Sevoris (he/him)
@sevoris.bsky.social
480 followers 1.6K following 1.3K posts
Grad Student in Data Science and NLP. Design, philosophy, sociology, politics, making a better world with listening and networking. Also interested in speculative fiction writing and philosophy - letting reality write new things.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by Sevoris (he/him)
anthropunk.bsky.social
That is some HUBRIS. TechBros vs Mother Nature. This will accelerate the planet's temperature (bad); ruin the delicate biological ecosystem; and wreck every creature's Circadian Rhythms. All for what? The goal isn't to bring sunlight to darkness. The goal is MONEY. Bros gotta plunder.
Reposted by Sevoris (he/him)
ndhapple.bsky.social
MMWR was the early alert system that told doctors to be on the lookout for Gay-Related Immune Deficiency (and just about every other pandemic/epidemic since the 70s
sherylnyt.bsky.social
BREAKING: Friday night massacre underway at CDC. Doznes of "disease detectives," high-level scientists, entire Washington staff and editors of the MMWR (Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report) have all been RIFed and received the following notice:
Reposted by Sevoris (he/him)
mikerose.bsky.social
We banned a guy on the Steam forums for repeatedly saying there were “too many women” in our game

So he flipped his positive review to negative

Still totally worth it
Reposted by Sevoris (he/him)
alexmillerdb.bsky.social
Kuzu just folded/pivoted.
> Kuzu is working on something new! We will no longer be actively supporting KuzuDB.
is on kuzudb.com

Me thinking a startup has promising tech has so far been a kiss of death to the company. An "Inverse Alex's Tech Opinions" fund might be very profitable. 🤔
Reposted by Sevoris (he/him)
iansociologo.bsky.social
Beware of AI videos like the one below.

And, AI sucks for many reasons, but among the worst is that it destabilizes our shared reality.
jennbudd.bsky.social
Seems like they are going after reporters who are women. They hit one w/pepper spray ammo in her car, the WGN reporter and now this.
Reposted by Sevoris (he/him)
clancyny.bsky.social
@jennbudd.bsky.social

There is a claim that this video is fake and created by AI. This account's bio on TikTok reads:

"the program 🔌
(don't take stuff too serious)
enjoy the content 😎"

Do you have another source to verify the video? Or know anything about the location, IDs of individuals, etc.?
Reposted by Sevoris (he/him)
timnitgebru.bsky.social
The Daily show also interviewed "father" of effective altruism William MacAskill & promoted his book.

The billionaires gave him millions to promote his book so a PR person probably got him on the show.

All mainstream media shilling propaganda for the corporations claiming to build machine gods 🙄
weeklyshowpodcast.bsky.social
In this week’s new #TheWeeklyShow episode, Jon & Geoffrey Hinton discuss ⬇️:

>> AI 101
>> AI Threats & Regulation
>> Ping, Ping, Ping
>> Always Angry Trump & Pardons

NEW YouTube video out now.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=jrK3...
AI: What Could Go Wrong? with Geoffrey Hinton | The Weekly Show with Jon Stewart
YouTube video by The Weekly Show with Jon Stewart
www.youtube.com
sevoris.bsky.social
If you go "hey the synthetic text extrusion machine understands the topic better than you" to a woman academic, you‘re an utter creep and an intellectual void. Don‘t ever sink to that level.
sevoris.bsky.social
… I just found the part where he asserts the synthetic text extrusion machine is smarter than you.

That’s not edgy. That’s completely disgusting and missanthropic if not misogynistic. Urgh.
Reposted by Sevoris (he/him)
thisnorthernboy.bsky.social
Quick spaceship sketch. 'Spiteful Interceptor', built by Jeffery & Co.

#Spaceship #Illustration #SciFi
A digital illustration of a spaceship. Wedge-shaped, with a small cockpit right at the front. A section of the middle is cut away. Grey and red in colour.
Reposted by Sevoris (he/him)
thisnorthernboy.bsky.social
Not had time for #Shiptember really, but here's The Erebus, a Type 16 Clipper, built by Komatsu.

#Illustration #Spaceship
A long twin-hulled spaceship in orange, cream, and dark teal.
Reposted by Sevoris (he/him)
thisnorthernboy.bsky.social
A little more #Shiptember action. Here's The Vale, a Type 13 Skiff, built by Husqvarna.

#Illustration #Spaceship
A digital illustration of a spaceship. Vaguely crustacean in shape, with a central shell, and four pods/hulls attached by rods. Blue and orange in colour. #Shiptember
Reposted by Sevoris (he/him)
thisnorthernboy.bsky.social
Some more #Shiptember action. Here's The Foundry, a Fast Picket, built by Chalmer & Hoyer.

#Illustration #Spaceship
A digital illustration of a spaceship. Twin hulls join at a single large engine at the back, in front of which there's an enclosed spherical cockpit.

#Shiptember
sevoris.bsky.social
"Spacecraft? Steel!

"Power armor? Also steel!

"That skyscraper? Believe it or not, steel!

