https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=3096029
www.law.umaryland.edu/faculty--res...
www.law.umaryland.edu/faculty--res...
storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....
University of Pittsburgh Law Review. lawreview.law.pitt.edu/ojs/lawrevie...
Special thanks to @beaubaumann.bsky.social for his comments on an earlier draft.
University of Pittsburgh Law Review. lawreview.law.pitt.edu/ojs/lawrevie...
Special thanks to @beaubaumann.bsky.social for his comments on an earlier draft.
www.whitehouse.gov/presidential...
www.whitehouse.gov/presidential...
In a recent court filing, lawyers for the government claimed that the April 3 termination letter “was sent in error.”
is well worth a read (as is his and @anthonymkreis.bsky.social and @paulgowder.bsky.social article on birthright citizenship).
In short, I don't think the draft changes anything. In fact, it seems obvious to me that under his own framework, the anti-birthright EO is unconstitutional.
Here's the thread: 🧵
is well worth a read (as is his and @anthonymkreis.bsky.social and @paulgowder.bsky.social article on birthright citizenship).
Full opinion here: media.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub...
Full opinion here: media.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub...
www.tallahassee.com/story/news/l...
www.tallahassee.com/story/news/l...
DOGE is filled with lawyers, elite attorneys with conservative credentials.
We have new names:
www.propublica.org/article/elon...