banner
notoriousjcv.bsky.social
@notoriousjcv.bsky.social
Recovering judicial law clerk. Visiting Assistant Professor & Murray Fellow, Univeristy of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law

https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=3096029
Glad to see my job talk paper isn’t totally insane. Others coming around to the idea!
Spotted a Rule 11 sanctions poster in the wild today
October 9, 2025 at 1:41 AM
Semi website official, but I’m beyond thrilled to take the next step toward academia. I’ve officially started as a visiting assistant professor and Murray Fellow at the Univeristy of Maryland School of Law. I’ll hit the official “meat market” in August 2026.

www.law.umaryland.edu/faculty--res...
Profile
www.law.umaryland.edu
July 1, 2025 at 10:20 PM
Been busy unpacking for a reason I’ll announce soon and haven’t had the chance to fully digest the SCOTUS decisions. But I’m now on board with @espinsegall.bsky.social in saying #notacourt
June 27, 2025 at 3:38 PM
I see we’ve reached the point in the timeline where the DOJ is suing every federal district court judge in Maryland. This is the the type of thing pro se plaintiffs would do when I was clerking.

storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
storage.courtlistener.com
June 25, 2025 at 1:00 PM
Excellent essay by Quinn here. Well worth a few minutes of your time if you’re curious about the 22nd Amendment.
Now available on SSRN: "State Enforcement of the Twenty-Second Amendment" (forthcoming in the UCLA Law Review Discourse). This brief piece argues that compliance with the Twenty-Second Amendment *DOES* present a justiciable question and that states *MUST* enforce it.
papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....
May 21, 2025 at 3:19 PM
Pleased to announce that my paper "The Protean Procurement Act" is now officially published at the
University of Pittsburgh Law Review. lawreview.law.pitt.edu/ojs/lawrevie...

Special thanks to @beaubaumann.bsky.social for his comments on an earlier draft.
May 16, 2025 at 6:33 PM
Same. The hypocrisy of this OPM statement is maddening. But makes perfect sense for this administration.
May 6, 2025 at 7:04 PM
So it looks like all the law firms who capitulated will now be defending ICE? (1) I’m not sure how that qualifies as pro bono work and (2) that’s what government attorneys are for. It’s not too late to grow a spine.

www.whitehouse.gov/presidential...
Strengthening and Unleashing America's Law Enforcement to Pursue Criminals and Protect Innocent Citizens
By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered:Section 1.  Purpose and
www.whitehouse.gov
April 29, 2025 at 12:33 AM
This is very sketchy. The amount and time of review needed to terminate a contract (for convenience or otherwise) is long. Multiple layers of review. If not followed this contracting officers warrant needs to be pulled. They should’ve pushed back anyway.
“Please disregard that communication in its entirety, which has no legal effect,” a DOJ official wrote in a letter sent on Friday, April 4.

In a recent court filing, lawyers for the government claimed that the April 3 termination letter “was sent in error.”
April 27, 2025 at 11:47 PM
@evanbernick.bsky.social work here
is well worth a read (as is his and @anthonymkreis.bsky.social and @paulgowder.bsky.social article on birthright citizenship).
Alright, I'm putting all the critiques of Wurman in one big thread.

In short, I don't think the draft changes anything. In fact, it seems obvious to me that under his own framework, the anti-birthright EO is unconstitutional.

