Alex Patzina
@patzinaalex.bsky.social
1.3K followers 840 following 58 posts
social scientist @university of bamberg & IAB | research interests: social stratification, life course, health, wellbeing, trust. https://sites.google.com/view/alexanderpatzina/home https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5039-7
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by Alex Patzina
sewenz.bsky.social
One of many super interesting posters at #AkadSoz25, pitched by one of the authors, @isabelmhabicht.bsky.social.

Cc: @gesis.org @evazschirnt.bsky.social
patzinaalex.bsky.social
#AkadSoz25
sewenz.bsky.social
Welcher Hashtag für die morgen startende Konferenz der Akademie für Soziologie in Mainz?

#AkadSoz25 ? ( #AS2025 und #AS25 führen natürlich auch anderswo hin.)

#Soziologie
Reposted by Alex Patzina
Reposted by Alex Patzina
woessmann.bsky.social
In Zeiten von ständigen Transformationen sollten wir Bildung als Befähigung zu stetigem Wandel verstehen.

Mein Einleitungsvortrag in das Bildungspolitische Forum 2025 des @leibnizbildung.bsky.social

Livestream: www.youtube.com/@Leibniz_bil...

www.leibniz-bildung.de/veranstaltun...
Reposted by Alex Patzina
uni-bamberg.de
Die Universität Tallinn hat dem Bamberger Soziologen Michael Gebel den Titel einer Ehrenprofessur verliehen. Damit ehrt sie seine langjährige und enge wissenschaftliche Zusammenarbeit. Herzlichen Glückwunsch! 🤩 Mehr: blog.uni-bamberg.de/menschen/202...

📷 Piret Räni/ Tallinn University
Reposted by Alex Patzina
pengzell.bsky.social
Every time economists discover occupations exist, a sociologist dies
Reposted by Alex Patzina
pengzell.bsky.social
When (if ever) is it right to appeal a rejection? This advice offered by AJS seems good more generally
Under what circumstances does it make sense for me to appeal a decision? The answer is that you should appeal only if the following two things are true 

a) A reviewer made a flagrant error of interpretation as to what you had done, and 

b) The editors' letter indicates that this error was consequential for the decision. 

Note that (a) excludes differences of judgment of quality ("Reviewer A says it wasn't good enough, but it was!") and differences of interpretations of the data ("Reviewer A says my finding is due to selection, and I say it isn't!"). Note that (b) excludes times when the editorial letter passes over an error made by a reviewer in silence. 

The following are not justifications for making an appeal: 

c) You think a reviewer was biased or unfair. The editorial board understands that they have to contextualize different reviewers' positions to assemble a coherent expert judgment of a manuscript. 

d) You think that the reviewers in general are supportive. Because we can only publish a fraction of the papers that are submitted, we must reject some papers that are good, and that reviewers think are good, to make space for those that reviewers, and we, think are of outstanding importance. Further, reviewers sometimes use gentler and more supportive language in their comments to the author than they do in their comments to the editor. 

e) A reviewer found a problem in a revised manuscript that is inherent in the design seemingly acceptable in the first round of review. We do our best never to reject manuscripts upon review for reasons that should have been raised when the manuscript was first submitted. However, one reason we do add new reviewers in the R&R stage is to catch weaknesses that may have been previously missed, and if these are believed to be uncorrectable, a rejection is the only proper decision.
Reposted by Alex Patzina
hankgreen.bsky.social
It sucks that guys get so caught up in fighting for status among men that they can’t even admit a woman is hot because she isn’t the “male-culture approved” kind of hot.

Letting other men decide for you which women you think are hot might sound kinda gay, but it’s actually extremely straight.
Reposted by Alex Patzina
kostermann.bsky.social
#VET students drop out more often when the local economy is good, but what happens with dropouts' wages if such a good local economy turns bad in the following years?
If you want to know more, come to my talk in the "Returns to education" session (today 3:30pm, S12) at #ECSR2025!
Reposted by Alex Patzina
maltesandner.bsky.social
New article out!

With Laurenz Bärtsch, I examine the effects of a German parental leave reform.

The reform increased maternal part-time work during the first 12 months after birth — but interestingly, we find no long-term impact on employment or wages.👇

www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...
Reducing the child penalty by incentivizing maternal part-time work?
Governments worldwide are discussing ways to increase maternal labor market participation and to reduce the child penalty. This study analyzes the lon…
www.sciencedirect.com
Reposted by Alex Patzina
pengzell.bsky.social
All projects go through three stages: enthusiasm, despair, and strategic reframing.
Reposted by Alex Patzina
iabnews.bsky.social
Die Berufs- und Studienwahl gehört zu den wichtigsten Entscheidungen junger Menschen, denn sie stellt langfristig die Weichen für ihr künftiges Erwerbsleben. Auf einer Sonderseite hat das IAB Publikationen zum Thema „Jugendliche auf dem Weg ins Berufsleben“ zusammengestellt 👉 iab.de/themen/sonde...
Das Bild zeigt junge Menschen vor einem Gebäude.
Reposted by Alex Patzina
cyganrehm.bsky.social
One-year visiting position for advanced female postdocs in Dresden. I am happy to host anyone broadly interested in applied micro. Salary within the German public sector's pay scale (TV-L, E13-E15). Deadline: Sept 15, 2025. Please share widely! 👇
Reposted by Alex Patzina
hermwerf.bsky.social
This is a great paper on causality in the social sciences. While much of the conditionality of causal claims are known and usually well-taken, their weakest link argument goes further than that.
Reposted by Alex Patzina
soceducation.bsky.social
New work Wednesday!
A factorial survey experiment finds: study program features like content, a flexible curriculum, and institutionalized support affect enrollment intentions—but don’t reduce social inequalities in these intentions.
#CollegeEnrollment

journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10....
Sage Journals: Discover world-class research
Subscription and open access journals from Sage, the world's leading independent academic publisher.
journals.sagepub.com
patzinaalex.bsky.social
Thank you to our colleagues at @iabnews.bsky.social: Silke Anger, Sarah Bernhard, Adrian Lerche & @maltesandner.bsky.social! Without their support this study would not have been possible! 5/6
patzinaalex.bsky.social
Our results reveal significant effects of the investigated dimensions on enrollment intentions, suggesting that adjusting program content, flexibility, and support services enhances those intentions. However, we find limited effect variation across social background. 4/6
patzinaalex.bsky.social
We use data from a factorial survey experiment conducted with German high school students in their final year of school and apply random-intercept regression models to investigate the causal (socially stratified) effect of study program features on enrollment intentions. 3/6
patzinaalex.bsky.social
We examine three key elements in a study program: content, flexibility, and support. We argue that these elements shape individuals’ beliefs about costs, benefits, and their success probability, thus affecting enrollment intentions. 2/6
patzinaalex.bsky.social
Happy to see our paper out that examines the role of study program characteristics for college enrollment intentions!
This ist joint work with Carina Toussaint (lead author), Hans Dietrich and @tobiaswolbring.bsky.social

@uni-bamberg.de @fauwiso.bsky.social
@iabnews.bsky.social

1/6