Andy
@chiashurb.bsky.social
Gender ideology extremist. They/them.
Remember when all the immigration lawyers said this program was a filthy lie?
Presenting the full faith and credit of THIS United States government.
Presenting the full faith and credit of THIS United States government.
I’ve been worried about this. People who signed up for a US ‘self-deportation’ scheme say their payoffs were delayed, misdirected or never arrived – leaving them empty-handed in their home countries.
‘They tricked me’: Migrants were promised $1,000 to voluntarily leave the US. Some never received it
People who signed up for a US ‘self-deportation’ scheme say their payoffs were delayed, misdirected or never arrived – leaving them empty-handed in their home countries
www.theguardian.com
December 25, 2025 at 3:37 AM
Remember when all the immigration lawyers said this program was a filthy lie?
Presenting the full faith and credit of THIS United States government.
Presenting the full faith and credit of THIS United States government.
Reposted by Andy
Canadian TV network bravely airs dissidents’ report on U.S. abuses after political commissar orders its suppression
Can confirm: Pulled 60 Minutes “Inside CECOT” segment on the El Salvador mega prison housing hundreds of Venezuelan deportees sent by the U.S. is on Global TV’s free app
December 22, 2025 at 10:27 PM
Canadian TV network bravely airs dissidents’ report on U.S. abuses after political commissar orders its suppression
Reposted by Andy
BREAKING: WATCH the full 60 Minutes CECOT segment here. This was sent to me anonymously. It appears to be the segment CBS' Bari Weiss killed. www.muellershewrote.com/p/watch-the-...
WATCH: The 60 Minutes CECOT Segment
I was sent the CECOT segment anonymously in a group chat.
www.muellershewrote.com
December 22, 2025 at 10:46 PM
BREAKING: WATCH the full 60 Minutes CECOT segment here. This was sent to me anonymously. It appears to be the segment CBS' Bari Weiss killed. www.muellershewrote.com/p/watch-the-...
Reposted by Andy
"It's going to have all the guns. So many guns. Like you wouldn't believe so many guns. Beautiful guns..."
December 22, 2025 at 11:20 PM
"It's going to have all the guns. So many guns. Like you wouldn't believe so many guns. Beautiful guns..."
Reposted by Andy
started / going
December 18, 2025 at 12:13 AM
started / going
This is AMAZING
One of the biggest moments of my career:
USCIS canceled my client’s naturalization oath ceremony. We filed a lawsuit, went to trial, and the judge swore him in right there in the courtroom!
USCIS canceled my client’s naturalization oath ceremony. We filed a lawsuit, went to trial, and the judge swore him in right there in the courtroom!
December 21, 2025 at 12:15 AM
This is AMAZING
Reposted by Andy
And may every day be another wonderful secret.
December 20, 2025 at 7:14 PM
And may every day be another wonderful secret.
Reposted by Andy
Reposted by Andy
Stunning new revelation: Epstein hung out almost exclusively with guys who had black boxes where their heads should be.
December 19, 2025 at 9:17 PM
Stunning new revelation: Epstein hung out almost exclusively with guys who had black boxes where their heads should be.
Reposted by Andy
I'm gonna die on this hill. (you know who you are)
A Notice of Appeal *is* an appeal.
it is not like "the Government has said it is going to appeal."
It "has appealed."
The fact that briefing might be days/weeks/months (or hours! who knows) is a different question.
A Notice of Appeal *is* an appeal.
it is not like "the Government has said it is going to appeal."
It "has appealed."
The fact that briefing might be days/weeks/months (or hours! who knows) is a different question.
April 16, 2025 at 9:13 PM
I'm gonna die on this hill. (you know who you are)
A Notice of Appeal *is* an appeal.
it is not like "the Government has said it is going to appeal."
It "has appealed."
The fact that briefing might be days/weeks/months (or hours! who knows) is a different question.
A Notice of Appeal *is* an appeal.
it is not like "the Government has said it is going to appeal."
It "has appealed."
The fact that briefing might be days/weeks/months (or hours! who knows) is a different question.
Split verdict. Interesting. Motion for judgment of acquittal is still under advisement?
Breaking:
Judge Dugan ACQUITTED on Count One, convicted on Count 2.
Judge Dugan ACQUITTED on Count One, convicted on Count 2.
December 19, 2025 at 2:40 AM
Split verdict. Interesting. Motion for judgment of acquittal is still under advisement?
Reposted by Andy
Not for the first time, the signature block for Self-Proclaimed U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia Lindsey Halligan spelled it “Virgina.”
December 19, 2025 at 2:31 AM
Not for the first time, the signature block for Self-Proclaimed U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia Lindsey Halligan spelled it “Virgina.”
We may now get to wait an annoyingly long time as every participant in the trial makes their way back to the courtroom. People probably stayed pretty close, but the verdict always seems to come when somebody has just sat down for an embarrassingly prolonged bowel movement.
U.S. v. Dugan: We have a VERDICT.
December 19, 2025 at 2:35 AM
We may now get to wait an annoyingly long time as every participant in the trial makes their way back to the courtroom. People probably stayed pretty close, but the verdict always seems to come when somebody has just sat down for an embarrassingly prolonged bowel movement.
