Rachael Padman (she/her) 🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈 🇬🇧 🇦🇺
banner
rachael-p.bsky.social
Rachael Padman (she/her) 🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈 🇬🇧 🇦🇺
@rachael-p.bsky.social
Suffolk-based retired Cambridge physicist. Trans woman.
Catless mad catlady

I look forward to reasoned discussion, but will block people who insist there is only one way to be trans, or that my way is transphobic.

https://www.flickr.com/photos/rachael_p
Pinned
I had an epiphany this morning (yes, I am late to the party, I know).

Those 'sex-based rights' we hear about? They are the supposed right of cis females to know what genitalia everyone else when they were born. 1/3
Took me a moment.
I do appreciate humour amongst all the depression here.
December 5, 2025 at 9:35 PM
Inclusive of genocidaires, exclusive of trans folk....

"The national broadcaster for the UK, the BBC, said: “We support the collective decision made by members of the EBU. This is about enforcing the rules of the EBU and being inclusive.”"
Why Spain, Ireland, Slovenia and the Netherlands are boycotting next year's Eurovision
A number of countries had called for Israel to be excluded from the song contest over the war in Gaza
inews.co.uk
December 5, 2025 at 10:05 AM
In the darkness, some light...
Nice to see this support from the mother of a cis Brownie in today's Independent.
Those backing trans girls ban should read Brownie Law
edition.independent.co.uk
December 4, 2025 at 8:46 AM
Reposted by Rachael Padman (she/her) 🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈 🇬🇧 🇦🇺
We're watching the wholesale burning of every scrap of dignity afforded to trans people in the UK, their rights, their medical services, their employment, their place within society, their bodily functions.

It is a disgrace, and a disgusting stain on the government and media of this country.
December 3, 2025 at 11:54 AM
"She might very well pass for 45 in the dark with the light behind her".

OK, I quite liked this one.
November 30, 2025 at 10:16 PM
Seems to me there are clear grounds for complaint if the editors are *not* following a respectful style guide.

There are grounds anyway, but to respond to such a complaint, they have to either deny the style guide OR agree that the editing is out of line.

But needs a campaign. Thoughts, anyone?
November 28, 2025 at 10:02 PM
So, are the BBC lying, or is there agreement between editors and journalists to ignore their style guide?
BBC denies telling staff to describe trans women as 'biological males'
The BBC has denied giving any specific instruction or directive to editorial staff on using the phrase "biological males" to discuss trans women in their stories.
www.thepinknews.com
November 28, 2025 at 8:25 PM
Reposted by Rachael Padman (she/her) 🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈 🇬🇧 🇦🇺
An extraordinary thing, this.

A line up of stars performing at Wembley Arena to show their love and solidarity with the trans community and in aid of Good Law Project and Not A Phase.

Register now for tickets.
www.transmissionlive.uk
Trans Mission - Wednesday 11th March
Mighty Hoopla and Olly Alexander team up for a Trans Mission: an all-star solidarity concert for the trans community at OVO Arena Wembley
www.transmissionlive.uk
November 28, 2025 at 12:10 PM
16 June 2016

I'm not sure I agree exactly, or at least in those terms. I want to try out an argument I made in a letter to the @lrb.co.uk (16 June 2016). Discussion welcome -- that was already some time ago.

Short thread...
November 25, 2025 at 7:06 PM
Reposted by Rachael Padman (she/her) 🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈 🇬🇧 🇦🇺
This petition calling for a public inquiry into Russian influence on UK politics & democracy already has over 30,000 signatures. Let’s get it to 100,000 this week.

Please sign and share 🙏

petition.parliament.uk/petitions/74...
Petition: Call a public inquiry into Russian influence on UK politics & democracy
We are concerned about reported efforts from Russia to influence democracy in the US, UK, Europe and elsewhere. We believe we must establish the depth and breadth of possible Russian influence campaig...
petition.parliament.uk
November 25, 2025 at 7:32 AM
Reposted by Rachael Padman (she/her) 🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈 🇬🇧 🇦🇺
November 24, 2025 at 12:56 PM
Reposted by Rachael Padman (she/her) 🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈 🇬🇧 🇦🇺
I do think it's worth addressing that the intellectual lodestar of this government is a gibbering idiot.
There are some truly unhinged bits in the piece about Glasman, as to be expected when dealing with Glasman, but seriously what the actual? That's...one hell of a conflation of terminology.
November 23, 2025 at 4:30 PM
Since both the Times and the BBC claim to have seen the full document, could we now win an FoI for it?