Here's the thread: 🧵
April 19, 2025 at 2:01 PM
Against my better judgment opened the other site for a second. Only to see an unserious person masquerading as a legal scholar. Wurman cannot take the L and move on.
April 15, 2025 at 2:36 AM
Reposted
Attn #adlaw nerds: Join Us on May 8, 2025, for the ABA Administrative Law Scholarship Conference -- 30 papers to be workshopped, ~50 scholars presenting and commenting, and plenty of time to socialize. Complimentary registration details here: www.yalejreg.com/nc/join-us-o...
Join Us on May 8, 2025, for the ABA Administrative Law Scholarship Conference - Yale Journal on Regulation
On Thursday May 8, 2025, in Washington, DC, the ABA Section of Administrative Law and Regulatory Practice is hosting a terrific scholarship conference that will feature paper presentations and comment...
www.yalejreg.com
April 13, 2025 at 7:18 PM
Reposted
Even if the worst criminal in El Salvador fled to the US, they would be entitled to an extradition hearing before being sent back and the US would not send them directly to the gulag. What Trump has done is a heinous, unprecedented abuse of power.
April 8, 2025 at 12:40 AM
Well said!
The fact that *more* law professors aren’t calling this garbage out in the way I see folks like @evanbernick.bsky.social, @anthonymkreis.bsky.social, @paulgowder.bsky.social do, or even in a more flip way, like I do, is incredibly disappointing but not surprising.
March 28, 2025 at 3:41 PM
More of this please. Call out the hypocrisy when you see it.
An extremely arch concurrence by Judge Wilson calling out the conservative 11th Circuit judges who care more about "protecting" schoolchildren from their transgender peers than actually protecting them from being gunned down in a classroom. media.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub...
March 14, 2025 at 8:50 PM
This shade at Bill Pryor, yea the one that hired that racist law clerk, makes me like Judge Rosenbaum even more.

Full opinion here: media.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub...
March 13, 2025 at 12:52 AM
This is spot on. My scholarship focuses on the games judges (mostly far-right judges) play to arrive at conclusions that fit their ideology. There’s a difference between that and a judges who lie at confirmation hearings or always fail to report gifts/bribes.
February 26, 2025 at 3:17 AM
This feels like a trap…
February 22, 2025 at 3:36 AM
Wonder if someone could make similar arguments against his wife who is also a judge (and was wildly unqualified when she was selected based on any “merit-based” standard).
Sounds like Trump’s DOJ wants some minimum standards for judicial conduct … basic requirements for how judges comport themselves to preserve the integrity of their office … enforceable rules against displays of bias and partisanship … you might even call it an ethics code. Quite a novel concept.
The Trump DOJ is big mad about their finest legal minds being humiliated in court
February 21, 2025 at 10:26 PM
Let’s just call this what it is, racism clothed in a lawsuit. Given that Target quickly bent the knee and caved to MAGA by abandoning DEI I won’t be shocked if it “contributes” to certain people and the case magically disappears.

www.tallahassee.com/story/news/l...
Florida sues Target over LGBTQ Pride campaign that sparked consumer backlash, stock drop
Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier announced a class-action lawsuit against Target Corp. over a 2023 LGBTQ Pride campaign.
www.tallahassee.com
February 21, 2025 at 5:19 PM
Reposted
Like why is the Trump-led agency’s reading of the statute more authoritative than the Biden or Obama-led agency’s reading. Under LB only courts can make that determination.
February 20, 2025 at 3:47 PM
Reposted
The DOGE firings have nothing to do with “efficiency” or “cutting waste.” They’re a direct push to weaken federal agencies perceived as liberal. This was evident from the start, and now the data confirms it: targeted agencies overwhelmingly those seen as more left-leaning. 🧵⬇️
February 20, 2025 at 2:18 AM
So many things wrong with this (i.e., the racist reasons Musk and the GOP are targeting anything DEIA), but it generally takes a contracting officer to terminate a contract and doing so is unlikely to save much money due to settlement clauses in the FAR.
Elon Musk’s Team Decimates Education Department Arm That Tracks National School Performance
The Trump administration canceled $900 million in contracts overseen by the Institute of Education Sciences, which partners with scientists and education companies to compile and make public data abou...
www.propublica.org
February 11, 2025 at 2:07 PM
“Elite” is doing a lot of work here especially considering the clerks the far right “justices” hire.
February 8, 2025 at 5:26 AM
Reposted
Affirmatively stating that you are a racist is no longer a fireable offense. But supporting workplace diversity is.
February 7, 2025 at 8:34 PM