Reposted by Andy
U.S. v. Dugan: We have a VERDICT.
December 19, 2025 at 2:32 AM
U.S. v. Dugan: We have a VERDICT.
Veritas dictum?
8:26 p.m. CT:
There's a knock on the jury door in U.S. v. Dugan.
We wait to see why?
There's a knock on the jury door in U.S. v. Dugan.
We wait to see why?
December 19, 2025 at 2:32 AM
Veritas dictum?
Reposted by Andy
8:26 p.m. CT:
There's a knock on the jury door in U.S. v. Dugan.
We wait to see why?
There's a knock on the jury door in U.S. v. Dugan.
We wait to see why?
December 19, 2025 at 2:29 AM
8:26 p.m. CT:
There's a knock on the jury door in U.S. v. Dugan.
We wait to see why?
There's a knock on the jury door in U.S. v. Dugan.
We wait to see why?
Reposted by Andy
Looks like it is time to whip out Dr. Naomi Worf again.
December 19, 2025 at 2:18 AM
Looks like it is time to whip out Dr. Naomi Worf again.
Reposted by Andy
December 18, 2025 at 10:43 PM
Reposted by Andy
The US Administration has banned Americans from *adopting babies* from much of the African continent.
Adopting.
Babies.
What trait do those babies have that, when they grow up as fully American adults, would make them a threat to our country in any form?
Adopting.
Babies.
What trait do those babies have that, when they grow up as fully American adults, would make them a threat to our country in any form?
On that last post: I genuinely cannot think of any good-faith reason to bar international adoptions from those 39 countries. Under this new ban, consulates will refuse adoption visas for any baby from Cuba, Haiti, Venezuela, Nigeria, or any of the 39 other countries.
December 17, 2025 at 3:04 AM
The US Administration has banned Americans from *adopting babies* from much of the African continent.
Adopting.
Babies.
What trait do those babies have that, when they grow up as fully American adults, would make them a threat to our country in any form?
Adopting.
Babies.
What trait do those babies have that, when they grow up as fully American adults, would make them a threat to our country in any form?
Reposted by Andy
NB: When I, a professor of law, profess that an act is unlawful, I am not doing it to inform the lawbreaker, but rather to inform you, the reader.
So the question “what, like you think he cares?” is inapposite. The question is whether *you* care. I think you should, which is why I bother.
So the question “what, like you think he cares?” is inapposite. The question is whether *you* care. I think you should, which is why I bother.
December 18, 2025 at 9:01 PM
NB: When I, a professor of law, profess that an act is unlawful, I am not doing it to inform the lawbreaker, but rather to inform you, the reader.
So the question “what, like you think he cares?” is inapposite. The question is whether *you* care. I think you should, which is why I bother.
So the question “what, like you think he cares?” is inapposite. The question is whether *you* care. I think you should, which is why I bother.
Reposted by Andy
How does one use an "armada" to "completely surround[]" a country that is not an island?
Trump: "Venezuela is completely surrounded by the largest Armada ever assembled ... It will only get bigger, and the shock to them will be like nothing they have ever seen before — Until such time as they return to the USA all of the Oil, Land, and other Assets that they previously stole from us."
December 17, 2025 at 12:50 AM
How does one use an "armada" to "completely surround[]" a country that is not an island?
Reposted by Andy
"put a pebble in your shoe to fool gait analysis" is the Free Space of 'Got Coaxed By The FBI Into Incompetently Planning Terrorism Bingo'
December 16, 2025 at 12:36 AM
"put a pebble in your shoe to fool gait analysis" is the Free Space of 'Got Coaxed By The FBI Into Incompetently Planning Terrorism Bingo'
Reposted by Andy
Dear Bluesky hammer&sickle crowd:
That new dude in your group? He’s an FBI agent.
That new dude in your group? He’s an FBI agent.
December 16, 2025 at 12:16 AM
Dear Bluesky hammer&sickle crowd:
That new dude in your group? He’s an FBI agent.
That new dude in your group? He’s an FBI agent.
Reposted by Andy
"The jury verdict from 10 years ago contains a scrivener's error insofar as it states that the defendant was not guilty. We are changing that, nunc pro tunc, to guilty."
Yeah, no.
Yeah, no.
It is not! A “scrivener’s error” is for things like fixing typos or very minor non-material errors, not retroactively adding a deportation order that doesn’t current exist!
Is "correcting" a previous order like this a real thing?
December 12, 2025 at 4:26 PM
"The jury verdict from 10 years ago contains a scrivener's error insofar as it states that the defendant was not guilty. We are changing that, nunc pro tunc, to guilty."
Yeah, no.
Yeah, no.
This is such a transparently illegal abuse of process. Anybody who has attended a single semester of law school can issue-spot this as a basic due process violation.
A federal judge ruled Thu morning that no order of removal for Abrego Garcia had ever existed. By Thu evening, an immigration judge had conjured a “Immigration Court’s Sua Sponte Order Correcting Scrivener’s Error," Abrego Garcia's lawyers tell the judge in the emergency overnight filing:
December 12, 2025 at 1:37 PM
This is such a transparently illegal abuse of process. Anybody who has attended a single semester of law school can issue-spot this as a basic due process violation.