The EHRC clearly can't now claim publication would be damaging.

@goodlawproject.bsky.social , @reactiveashley.bsky.social , @ameresolicitor.bsky.social , @seenpoliceuk.bsky.social
"Misogynistic" leaked guidance would ban people from toilets based on appearance
Leaked EHRC code of practice is "misogynist’s charter" that will enforce gender stereotypes in public life with "a license to discriminate"
www.wearequeeraf.com
November 23, 2025 at 2:29 PM
But it's designed to hurt us, so complaining about *that* only tells the people pushing these policies that they are succeeding.

I see where you are coming from, but (IMO) we've tried looking for sympathy, and there isn't enough of it.
Ngl, it doesn't feel awesome that so much discourse about policies designed specifically to hurt trans people is about the negative effects it might have on some cis people.

Not cos it's not bad that it will have broader incidental effects but because it should be enough that it will hurt us.
November 21, 2025 at 4:23 PM
Reposted by Rachael Padman (she/her) 🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈 🇬🇧 🇦🇺
In response to the laughable fiction presented in the letter sent by Sex Matters to BBC Board members, we have sent a rebuttal letter to clarify the real facts, rather than their Orwellian tale.
November 20, 2025 at 9:43 PM
The Indy today. As at 16:30, no responses from SM or any of the usual suspects.

The Govt put up the Childrens' Minister Josh McAlister. At first sight, the govt is preparing the ground for at least a partial retreat.

www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/poli...
November 20, 2025 at 4:36 PM
It seems to me that the media reporting this story are desperate to give the impression that this will *not* affect cis people. So they write these absurdities, in the hope the average reader won't bother to unpack them.

It will all go belly-up soon, IMHO.
Note bene: it is *only* transgender women they will be able to question to find out if they are trans. So if they know we are trans they can question us, and if not, not.

Does anyone else see a problem here?
November 20, 2025 at 3:07 PM
Sometimes you can't help thinking a post is related to the preceding one ....
November 20, 2025 at 2:43 PM
Reposted by Rachael Padman (she/her) 🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈 🇬🇧 🇦🇺
gn
November 20, 2025 at 8:43 AM
Odd that this is the most recent PM to be brave enough to say the obvious. He lost to Tony Blair 28 years ago!

I didn't dislike him, but he was a Tory and Thatcher's heir. He had to go. My infatuation with Tony Blair lasted about 2 years. I liked Brown, and pitied May. But basically downhill since
John Major, "Our links to Europe and America may be loser now than once they were and that is a loss"

"The loss of trade with Europe alone costs us £100 billion of lost trade every year"

"That's a tax yield of £40 billion"

"How useful would that have been in recent months to the Chancellor?"
November 19, 2025 at 8:30 PM
I know I'm in a minority, and that this is confirmation bias etc, but I really *hate* summer time, AND the switching, and this seems so right...
“Sleep and circadian experts generally advocate for permanent Standard Time… Change between Standard Time and DST is not simply loss/gain of sleep, but rather misalignment between circadian and social clocks…”
November 18, 2025 at 4:06 PM
Reposted by Rachael Padman (she/her) 🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈 🇬🇧 🇦🇺
Always remember that a parliamentary majority can (purport to) render a country "safe" by an Act. The Conservatives sought to do that with Rwanda, regardless of the facts.
Another chilling aspect... The Tories simply passed a law declaring Rwanda "safe".

Do we really trust that this govt or the next won't resort to similar tactics if this finds them politically convenient?

www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2025...
November 16, 2025 at 9:20 PM
Reposted by Rachael Padman (she/her) 🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈 🇬🇧 🇦🇺
The golden age of diversity and democracy in Oz.
November 16, 2025 at 7:04 AM
This is Marxism 101 as I understand it.
And is *obviously* true.
Equally, the UK is absolutely fucked because we're a small country that can no longer rely on pillaging the resources of others.

It's the most fundamental truth of our economic woes and it never, ever gets discussed.
November 15, 2025 at 5:46 PM
School is a waste of time.

90% of children find 95% of what they are taught completely irrelevant.

We put everyone through it (a) to keep them off the streets (b) to give their parents some time off and (c) in case a few find something they like.

It costs a fortune and breeds cyncism.
"my least woke opinion is---"

That's enough. We've had enough people indulging in the "thrill of a little conservatism", as a treat. Of considering reactionary thought to be a salacious and taboo in a world descending into reactionary mania.

Give me your MOST woke opinions. We're bringing it back.
November 14, 2025 at 10:44 AM