"No."
"No."
Letter buff.ly/xDHJIy4
Some of the Epstein docs the DOJ invited members of Congress to view are STILL redacted, despite promises otherwise.
Raskin says DOJ's reading room has just four computers. It would take seven years to get through the files in the current conditions established by the DOJ.
Some of the Epstein docs the DOJ invited members of Congress to view are STILL redacted, despite promises otherwise.
Raskin says DOJ's reading room has just four computers. It would take seven years to get through the files in the current conditions established by the DOJ.
Don’t care who.
Don’t care who.
"The Dept of Justice has been in a cover-up mode for months... trying to sweep the entire thing under the rug"
"The Dept of Justice has been in a cover-up mode for months... trying to sweep the entire thing under the rug"
whistlebloweraid.org/whistleblowe...
whistlebloweraid.org/whistleblowe...
"My advice to [DHS], if they're watching:
If you come into [our hearing] and try to justify that [Pretti] was assaulting a police officer, that cannot be acceptable."
"My advice to [DHS], if they're watching:
If you come into [our hearing] and try to justify that [Pretti] was assaulting a police officer, that cannot be acceptable."
www.youtube.com/watch?v=y-a2...
www.youtube.com/watch?v=y-a2...
-Thomas Jefferson
-Thomas Jefferson
www.theatlantic.com/magazine/202...
www.theatlantic.com/magazine/202...
www.youtube.com/watch?v=GDaP...
www.youtube.com/watch?v=GDaP...
We are clearing that up here. Our national security is at stake.
We are clearing that up here. Our national security is at stake.
In 2025, Shapiro sued Trump to get funds appropriated for PA "unfrozen." He won then, too.
I went 43-0. He went 0-43.
If he wants to run it back, we will.
In 2025, Shapiro sued Trump to get funds appropriated for PA "unfrozen." He won then, too.
Judge Kasubhai 2/5/26: "The presumption of regularity that has been previously extended to Plaintiff [U.S. government] that it could be taken at its word—with little doubt about its intentions and stated purposes—no longer holds."
Judge Kasubhai 2/5/26: "The presumption of regularity that has been previously extended to Plaintiff [U.S. government] that it could be taken at its word—with little doubt about its intentions and stated purposes—no longer holds."