Reposted by DoropFan
There was only one respiratory virus that was present year-round. You guessed it, SARS-CoV-2.
It’s still here.
9/
It’s still here.
9/
October 31, 2025 at 12:19 PM
There was only one respiratory virus that was present year-round. You guessed it, SARS-CoV-2.
It’s still here.
9/
It’s still here.
9/
Reposted by DoropFan
The final published version of this study is now available in Journal of Virology at journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/...
Spike mutations that affect the function and antigenicity of recent KP.3.1.1-like SARS-CoV-2 variants | Journal of Virology
This study measures how mutations to the spike of a SARS-CoV-2 variant that circulated
in early 2025 affect its function and recognition by both the polyclonal antibodies
produced by the human immune ...
journals.asm.org
October 14, 2025 at 4:22 PM
The final published version of this study is now available in Journal of Virology at journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/...
Reposted by DoropFan
In Western Australia BA.3.2 has been around longer, but maybe we will see PE.1.4 and BA.3.2 competing against each other there soon.
September 25, 2025 at 1:01 PM
In Western Australia BA.3.2 has been around longer, but maybe we will see PE.1.4 and BA.3.2 competing against each other there soon.
Reposted by DoropFan
BA.3.2.* rebounded to 10% in the wastewater, so a further +440 to my estimated BA.3.2.* infections in Perth. That takes my estimated total past 2,100.
Meanwhile, a possible BA.3.2 / NB.1.8.1 recombinant was shared in the clinical sample data from WA ... very worrying if true ...
Meanwhile, a possible BA.3.2 / NB.1.8.1 recombinant was shared in the clinical sample data from WA ... very worrying if true ...
September 19, 2025 at 8:06 AM
BA.3.2.* rebounded to 10% in the wastewater, so a further +440 to my estimated BA.3.2.* infections in Perth. That takes my estimated total past 2,100.
Meanwhile, a possible BA.3.2 / NB.1.8.1 recombinant was shared in the clinical sample data from WA ... very worrying if true ...
Meanwhile, a possible BA.3.2 / NB.1.8.1 recombinant was shared in the clinical sample data from WA ... very worrying if true ...
Reposted by DoropFan
EPI_ISL_20175638 is the first possible recombinant with Jn.1 if real and not artifact or contamination or coinfection it would be BA.3.2.2/NB.1.8.1/BA.3.2.2/NB.1.8.1 getting from 245 to 439 in the spike from NB.1.8.1 and getting back orf7ab/Orf8 and acquiring Orf9b:I5T all from NB.1.8.1
September 17, 2025 at 11:31 AM
EPI_ISL_20175638 is the first possible recombinant with Jn.1 if real and not artifact or contamination or coinfection it would be BA.3.2.2/NB.1.8.1/BA.3.2.2/NB.1.8.1 getting from 245 to 439 in the spike from NB.1.8.1 and getting back orf7ab/Orf8 and acquiring Orf9b:I5T all from NB.1.8.1
September 15, 2025 at 12:21 AM