Arrest for reckless driving, home invasion. If they say they’re Feds let them say it to a judge. Make’em plead the supremacy clause in court!
Seeing tons of extremely generous offers. I'll try to post 'em all here--please add your own w topics you can cover & how to contact
Seeing tons of extremely generous offers. I'll try to post 'em all here--please add your own w topics you can cover & how to contact
They’re levying war on the United States. It’s defined as treason in the U.S. Constitution and interpreted by Chief Justice John Marshall, writing for the Supreme Court in 1807.
Thread below.
"We have a constitutional right to assemble here! You are committing treason!" protester screams amidst cloud of tear gas. LIVE NOW ⬇️
They’re levying war on the United States. It’s defined as treason in the U.S. Constitution and interpreted by Chief Justice John Marshall, writing for the Supreme Court in 1807.
Thread below.
Arrest for reckless driving, home invasion. If they say they’re Feds let them say it to a judge. Make’em plead the supremacy clause in court!
ACT!!!
ACT!!!
He’s levying war on the United States. It’s treason.
It's a campaign of collective punishment against the domestic political enemy. The widely documented climate of fear & total disruption of daily life in Minneapolis is this campaign succeeding
It's a campaign of collective punishment against the domestic political enemy. The widely documented climate of fear & total disruption of daily life in Minneapolis is this campaign succeeding
more from me + @leahfeiger.bsky.social
www.wired.com/story/califo...
Arrest for reckless driving, home invasion. If they say they’re Feds let them say it to a judge. Make’em plead the supremacy clause in court!
It is, to me, very unlikely that a state will simply choose not to hold elections.
It is also, to me, very likely that voter intimidation and suppression will increase beyond the current terrible method.
That doesn't mean there is no path. It just means that we need to reject the framing that the federal government has any legal authority to cease elections.
It is, to me, very unlikely that a state will simply choose not to hold elections.
It is also, to me, very likely that voter intimidation and suppression will increase beyond the current terrible method.