"Giant space habitat? Straight to steel."
docvivileandra.bsky.social
Every sci-fi author tries to come up with a material "more advanced" than steel, as if steel is a single material with a single set of properties and not, like, hundreds of different materials that we are still advancing and improving

The more advanced equivalent of steel is just better steel lol
Reposted by Sevoris (he/him)
honkhase.bsky.social
Wirtschaftsministerium: Reiche berät Reiche

"Bei Treffen mit der Stiftung Familienunternehmen gaben Ministerin Reiche und ihr Staatssekretär Tipps, wie die Superreichen-Lobby Steuersenkungen erreichen könne...."
#Machtmissbrauch #Korruption #CDU
fragdenstaat.de/artikel/exkl...
Wirtschaftsministerium: Reiche berät Reiche
Bei Treffen mit der Stiftung Familienunternehmen gaben Ministerin Reiche und ihr Staatssekretär Tipps, wie die Superreichen-Lobby Steuersenkungen erreichen könne. Das zeigen interne Unterlagen.
fragdenstaat.de
sevoris.bsky.social
"Your mission, should you choose to accept it-"
olivia.science
stop liking this, people LMAO
olivia.science
as a cognitive scientist, I can confirm we don't know how humans think
Reposted by Sevoris (he/him)
cuw.bsky.social
Printing press: repeatable process for mass reproduction of the same thing at scale, maybe killed the illuminated manuscript
AI: personalized liar that is not a reproduction of the source material nor is it reproducible, actually literally kills people with psychosis.
Did Gutenberg do K?
sevoris.bsky.social
Oh now that is a *very* interesting brainteaser!
Reposted by Sevoris (he/him)
impossiblephd.bsky.social
I know that one very well. My most recent conference presentation, in part, dealt with pseudoscientific hacks and anti-intellectual Gish galloping.

The transcript, if you're curious:

stainedglasswoman.substack.com/p/stained-gl...
Stained Glass Woman
Remixing Research as a Technical Writer-Advocate for Trans Liberation
stainedglasswoman.substack.com
Reposted by Sevoris (he/him)
impossiblephd.bsky.social
As a professor and a researcher:

Good god, the lack of understanding that this post reflects is stunning. Scholars do not *ever* get paid for our research, either to directly publish it or on a per-read basis. It's not uncommon to have to *pay* to get your work published.
sevoris.bsky.social
Is there a psychological study about the weird "I‘m going to try and insult your person by using the synthetic text extrusion machine" behavior? Or is that just "oh look at me I‘m doing the thing you dislike I‘m so edgy"?
Reposted by Sevoris (he/him)
olivia.science
please think about this deeply & consult with experts who do NOT have Conflicts of Interest! See:

Guest, O., Suarez, M., Müller, B., et al. (2025). Against the Uncritical Adoption of 'AI' Technologies in Academia. Zenodo. doi.org/10.5281/zeno...

bsky.app/profile/oliv...
olivia.science
Finally! 🤩 Our position piece: Against the Uncritical Adoption of 'AI' Technologies in Academia:
doi.org/10.5281/zeno...

We unpick the tech industry’s marketing, hype, & harm; and we argue for safeguarding higher education, critical
thinking, expertise, academic freedom, & scientific integrity.
1/n
Abstract: Under the banner of progress, products have been uncritically adopted or
even imposed on users — in past centuries with tobacco and combustion engines, and in
the 21st with social media. For these collective blunders, we now regret our involvement or
apathy as scientists, and society struggles to put the genie back in the bottle. Currently, we
are similarly entangled with artificial intelligence (AI) technology. For example, software updates are rolled out seamlessly and non-consensually, Microsoft Office is bundled with chatbots, and we, our students, and our employers have had no say, as it is not
considered a valid position to reject AI technologies in our teaching and research. This
is why in June 2025, we co-authored an Open Letter calling on our employers to reverse
and rethink their stance on uncritically adopting AI technologies. In this position piece,
we expound on why universities must take their role seriously toa) counter the technology
industry’s marketing, hype, and harm; and to b) safeguard higher education, critical
thinking, expertise, academic freedom, and scientific integrity. We include pointers to
relevant work to further inform our colleagues. Figure 1. A cartoon set theoretic view on various terms (see Table 1) used when discussing the superset AI
(black outline, hatched background): LLMs are in orange; ANNs are in magenta; generative models are
in blue; and finally, chatbots are in green. Where these intersect, the colours reflect that, e.g. generative adversarial network (GAN) and Boltzmann machine (BM) models are in the purple subset because they are
both generative and ANNs. In the case of proprietary closed source models, e.g. OpenAI’s ChatGPT and
Apple’s Siri, we cannot verify their implementation and so academics can only make educated guesses (cf.
Dingemanse 2025). Undefined terms used above: BERT (Devlin et al. 2019); AlexNet (Krizhevsky et al.
2017); A.L.I.C.E. (Wallace 2009); ELIZA (Weizenbaum 1966); Jabberwacky (Twist 2003); linear discriminant analysis (LDA); quadratic discriminant analysis (QDA). Table 1. Below some of the typical terminological disarray is untangled. Importantly, none of these terms
are orthogonal nor do they exclusively pick out the types of products we may wish to critique or proscribe. Protecting the Ecosystem of Human Knowledge: Five Principles
Reposted by Sevoris (he/him)
doctorvive.bsky.social
The attack on @frediotto.bsky.social was seeded years ago by Roger Pielke Jr, who started arguing that this table from a recent @ipcc.bsky.social report proved that climate science cannot attribute extreme weather to climate change.

But Roger is of course lying. And we know this for 2 reasons.

🧵
CLIMATEWIRE
Climate critics try to discredit IPCC author for linking
disasters to global warming
By LESLEY CLARK, SARA SCHONHARDT, CHELSEA HARVEY | 10/09/2025
06:22 AM EDT Roger Pielke Jr. and oil industry supporters are attacking climate scientist Friederike Otto, whose
work has been used in lawsuits against polluters. Table 12.12 | Emergence of CIDs in different time periods, as assessed in this section. The colour contesponds to the confidence of the region with the highest confidence: white cells indicate where evidence is lacking or the signal is not present, leading to overal bu confidence of an emerging signal.