegal financial transactions with Epstein. He did.
The question is not did he serve as an asset and agent of Putin. He did.
The question is not did he have sex with underaged girls. He did.
The question is not did he have illegal financial transactions with Epstein. He did.
The question is not did he serve as an asset and agent of Putin. He did.
Yes, you can read it here
www.npr.org/2019/08/22/7...
The more NYT apologists try to minimize this the clearer it becomes that they don't understand why much of the public doesn't trust legacy media.
The more NYT apologists try to minimize this the clearer it becomes that they don't understand why much of the public doesn't trust legacy media.
Wilson ousts Mayor Bruce Harrell after running as a progressive challenger.
Her win is a west coast companion to Mamdani’s as a statement victory for the left.
Wilson ousts Mayor Bruce Harrell after running as a progressive challenger.
Her win is a west coast companion to Mamdani’s as a statement victory for the left.
The Epstein files will be released in early December.
Donald Trump is a child rapist. He raped little girls. It's probably been filmed by Epstein, Israel, and the Russians.
He will burn the country to the ground to delay the inevitable.
The Epstein files will be released in early December.
Donald Trump is a child rapist. He raped little girls. It's probably been filmed by Epstein, Israel, and the Russians.
He will burn the country to the ground to delay the inevitable.
-By Ross Douthat
-By Ross Douthat
Believed it’d be improper, running counter to the goal of restoring public perception of impartiality? That’s the relatively least damning answer I can think of.
Believed it’d be improper, running counter to the goal of restoring public perception of impartiality? That’s the relatively least damning answer I can think of.