Transformative change for a just and sustainable world often appears overwhelming. This Perspective highlights the key messages from the IPBES Transformative Change Assessment and how everyone can be ...

Even as scientists overwhelmingly agree on the existence and human origins of climate change, public endorsement of misinformation about global warming remains stubbornly persistent. Recent research points to system justifying beliefs as a core obstacle to correcting misinformation, particularly sexism and racism. In this article, we examine the relationship between hostile sexism and climate meta-ignorance, or the endorsement of climate misinformation while believing one knows more than experts. We use data from the American National Election Study and an original survey to show hostile sexism is associated with a combination of misinformation and overconfidence. In turn, sexism and this meta-ignorance are correlated with opposition to climate policy action. We discuss the implications for support for decarbonization policies and demand-side mitigative actions.

One hundred and seventeen days into Israel's war on Gaza, the country's minister of interior, rightwing settler Itamar Ben Gvir, delivered a speech ov...

Patients regained movement in the experimental phase of polylaminin, capable of regenerating the spinal cord in people who suffered organ rupture

A virtual, seven week beginner and intermediate course on the history of race, mass media, and the modern world order.

Some people are proposing to counteract climate change by artificially dimming the Sun. But it’s ineffective. It’s risky. And it’s…